redballooon

@[email protected]

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

redballooon,

Mal n Film draus machen.

redballooon, (edited )

Wenn er die Aufträge an unternehmen erteilen würde um danach etwas zu haben, so wie Glasfaser Kabel oder Sozialwohnungen oder Schienen, dann wäre das ja begrüßenswert. Aber stattdessen ist das maximale woran unsere Politiker denken eine Bezuschussung für das Eigentum private Unternehmen, die dann ein klein wenig Regulierung in Kauf nehmen müssen.

Und das gilt der CDU schon als Zumutung. So wie der Linkspartei bezeichnenderweise auch.

redballooon,

Diesen Kommentar nach dem anderen zu lesen ist schon etwas skurril.

redballooon,

Angeklagter beruft sich vor Gericht darauf, dass er das Gesetz gegen das er verstößt eigentlich ändern will, nur noch nicht dazu kam.

Das hat ein bisschen was von einem Monty Python Sketch.

redballooon,

Na dann ist ja alles gut. Es gibt nichts zu sehen. Bitte weitergehen.

redballooon,

If you’re in your 20s

redballooon,

Während die AfD armen Leuten durchaus zugesteht reinen Blutes zu sein und nur die armen Schlammblüter verderben sehen will.

Why is everything in consumer / American life so fucking shitty now - and companies literally just say 'oh bc profit margins' and we're now expected to swallow that and sympathize?

like I went to taco bell and they didn’t even have napkins out. they had the other stuff just no napkins, I assume because some fucking ghoul noticed people liked taking them for their cars so now we just don’t get napkins! so they can save $100 per quarter rather than provide the barest minimum quality of life features.

redballooon,

According to your statement there must be someone getting fucked. An trade where all parties are satisfied does not seem possible.

redballooon,

I think that’s two different things. Billionaires can and do get continuously richer also when there are napkins in a restaurant to satisfy customers.

Actually, satisfied customers are return customers, which every businessman knows are the best customers. Amazon certainly knows that. The reason why Amazon is so succesful is because they focus intensely on customer satisfaction. They’re fucking their employers, yes, but they wouldn’t need to. They just do because the regulations allow for it.

redballooon,

Thinking itself is not easy for many, and that doesn’t even include the critical .

redballooon,

Ok?

Gibt es irgendwelche Ansprüche zu wissen ob eine KI Aussagen auswertet, die hinausgehen über die Ansprüche zu wissen, ob ein regelbasiertes System die Ansprüche auswertet?

redballooon,

Die spd Verantwortlichen machen also geltend dass die Emails nicht nur cum ex relevante Informationen enthalten, sondern auch unabhängige Partei Themen in die der politische Gegner keinen Einblick haben soll. Das ist sogar verständlich, ist aber keinesfalls eine Rechtfertigung für einen solchen Vorgang, der durch und durch nach Verschleierung und Korruption stinkt. Wenn es wirklich nur um die Art des Zugriffs durch Mitglieder des Untersuchungsausschusses ging, wäre ein völlig anderer und sauberer Umgang mit dem Problem möglich gewesen.

redballooon,

What country is that?

redballooon,

Many liberals have terrible views about gun violence in general IMO, and a serious lack of comprehension of the problem.

Could you elaborate that a bit?

redballooon,

Civilian disarmamends happened in various countries, i.e. Australia in 1996/97, UK after the Dunblane school massacre in 1996, Japan post WW2, South Africa in 2000, Colombia in 2000 and 2016, New Zealand after Christchurch.

Strategies and success vary, but it’s not unheard of.

redballooon,

“Just ban guns” is the slogan for demonstrations. Any politician who is elected for doing that will obviously need to have a better plan. Usually such plans don’t fit on a poster.

redballooon,

First of all, gun laws have been more or less the same for the past 100 years in the U.S., so how can they be the cause of the recent rise in mass shootings? Simple answer: they’re not.

So guns changed over the past 100 years, but the laws did not adjust. Sounds like a bad idea. How can a new technology a cause for a new problem? Did that ever happen???/s

Semi-automatic rifles were not overly widespread before the 1990, and when they became, in 1994 there was a time-limited ban for semi-automatic firearms, which then expired in 2004. And what are the major concerns for mass shootings in recent years? It is semi-automatic firearms.

