This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

Tak,
@Tak@lemmy.ml avatar

I think decentralization mostly shines in sharing. Comunopedia would obviously do what I’m thinking but I bet there’s some who would feel scared of it.

Tak,
@Tak@lemmy.ml avatar

“word scary” is probably the most annoying crowd.

Tak,
@Tak@lemmy.ml avatar

IMO we shouldn’t use phone numbers anymore. Usernames that can request to contact are far superior. The fact that my number can be passed around and shared against my consent then called whenever they feel like it is ridiculous.

Tak,
@Tak@lemmy.ml avatar

I think there’s more anonymity away from phone numbers because the way phone numbers are plain text and sold. The only way to really keep a phone number anonymous is to constantly switch phone numbers instead of switching logins.

In today’s world I feel like it’s much easier to whitelist who you want to talk to instead of blacklist who you don’t. It’s way too easy to spin up another virtual phone number and just call again or spam texts.

Tak,
@Tak@lemmy.ml avatar

I hope you feel better soon

Tak,
@Tak@lemmy.ml avatar

This case could also be potentially leveraged in against Apple for the app store.

Tak,
@Tak@lemmy.ml avatar

Why do you say commerce is specifically ethical? I’ve always considered it more neutral and up to implementation.

Tak,
@Tak@lemmy.ml avatar

I think you’re making a discussion into a spit fight for the sake of feeling better about yourself. I ask because I want to understand and for no other reason.

Tak,
@Tak@lemmy.ml avatar

So the act of commerce is ethical but the source of the commerce might not be? I feel like I’m being really obtuse here and I apologize but goods and services could be stolen or forced and rarely is legislation enough. But I can totally see two unknowing people engaging in trade at their free will for items they don’t know are stolen.

I feel so pessimistic about the world at times that I find materialism and ethics just don’t mix.

Tak,
@Tak@lemmy.ml avatar

A lot of it is decades of misinformation and propaganda paired with limited to no education and what some journalists call “braindrain” where those who do come from these areas and do get educated end up leaving.

Tak, (edited )
@Tak@lemmy.ml avatar

It’s already been done with lighting and building. It used to be that you could only work when the seasons, weather, and sun allowed.

Tak, (edited )
@Tak@lemmy.ml avatar

Nobody does work out of that truck, it has a bed cover and the wheels don’t look like they have any mud or dirt caked in the tread/wheels. It’s a little pavement princess that probably carries one person 75% of the time.

Tak,
@Tak@lemmy.ml avatar

It’s not just big vehicles that do that. For instance I wouldn’t call a supra a big vehicle but when they wake me up at 3 AM because they have to be louder than fire sirens I feel like that is compensating as well.

Tak,
@Tak@lemmy.ml avatar

Wasn’t expecting to see Henry Kissinger in there. Rest in piss.

Divert military spending to fund climate aid, activists urge Cop28 (www.theguardian.com)

The world’s militaries produce at least 5.5% of greenhouse gas emissions – more than the total footprint of Japan – according to one 2022 estimate. But no country is required to provide data on military emissions thanks to successful lobbying by the US at the Kyoto conference in 1997. Leaders removed the exemption in 2015...

Tak,
@Tak@lemmy.ml avatar

With the dystopia we live in I have a feeling they will aim to greenwash the military instead.

Tak,
@Tak@lemmy.ml avatar

The fluctuation in Simplified Chinese use makes me pretty suspect here. It was nearly cut in half in one month and suddenly 20% of Steam’s users that used Simplified Chinese just didn’t exist.

Honestly that big of a fluctuation in regional selection tells me none of the other data means anything.

Tak,
@Tak@lemmy.ml avatar

Oh it does, just for private entities.

Tak,
@Tak@lemmy.ml avatar

The IRS can audit the ultra wealthy exclusively and it still wont really change how fucked taxes are in the US. The tax brackets are a fucking wreck, capital gains is a joke, and estate tax is basically non existent.

It’s like cheering for Biden for really sticking it to those rich folk when he’s just checking their couch for quarters.

Tak,
@Tak@lemmy.ml avatar

That’s what I am saying, this is nothing and we shouldn’t be celebrating nothing. It’s not like they fixed the Trump admin’s tax changes, it’s not like they’re taxing the wealthy more.

To do more than nothing takes an act of Congress and they’re not doing anything, they’re doing nothing. This is the legal equivalent of 4th grade graduation ceremonies.

Tak,
@Tak@lemmy.ml avatar

Why save for a retirement you might never have when you can accept death and enjoy what you can now. Yolo

Tak,
@Tak@lemmy.ml avatar

In 2021 4,752 children had gun related deaths. That’s 13 a day.

