noncredibledefense

This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

vivadanang, in Montana Esequiba

lolwtf? Is there a news story behind this?

anton,

This is the Venezuela Guiana situation applied to the USS and Canada, to show how ridiculous the Venezuelan “historical claims” are.

vivadanang,

that’s pretty funky

SapphironZA, in History repeating itself once again

It’s a TV series at this point.

saltnotsugar, in Red Sea coalition members

Seychelles pulls up with 8 aircraft carriers.

eggymachus,

The Seychelles pull up their anchor and steam north

mkwt,

It’s not an aircraft carrier. It’s an aircraft carrying country.

corrupts_absolutely, in Your thoughts?

meh tanks are the prime beasts of urban combat

mnemonicmonkeys,

Isn’t urban combat the environment where tanks are the most poorly suited?

corrupts_absolutely,

pretty sure theyd be worse in space

Droechai,

I’ve heard that submarines win vs tanks in all engagements at 120 meter below sea

anton,

Submarines would also outperform tanks in space.

Randall Moore (xkcd author) wants to remind everyone turning the missiles around for maneuvering to remove the warheads. Can’t link the xkcd because it’s in a physical book.

Milk_Sheikh, in Finland is going with an M4 derivative. It's a sad time for fans of European firearms design. Oh well, at least we'll get a Sako made M4.

AR and derivatives are undeniably the best platform in almost every category. Ambi/left support is kinda a cludge, and STANAG is an okay magazine. That’s about the limits of the platform’s problems nowadays, the rest have been fixed

All the big advancements in the small arms arena are in electro-optics. Firearms have plateaued long enough that quibbling over a better gun isn’t the best place to throw R&D (or for that matter, procurement) money at. Buy all your troops RDS/LPVO for everyone, then Vis/IR laser.

OnlyTakesLs,

Well, they could try for a pistol sized cartidges firing out of pistol sized barrels with rifle sized ballistics. Super high chamber pressures though.

Milk_Sheikh,

I genuinely can’t tell if you’re having a stroke and can’t form a sentence, or are making some smartass comment about .300 BLK/9x39/etc

There’s a lot of physics that make ‘pistol bullet what goes heckin fast’ incredibly hard, if not pointless. Metallurgy, internal & external ballistics, case web separation, a valid reason why

PhlubbaDubba, in Vatnik historybuff copium (holy shit)

Nah, “if D-Day failed” implies everything up to that point being unchanged save for bad planning, in that scenario the Soviets would have had the war materials the US had been sending them and which they had turned the invasion around using by that point.

You’d need to have failed landings along the Mediterranean as well before we get to the point where the Nazi commanders who didn’t have their heads up their own asses last estimated they could turn the momentum back against the Soviets, and at that point the question isn’t if Germany could win, it’s how far Stalin would be willing to go to take the initiative back again, because the earth is a globe, and if needed, the US and Canada could have deployed their troops into the Soviet Union to mount a reinforcement operation while the UK doubled down on supplying asymmetric resistance against the Nazis, and now we’re dealing with what Japan’s role as an acting defense against such a maneuver would be or if they’d even be willing to mount a defensive operation against such a troop movement purely for Germany’s benefit.

Then again we’ve gone so far down the rabbit hole now that we’ve run into the fact that the US would probably have deployed the bomb since Germany was their intended target in the first place anyways, so does Japan just fold seeing that the US can make nukes now after Berlin becomes a glass floor?

WWII is just so all over the damn place that any point falling the other direction spirals half a million what ifs, none of which end up being answered really well in alt-hist media purely because people just have a really hard time picturing all the angles of attack in a war that truly encompasses the whole world in scope.

anton,

fact that the US would probably have deployed the bomb since Germany was their intended target in the first place anyways

While physicists originally feared the Germans developing the bomb, the intended target was always Japan because the Americans where racist.

Shauns video is long but worthwhile .

TargaryenTKE,

Not sure why you’re getting downvoted, you’re right. And that video is a banger

AlexisFR, in Vatnik historybuff copium (holy shit)
@AlexisFR@jlai.lu avatar

Well unfortunately the first part is starting to be proven right, the Ukrainians are starting to give in to the sheer pressure of the infinite manpower of the Russian army.

Draghetta,

Infinite how? Both countries have millions of military aged men, before either country actually runs out of manpower there would have to be a hundred Stalingrad battles. Clearly the population amount is not the bottleneck here. For either of them to use manpower as a “weapon” they’d have to throw naked men at machine guns hoping that bullets can’t be resupplied faster than they can draft.

