This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

Wilibus,

Some do. One of the biggest wonders of my life has been growing up and learning how many women out there are actually into being choked, tied up, degraded and all other variety of sexual kinks.

This is what Canada will look like in 20 years – are we ready for an aging population? (www.ctvnews.ca)

New data reveals Canada's senior population is expected to exceed 11 million people by 2043. This rapid rise in the number of older Canadians will have wide-reaching implications on sectors such as health care and employment, with experts sounding the alarm that Canada is not prepared to handle an aging population.

Wilibus,

I can’t wait for people who don’t have enough to fund the lavish lifestyles of people who spent their entire lives with too much because it’s not their fault we didn’t pull up our boot straps.

Wilibus,

I don’t think there is a regulatory entity policing this issue.

And every real Canadian knows the best coffee in the country comes from small town Esso’s.

It's not your imagination: Companies are more willing to raise their prices now — and it's because we let them (www.cbc.ca)

Supply chains, worker wages and the price of energy has been blamed for the current bout of high inflation. But central bankers around the world are starting to clue in to something consumers have been aware of for a while — corporations just aren't afraid to raise their prices anymore.

Wilibus,

The TL;DR historically is that rises in wages led to more spending which increased demand and caused inflation. That’s an incredible oversimplification obviously, but that’s the meat and potatoes of it. People have more money to spend, companies can charge more, your individual dollars become worth less and less over time.

Nowadays with wages stagnating (even reducing in some situations) and immigration being so prevelant we have a situation of more people having less to spend but overall more money being injected into the economy having a similar inflationary impact.

Don’t misread what I wrote and think I am blaming immigration for the current situation, it is entirely the regulatory bodies who dropped the ball by encouraging immigration with no proper economic plan to handle the consequences.

Wilibus, (edited )

$3/month really means nothing to me, considering I already $18.99/month for a YouTube music family plan.

My issue is them purposely attempting to make my experience worse and then selling what they have arbitrarily taken away back to me.

If you product is so valuable the only way a conpany can sell it is to attack your user’s experience so you pay them to stop it really starts drawing too many similarities to a mob protection racket.

EDIT: In order to be fully transparent, apparently inflation made a fool of me, the YouTube premium family plan has increased to $22.99/month so the difference would be $4 per month, not $3.

Wilibus,

I was also a GPM user though I will admit everything I used has finally made its way to YTM. So I can’t complain about this anymore and it still a superior offering to the yo-ho alternatives.

The price is not the issue. $3/month is incredibly reasonable, especially given how much I use YouTube. The issue is how they are bullying people into paying it, at that point it doesn’t matter how good the deal was.

Wilibus,

What perks? I don’t understand what benefit exists other than blocking ads they no longer allow me to block.

Wilibus,

Just double checked this. Currently I am paying for a family plan which gives me 5 users and it costs $18.99 CAD. The family plan with 5 users is $22.99

I believe this recently increased because I kinda ticked off when they launched Stadia and sent all the YT premium customers free Stadias that came with Chromecast Ultras and I recall feeling like an idiot for not having the right plan and Google not being willing to switch me over and give me the free hardware.

Wilibus,

I’ve used offline browsing before, it definitely used to be a feature they offered.

Wilibus,

Absolutely unfair, not fair like violating the charter rights of children by making it a law to purposely misgender them.

Fuck this Hank Hill look-a-like shitbag.

Wilibus,

That’s a very loose definition of the word “struggles”

Wilibus,

Careful your transphobia is showing.

Wilibus,

I had DRM on my coffee pot on my 2017 bingo card.

Wilibus,

Are they going to claim that as a $13 write off or a $1400 write off?

Wilibus,

The $15/month I pay for Wrath of Lich King Classic is starting to seem like a good deal.

That’s how awful this company has gotten.

Wilibus,

Sorry I am having fun the wrong way.

Wilibus,

Let’s be honest, they didn’t add gold buying, they added Blizzard branded gold buying.

Pretending this wasn’t an issue before the wow token is monumentally ignorant. Blizzard normalized gold buying a long time ago by prioritizing monthly sub revenue over enforcing their own terms of service.

Wilibus,

It’s amazing how well the average white supremacist can blend into society.

Please stop being so closedminded. These people want you to think since they aren’t toothless rednecks in a Maga hat that they can’t possibly be racist. This shit comes in a sizes and flavours.

Wilibus,

I mean he wore a hoodie to work. I’m surprised anyone survived to be able to report on that cataclysmic event. Going to be decades before the country can heal from the devastation that was caused.

Wilibus,

My breaking point for paying for something that I could otherwise get for free is convenience. Doesn’t even need to be a lot, I just refuse to pay for a product that artificially more of a hassle than the identical product that I can obtain for free.

It’s not so much that I want a superior product, it’s that I refuse to pay money for an inferior alternative.

Wilibus,

This is officially the second dumbest take on the value of a quarter.

I knew a person who thought quarter to six meant 5:35 because “how many cents in a quarter dumbass.”

Wilibus,

This comment deserves Lemmy Gold

Wilibus,

The article I’m assuming you didn’t read cited several similar laws being considered by other countries.

Lauren Boebert's Beetlejuice companion owns pro-LGBT bar that hosted a drag show: report (www.rawstory.com)

Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-CO) is getting some heat after video footage showed her in close contact with a male companion at a Beetlejuice musical from which she was booted after allegedly vaping in front of a pregnant woman. That companion is reportedly the owner of a pro-LGBT bar that has hosted a dra...

Wilibus,

Not to mention her previous experience as a hooker.

Wilibus,

Dead of Winter.

The first player token passes counter-clockwise, while play order proceeds clockwise.