Tak,
@Tak@lemmy.ml avatar

It’s weird how frequently people disagree but talk to eachother with respect on lemmy.

Tak,
@Tak@lemmy.ml avatar

I’m sorry you’ve found it worse. Reddit was always incredibly toxic for me and even smaller communities were terrible.

Tak,
@Tak@lemmy.ml avatar

I wish being kind was easy. Sometimes I feel like kindness is one of the hardest things to do.

Tak,
@Tak@lemmy.ml avatar

When you have your English paper peer reviewed and nobody says anything bad about it to fix.

When you write a generally accepted opinion online and have to defend your position like it’s a master’s thesis.

Tak,
@Tak@lemmy.ml avatar

I just feel bad for the poor belt buckle. Look at him… trying his best.

Tak,
@Tak@lemmy.ml avatar

Excuse me but I’m entitled to a sliver of your spongy grey matter because I spent money. /s

Tak,
@Tak@lemmy.ml avatar

Honestly it’s hard when IM platforms are so fragmented to get the people around you to move over. I never had to convince friends to move to Lemmy to use it.

I think you’re kidding so don’t take this all as a criticism.

Tak,
@Tak@lemmy.ml avatar

I purchased R6S years ago and it’s gotten nothing but worse over time.

Tak,
@Tak@lemmy.ml avatar

Is a loaf of bread a bread sandwich?

Tak,
@Tak@lemmy.ml avatar

I don’t think we are the target audience because we don’t really need to be told what pinning a tab does.

Tak,
@Tak@lemmy.ml avatar

I thought IP just referred to something you can’t physically steal and instead copy.

Tak,
@Tak@lemmy.ml avatar

I always considered it like thought property, not exactly tangible and the closest you could do is copy it.

Tak,
@Tak@lemmy.ml avatar

I mean. Literally, literally means figuratively now. People look at DVDs and say they’re not a digital copy when they are written digitally. Words are fluid and contextual so to throw out half a phrase is to throw out the ability to understand it.

Property is a system of rights that gives people legal control of valuable things,[1] and also refers to the valuable things themselves. -Property Wiki

An intellectual property would then logically follow it is a valuable thing or idea that is then legally controlled.

Tak,
@Tak@lemmy.ml avatar

Meanwhile I bet a prius will carry 99% of what they put in it

Tak,
@Tak@lemmy.ml avatar

See that’s what gets me. You need a very specifically large load that is (in my experience) extremely rare. In the gas savings alone you could just rent a truck when you need to move gravel or large furniture and not scratch up your $90,000 truck.

Tak,
@Tak@lemmy.ml avatar

They do claw their way up… over the corpses (literal and figurative) of the people who work under them.

Tak,
@Tak@lemmy.ml avatar

I would if I could. Fuck cars.

Tak,
@Tak@lemmy.ml avatar

I agree with you in most cases.

There is a point though as a water cooler can cool an extremely small area better than heatpipes. Look at Zen 4 processors for instance. The CCD is so small and offset that many air coolers don’t properly line the heat pipes with part of the CPU making the most heat. Because of this Noctua even makes and sells an offset bracket to try and move the heatpipes over the CCD. Meanwhile a waterblock should cool the entire area at effectively the same rate as it doesn’t rely on vaporizing the coolant and condensing but just pushing coolant through regardless of heat saturation.

Only a fraction of people should really notice that like overclockers and generally people buy coolers they don’t need.

Tak,
@Tak@lemmy.ml avatar

Do we gatekeep Java though?

Tak,
@Tak@lemmy.ml avatar

Find a hobby or learn something. The internet has so much to give that isn’t outrage and horror.

He’s a guy I like watching now and again building a solar array by himself

Tak,
@Tak@lemmy.ml avatar

Can’t you just disable fastboot?

Control Panel>Hardware and Sound>Power Options>System Settings Uncheck “turn on fast startup”

Tak,
@Tak@lemmy.ml avatar

Gross

U.S. Pledge To Triple Global Nuclear Energy By 2050 (www.huffpost.com)

When I first read the titile, I thought that the US is going to have to build A LOT to triple global production. Then it occured to me that the author means the US is pledging to make deals and agreements which enable other countries to build their own. Sometimes I think the US thinks too much of itself and that’s also very...

Tak,
@Tak@lemmy.ml avatar

There is no upstream, you’re thinking it’s a dam but you don’t dam up a stream. You have two containers at different elevations to store potential energy.

