At every inch this moves along, I’m reminded of that one time Keanu mentioned wanting to return to a character that didn’t get enough recognition the first time around youtube.com/shorts/3bz543X9QYQ?si=HAE_pub-T722gvY…
Woot! Looking forward to this. I loved the first one, for the story and for the strangeness of things in it. Remember the clamshell e-book reader? Need more of that tech in real life!
That weird e-reader thing is one of the small touches I love about it. Among other things, it really gives the movie this out-of-time feeling. Which I think adds to the uneasiness of it as a whole.
Loved it. I think I read that they purposely did it to make it not able to place in any time period. No cell phones. Everyone looks vaguely 80s style. Lots of older cars. But then this weird future e-reader in a seashell? wtf.
Would They Follow follow It Follows if It Follows doesn’t follow They Follow? Of course, They Follow follows It Follows as It Follows precedes They Follow.
Ok, “follow” looks and sounds wrong now. I’ve said it too much.
To be fair, I haven't watched both films yet, due to me still being a bit broke in terms of money. Yet, to jestly answer, Something is indeed following both film's plots, one by one.
Slightly off topic, but when I first watched It Follows, I hated it. But when I rewatched it, it became one of my favorite horror movies ever. Do you all have this happen sometimes? Is it just not being in the right mood? Not paying attention? Growing as a person? I think for me I was annoyed with the character’s actions. But I’ve become way more lenient on what I consider “unrealistic” character actions. People in high stress stuations rarely make the best decisions and I accept that more in movies.
That app is shockingly bad. I do not pretend it’s easy to make an app, or expect that everyone’s app should be as slick as Netflix’s. But for a service that’s coming up on a decade old, it’s astonishing that I can’t even use it half the time on the most popular TV brand.
Yeah, the stakes in S2 were not as serious, and it had that “we got the gang back together with a flimsy plot because S1 was so popular” feel. Kinda slapdash like a lot of Prime series.
Neil Gaiman is on Tumblr and has answered A LOT of fan questions about season 2.
I'm going from memory and heavily paraphrasing, so look this up for yourself if you're still interested.
There was going to be a sequel to the Good Omens book, Gaiman and Pratchett had written a bunch of outlines and stuff for it, and it was going to be called 666 The Neighbour Of The Beast. Stuff happened and it was put on the back burner and never actually written, and then Sir Terry died and it couldn't ever be.
After GO got picked up for a tv adaptation of the og book, Neils' plan for if it was renewed, was always for GO to be 3 seasons, and to keep all of Pratchett's input.
Season 2 needed to happen the way it did as it's the world/character building and exposition necessary to set up the originally planned sequel- plus some incredibly well crafted fan service to keep it fresh. Neil told us it was going to be a gentle and romantic interlude (the bastard).
Season 3 apparently is going to be a lot more like season 1 as it's armageddon all over again, and this time they're serious. I think they're even bringing back jesus, who probably has more issues with god than Crowley by now.
I liked both for what they were. Season 1 was exactly what you’d expect given the authors and as a huge fan of discworld I’m very happy with it. Season 2 was a cozy love interlude and as someone who wants more good cozy gay content and watched it with her wife I’m very happy with it. Also the Job episode was wonderful
He could resolve it tomorrow by accepting the union’s reasonable demands. He could have resolved it weeks ago by accepting the union’s reasonable demands.
That’s true, he could. But I’ve seen no evidence that he’s actively fighting the union’s demands unlike Iger, Zaslav, and Sarandos. I’d love to see evidence to the contrary if it exists, though.
deadline.com
Active