This means the last player in order each round becomes the first player the following round. This is specifically impactful when dealing with the games hidden betrayal mechanic since it allows you to reveal yourself as the last action of a turn and then gets a second turn before any players have a chance to react.

Wilibus,

Her skills in toaster operation seem pretty important given the context.

Wilibus,

She used to be a hooker, those are generally valued hourly.

Wilibus,

I’m not going to look for it because fuck spez, but there was a Reddit post that had her entire profile from sugardaddymeet. Can’t honestly say the photos were hard on my eyes.

Alas I will grant that this only proves she made an effort to trade sex for money, not that she actually succeeded. I guess the debate now becomes are you considered a prostitute after you create an ad to sell sex or only after your first verifiable transaction.

Wilibus,

The only shrinkflation I support is a 32 hour, 4 day work week.

'Just sick of the crime': Restaurants dealing with in an increase of people dining and dashing (winnipeg.ctvnews.ca)

“I can tell you that the people that are doing it aren’t the people who are coming here because they’re looking for a sandwich because they’re hungry,” said Ravi Ramberran, “It’s the people who are not afraid of consequences period.”...

Wilibus,

This is the problem.

Framing this as the consumer doing something wrong and withholding wages from the servers is total bullshit.

The real fault is the industry underpaying their staff and leaving it up to the consumers to subsidize a significant portion of their income.

Wilibus,

I wouldn’t call it a plague of selfishness.

Society has certainly stopped looking fondly on those who go out of their way to help others though. But it goes further than that if you expend effort on something you don’t have to, you are looked at as having made a mistake.

Wilibus,

None of what you said justifies paying these employees less because consumers are expected to give them money above and beyond the products/services that were purchased.

Wilibus,

If you want to take his technology to wage foreign wars then do it.

If you’d rather just rely on a private citizens to provide vital military infrastructure to your allies then deal with the fact that private citizens are prone to such behaviors as acting in their own best interest.

Wilibus,

That’s a really awful comparison and not just because you misspelled Raytheon.

Go look up what a strawman argument is.

Wilibus,

Just think of how much money was saved by letting Musk provide vital defense infrastructure for free.

Sure, Musk is a piece of shit, but when you don’t want to pay for a babysitter and a deranged cannibal offers to watch your child for free, is it really entirely the cannibals fault when he eats your baby despite him totally promising not to.

Wilibus,

I was pretty direct to the point with my comment. Sorry you got touchy about me correcting your spelling.

It’s not he was sitting there one and his Elon senses started tingling and he suddenly disabled Starlink without warning. They made a request to broaden the usage area and he inferred what they were trying to do and denies it because of the what he felt was a risk he didn’t want to take. The whole Pearl Harbour 2.0 potentially escalating into a nuclear conflict, which is more likely than people are willing to give him credit for.

Whether you agree or disagree with his decision, the issue here isn’t which side he choose, it is the fact he was given the capability to make that choice.

Your turn to explain how this situation is similar to a US arms manufacturer choosing which child has their bombs dropped on it.

Wilibus,

The Air Force said in its contract justification document, cited in the reports, that the deal involves Starlink supporting US military bases in Europe and Africa with fixed-site and portable satellite internet services.

The contract was for US military bases, not for facilitating offensive strikes. So this was expected au gratis.

Wilibus,

Article is pretty clear about it being for US military bases, not offensive operations. Which is a very significant restriction.

Initially it was offered without cost as humanitarian aid. When they expanded on the use of it to include military operations, Elon (rightfully) attached a price tag to it. When they wanted to use outside of the scope of the services they contracted it for Elon said no. Once again another reason infrastructure shouldn’t be provided by private citizens.

Wilibus,

Won’t? Or can’t?

The fact that your post agrees with my point makes believe it is the latter and you’re just a “eLoN bAd hE b0rKeD tWitUr” moron.

Wilibus,

Next do California sliding into the Pacific. Team Blue is fucked when that happens.

Wilibus,

The proper path to that is better and more communication between the school and the parents, not authoritatively banning gender affirming care.

Wilibus,

But authoritatively banning basic gender affirming behavior doesn’t hurt the child?

Maybe the answer here is put more effort than to make a one sized fits all solution to this crisis.

Wilibus,

So is your argument that using a child’s preferred pronouns are not a forming of gender affirming care?I’m kinda confused on your position.

Wilibus,

I was under the impression you were against telling parents, which made some of your posts seem very contradictory.

Wilibus,

I think the disconnect was your first reply which made me believe you were playing devil’s advocate.

I am also not 100% on board with omitting the parents. I think if there a possibility that the children are being harmed that needs to be something our educators are trained to recognize, no different than if the children were showing up to school malnourished or with unexplained bruises.

It’s not the school divisions responsibility to determine which ideological beliefs are best for their children and what secrets should be kept from them. They are legal guardians for a reason and have every right to informed of their children’s behavior.

But I do feel the school divisions has a responsibility to let the proper authorities know if any kind of child abuse is occurring, which includes not allowing a child to express the gender identity they are comfortable with.

Wilibus,

Being an outside observer I am kind of excited for him to flee the country and attempt to run for president of the United States from somewhere like Russia or North Korea.

Best. Timeline. Ever.

Wilibus,

Which part exactly? Him being found guilty, him trying to flee the country, or him continuing to claim victory after fleeing the country?

This timeline is eerily close to a conceivable reality.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • uselessserver093
  • Food
  • aaaaaaacccccccce
  • test
  • CafeMeta
  • testmag
  • MUD
  • RhythmGameZone
  • RSS
  • dabs
  • KamenRider
  • TheResearchGuardian
  • KbinCafe
  • Socialism
  • oklahoma
  • SuperSentai
  • feritale
  • All magazines