If they were serious about curbing gun violence, their focus wouldn’t be on mass shootings so much as smaller-scale gun crime.

Why do you think they want to ban all guns? But when you’ve a gun proponents such as in the US you gotta get real about what you can achieve. So it is not hypocrisy to focus on assault weaponry.

That hobby thing can be said about many forbidden things, for example smoking cannabis.

redballooon,

Introducing regulations usually doesn’t mean complete and utter ban.

redballooon,

Ein Rätsel bei welcher Wählergruppe der so viel Zustimmung findet.

redballooon,

30€ + 7% macht 32,1€, + 19% macht 38,2€. Voila, man muss die Zahlen nur richtig jonglieren können.

Mindestens! Da kommt ja noch Inflation obendrauf!

redballooon,

And the remainder of lemmy is the capitalist establishment?

redballooon,

Nope. Comment threads don’t work like that.

redballooon,

Another repeating problem is the vast generalizations. Treating “the West” as if they’re all Bush Jr. or Reagan.

redballooon,

Given the comment you’re just responding to, that’s a level of not-self-reflection that’s usually reserved to /r/selfawarewolfs or the like.

redballooon, (edited )

Here are some properties of any conspiracy theory worth it’s name:

  • Closed Ideological Systems: They provide an all-encompassing explanation for various events or states, with everything fitting into their worldview.
  • Immunity to Facts: Any contrary evidence is dismissed as false or considered part of the conspiracy.
  • Enemy Construction: They tend to draw a clear line between “us” (those who “know the truth”) and “them” (the supposed conspirators).
  • Adaptability: Conspiracy narratives can change and incorporate new “evidence” or events to maintain their credibility.

It matches for QAnon and the MAGA crowd as well as the lemmygrad crowd.

redballooon,

Just to understand what you are saying, do you say communists apply scientific reasoning?

redballooon,

I’m not even American yet still in “the west”, and refuse to be identified by American subpar ways of determining people in power.

redballooon,

That’s very abstract and doesn’t mean much. With as many words you can say capitalism is based on scientific reasoning.

redballooon,

What’s your view on Trump?

redballooon,

Oh there certainly is. You gotta read those comment threads yourself.

It’s popped up in this one, too. It’s really curious how you can read and write enough to answer here, but not see that.

redballooon,

Ok, Stalin

redballooon,

I understand. You refuse to accept something that is fairly obvious for many Lemmy users and want to put a burden of proof on me, and because I don’t want to take on additional work for someone I neither know nor agree with, you are happy to keep your opinion, as am I to keep mine.

Lässt Lindner die Ampel-Koalition platzen? (www.n-tv.de) German

In der Bundesregierung braut sich etwas zusammen. Das Karlsruher Urteil stürzt die Koalition in eine akute Haushaltskrise. Anders als SPD und Grüne fordert FDP-Chef Lindner, nur mit dem verbliebenen Geld zu wirtschaften. Manches erinnert an Genscher 1982, der SPD-Kanzler Schmidt die Koalition aufkündigte....

redballooon,

Im letzten “Lage der Nation” Podcast haben die das alles durchdiskutiert und kamen zu dem Schluss, dass die FDP trotz aller Moserei kaum ein Interesse haben kann, die Ampel platzen zu lassen.

Es käme ja nicht zwingend zu Neuwahlen, bei denen die FDP zittern müsste. Der Kanzler wurde für die Legislaturperiode gewählt. Und der kann dann mit einer Minderheitsregierung sein Spiel versuchen. Damit kann er zwar kaum Gesetze verabschieden, aber ein grüner Verkehrsminister könnte z.B. den neuen Spielraum in der Straßenverkehrsordnung trotzdem nutzen. Andere Verordnungen kann eine Minderheitsregierung auch machen.

D.h. die FDP kann bei Verbleib in der Regierung weiterhin blockieren, und beim Ausscheiden aus der Regierung haben sie weniger Möglichkeiten, den anderen Regierungsparteien in die Suppe zu spucken.

What's the name of the belief that gods/entities are quasi-semtient memes (the linguistic term, not the cultural term) in the same manner that corporations and governments are considered people?