You’re conflating a lot of things in this second paragraph. The world can generate enough solar for the entire planet off an area the size of new mexico. LA can power itself off just covering parking lots toe power itself. Then there’s nuclear, wind, tidal… All of these need a buffer because they struggle with either inconsistent production or inconsistent demand. Pumped hydro’s only purpose is to be that buffer. When you’re making lots of electricity you move mass up and when you’re needing more than you can produce you move mass down.

The US can power itself for the next 100 year off waste nuclear weapons alone… but nuclear wants to sit at a flat load. Because of this, you’d need brownouts to shed demand. Pumped hydro means you can run more nuclear and generate more electricity than the grid needs at night or whatever and pump water up a tube to another container.

Basically, the reason we use natural gas to generate power is because it is cheaper than anything and can be stopped/started with much less fuss. LNG tanks are pretty cheap, it comes from the ground at a determined rate… it’s super convenient.

But a LiFePo battery system with inverters and solar is enough to power households if done efficiently for less than $50,000. The price gets lower every year and eventually people will be able to opt out of the grid entirely.

Tak,
@Tak@lemmy.ml avatar

The amount of (potential) energy you can store is a function of the volume of the above container, isn’t it?

No. The potential energy is determined by elevation difference and mass.

Then, could you estimate the amount of water this container would need to be able to retain in a scenario where the grid relies primarily on intermittent energy sources?

That depends on each individual site of pumped hydro. Obviously a site with a 1000m drop will need less water in containment but enough to fill the pipes.

Then, could you estimate the amount of water this container would need to be able to retain in a scenario where the grid relies primarily on intermittent energy sources?

Yes

And can you propose an engineering solution to contain this much amount of water? I already did in my first comment you apparently didn’t read.

It’s not a reinvented dam because dams can only be built where there is a gorge and a drop. For instance you can’t really dam the Mississippi. You also can’t dam mostly every mountain but you can build a container on a mountain and fill it with any mass.

I don’t agree nor disagree with the rest of what you say, I just can’t get beyond the “energy storage is a solved problem” point yet.

It’s hard to agree or disagree on anything if you think potential energy is a dam. Is a truck with water in it just a dam that turns water mass into thermal energy with it’s brakes to you?

Tak,
@Tak@lemmy.ml avatar

I really don’t understand the obsession here in comparing energy storage to energy production.

Do damns produce electricity with the sun? No. Do they produce electricity with the wind? No. They produce electricity via the rain.

The storage of electricity doesn’t have to meet energy consumption because that is what solar/wind/nuclear is for. The point of the storage is to form a buffer.

The first comment I posted shows how if you had 100 the size of the bath county plant you could run the entire US for hours. In just 100 of them. For the cost of the F35 it could be 300 or more but I am accounting for nothing but problems.

From the perspectives of the grid operator, renewables represent risk that destabilizes power delivery. Although weather forecasts are steadily improving and provide more leeway to prepare for sudden changes in the power supplies, the degree to which grid operators can turn on alternative power sources or alert customers to adjust their power demand is limited. In a truly “fossil fuel-free” energy system that relies exclusively on various renewable energy sources, the only viable means of addressing intermittency is to deploy energy storage.

Your source even agrees with me.

The absolute biggest problem with pumped hydro is that it costs a lot of money. Like, it makes nuclear look cheap.

Once paired and optimized for cost, the model returned 11,769 sites in the contiguous United States, as well as an additional 3,077 sites in Alaska, Hawaii, and Puerto Rico, where closed-loop PSH technology can be best deployed in the future. energy.gov/…/wpto-studies-find-big-opportunities-…

What’s 24gWh*11769?

It is a solved problem. The solution is just extremely difficult and expensive.

Tak,
@Tak@lemmy.ml avatar

I don’t want to argue about semantics. If the solution is too costly to be implemented, then it’s not a solution. I don’t think there’s more to be said here.

Yes you do. That’s been your argument this entire time. You kicked around all this time till now saying really weird things like how batteries are inefficient or that green hydrogen is from hydrolysis but then tell me what your point is all along when your point has been wrong from the start.

I proposed using 1.7 trillion dollars in funding in my first comment and now you’re arguing that I wasn’t discussing cost from the start? Is 1.7 trillion dollars not costly to you? Is the project being two times over budget not costly? Is it further not costly that even being twice over budget nearly half are completed? Now is the time you pearl clutch about cost?

You don’t engage in pedantry, you engage in belligerence.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • uselessserver093
  • Food
  • aaaaaaacccccccce
  • test
  • CafeMeta
  • testmag
  • MUD
  • RhythmGameZone
  • RSS
  • dabs
  • KamenRider
  • TheResearchGuardian
  • KbinCafe
  • Socialism
  • oklahoma
  • SuperSentai
  • feritale
  • All magazines