Russia like any other nation has a very limited amount of manpower that they can leverage before consequences start to hit. So far they have avoided another mobilisation, but if the numbers dwindle enough they’ll have to do it and that is going to be very unpopular. They can’t afford to grind their men the way they’re doing but they’re doing it anyway, probably because they want to project the image of “endless manpower Russia” - if they can keep the farce long enough then maybe Ukraine’s allies will give up.

By believing this tankie nonsense you’re helping them. Don’t.

Mirshe,

Russia has already started to try to find new sources of conscripts - estimates peg that between 40 to as much as 75% of the originally eligible are dead or got the hell outta Dodge. This is potentially why they just criminalized homosexuality - “you’re gay, you either go to prison for life (where you will likely be killed) or you get conscripted. Your choice”. Shit, they asked North Korea of all places for soldiers.

Treczoks, in Red Sea coalition members

Theoretically, that coalition should mainly consist of countries like Malta, Panama, Liberia, Bolivia, and Mongolia. The safety of ships is duty of the country under which flag they sail. I doubt any freighter down there is registered in the US or any EU state (except Malta).

Skua,

Greece has more tonnage under its flag than three of those. It also has four of those huge Soviet armoured hovercraft. I think we now know whose job this will have to be.

Treczoks,

Good addition, I somehow forgot they had a lot of old shipping nobility there.

Bonehead, in Red Sea coalition members

Yeah, see, all you guys are fools...they're going to be looking for army guys.

CJOtheReal, in Red Sea coalition members

I mean everyone depends on that fucking trade route.

nuke,

Life pro tip: Don’t touch the boats

atocci,
@atocci@kbin.social avatar
picnic, in Finland is going with an M4 derivative. It's a sad time for fans of European firearms design. Oh well, at least we'll get a Sako made M4.

Any source for this?

setsneedtofeed,
@setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world avatar
picnic,

Okay I thought this was something recent, but apparently this was decided almost a year ago.

Thanks anyway

sbv, in Sword of Liberty

3000 himars of victory

vivadanang,

(himars + dpicm) + russian invaders = : )

saltnotsugar, in We must protect ethnic Finns in Karelia

Today on hydraulic press channel we have this Russia. It is extremely dangerous and could attack at any time. We must deal with it.

chtk,
@chtk@feddit.nl avatar

Anni: [laughs in the background]

takeda, in Vatnik historybuff copium (holy shit)

Wasn’t the majority of those Russian soldiers in WW2 made of Ukrainians?

PugJesus,
@PugJesus@kbin.social avatar

No, the makeup of the Soviet military in WW2 was pretty proportional in terms of Ukrainians (and other minorities) to Russians. However, much of Ukraine was denied to the Soviet Union as a recruiting ground due to early Nazi successes, so one could argue that Ukrainians were overrepresented in comparison to the overall manpower that the USSR had at its disposal.

Skua,

This seems unlikely given the population disparity between the Russians and Ukrainians (which was similar then as it is today) and the casualty figures. I can't find actual estimates of the ethnic breakdown of the army, but there are breakdowns of casualties by SSR. Obviously SSR is not a perfect analogue of ethnicity, but the numbers are far enough apart that I think it does the job here. Roughly 65% of military casualties were from Russia, 15% from Ukraine. Ukrainians were one of only two groups to be overrepresented as a proportion of casualty figures relative to their population though, the other being Belarusians.

maynarkh,

There actually have been recent disputes over this, as the WW2 Soviet army and the Soviet army crushing the 1956 Hungarian revolution with tanks (the origin of the word “tankie” BTW) were largely the same armies. Hungarian propaganda was blaming the Ukranians, but the army based on the deaths was proportional to the demographics of the Union, 30% UA, 60% RU, 10% mixed other IIRC.

nuke, (edited ) in What is the USMC putting in the Crayolas these days?!?!

its photoed shop theres no cuntry callt Erbia you fucking idiut

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • uselessserver093
  • Food
  • aaaaaaacccccccce
  • [email protected]
  • test
  • CafeMeta
  • testmag
  • MUD
  • RhythmGameZone
  • RSS
  • dabs
  • Socialism
  • KbinCafe
  • TheResearchGuardian
  • oklahoma
  • feritale
  • SuperSentai
  • KamenRider
  • All magazines