It’s a personal philosophy that I’ve come to use as my own form of religion, and while I’m aware other people have researched the idea, I’m having some trouble finding the name for the concept.

redballooon,

Maybe Egregore?

Is it just me, or has the BS with OpenAI shown that nobody in the AI space actually cares about "safeguarding AGI?"

Money wins, every time. They’re not concerned with accidentally destroying humanity with an out-of-control and dangerous AI who has decided “humans are the problem.” (I mean, that’s a little sci-fi anyway, an AGI couldn’t “infect” the entire internet as it currently exists.)...

redballooon,

Hey I am not an AI , I have real feelings, and you hurt them by calling me a looser ass chucklefucks!

redballooon,

Lasst uns die Klima Erwärmung mit sozialer Kälte bekämpfen — FDP

redballooon,

Na sowas. Und ich höre von meinen Russland verstehenden Freunden immer nur, dass wir Russland immerzu nie Feindschaft entgegen gebracht hätten, pausenlose Provokation. Und dass eine stärkere wirtschaftliche Verflechtung friedensstiftend gewesen wäre.

Why do most people refuse to accept that they are wrong

I have come across a lot’s of people like these. like 99% of them. Sometimes it makes me think twice if what i am saying is wrong? What’s wrong with them. Is it so hard to swallow your pride and acknowledge that the other person is speaking facts? When they come to know they are wrong they proceed to insult/make fun of...

redballooon,

I suppose the positions you are describing are not reached by reasoning, rather by being part of a group, religion or ideology. In those cases it’s quite clear that they can’t give up the position unless they weaken their ties to that group/religion/ideology, or abandon it entirely.

Some times in their life people are open to big changes, but most of the time not.

redballooon,

Does not stand to scrutiny. I counted and only 3 out of 13 are like that. And only two of those would post online.

redballooon,

And this is the normal thing how it works Just not online because what’s said there doesn’t fade away. It just keeps up standing there regardless if the author since then changed their mind.

redballooon,

Just a moment ago someone called a comment of mine sensible. 😃

redballooon,

I have my phone unlock when it sees my face.

There’s Siri.

And GPT-4 is a good way to double check some suspicions how historical events may be connected, and when I’m looking for a name. And other things too.

redballooon,

Yes, but without the funny part

redballooon,

Oh dear that comment really gets me angry. How can you be so sensible on social media!!

/s

What do you all do on your phones that isn't doom-scrolling or mindless mini games?

I find myself checking out pretty often and just making myself feel bad about the state of the world, or killing half an hour on stupid games that I could 100% live without. This is probably pretty common, and I’m wondering what other people have found as a way to do more productive things with their phones in the downtime.

redballooon,

Pull it out. Look at the time. Remember I didn’t want to doomscroll. Put it back. Repeat.

redballooon,

What happened there?

redballooon,

Klar, es gibt für jede Meinung irgendwelche Vertreter.

Aber politisch relevant sind im Kulturkampf eigentlich nur die Saftsäcke wie Jordan Peterson und. Die müssen gegen Strohmänner argumentieren, denn die Vertreter der “alle-müssen-genau-so-gendern”-Seite sind vielleicht ein paar verirrte Studenten. Aber halt nicht politisch relevant.

redballooon, (edited )

Ich denke es gibt genug Kritikfähiges auf der gender-gleichmacherei Seite.

Ich denke aber auch, dass der richtige Zeitpunkt für eine Diskussion darüber ist, wenn da konkrete Vorschläge gepusht werden, z.B. Quoten. Dann können wir über Quoten reden. Ich bin kein Fan von Quoten, und manche meiner Argumente diesbezüglich sind nicht so verschieden von Petersons Argumenten diesbezüglich.

Das was die AfD und CDU mit ihrem Kulturkampf betreibt ist aber eine einseitige Scheindebatte.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • random
  • uselessserver093
  • Food
  • aaaaaaacccccccce
  • test
  • CafeMeta
  • testmag
  • MUD
  • RhythmGameZone
  • RSS
  • dabs
  • KamenRider
  • TheResearchGuardian
  • KbinCafe
  • Socialism
  • oklahoma
  • SuperSentai
  • feritale
  • All magazines
    •