@admin@lemmy.my-box.dev

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

admin,
@admin@lemmy.my-box.dev avatar

How would they be more powerful than in the current situation?

admin,
@admin@lemmy.my-box.dev avatar

Nope, they aren’t as universal as EFI. I think the closest comparable attack vector for “old tech” is a bootsector virus.

admin,
@admin@lemmy.my-box.dev avatar

Just like a gun.

admin,
@admin@lemmy.my-box.dev avatar

So tired of this bs argument.

When I learn to paint

… you will never be able to generate millions of paintings per day, so why even pretend it’s relevant here?

admin,
@admin@lemmy.my-box.dev avatar

You’re missing (or ignoring) the point of my argument. A human who learns from other work can only apply that skill in a limited amount. Even if a human learns to copy Van Gogh’s style and continually churns out minor variations of his work, they cannot produce dozens per minute. Let alone learn to do that equally well from several hundreds (thousands?) of other artists. There’s a scale difference in human learning versus machine learning that is astronomical.

I’m not sure what you’re going on about with “fear”. But I think that training a model on non-public domain content, without the permission of (or even crediting) the creator should be illegal.

admin,
@admin@lemmy.my-box.dev avatar

True, as did Terry Pratchett.

Utterly irrelevant here, but true nonetheless.

The employees secretly using AI at work (www.bbc.com)

Berlin-based business consultant Matt and his colleague were among the first at their workplace to discover ChatGPT, mere weeks after its release. He says the chatbot transformed their workdays overnight. “It was like discovering a video game cheat,” says Matt. “I asked a really technical question from my PhD thesis, and...

admin,
@admin@lemmy.my-box.dev avatar

Haven’t welding robots been a thing for ages? In a few years that bot can do your job, and figure out how to do it more efficiently while it’s doing it.

admin,
@admin@lemmy.my-box.dev avatar

Fair enough, I hadn’t considered repair job when I wrote that.

But if I were you, I’d be really careful about that “never”. If you’re old enough, you might have retired by the time your job will be replaced, but it’s going to happen.

admin,
@admin@lemmy.my-box.dev avatar

Large popups that prevent me from reading the content

admin,
@admin@lemmy.my-box.dev avatar

Because a vpn can monitor all the websites that you visit. Not directly what you’re looking at, but definitely where you’re looking. Just line your provider can, if you’re not using a vpn. But at least with your provider, you have a contract with them - you pay them to transport your data and nothing more. Some very scummy providers aside, that’s where it stops.

A free vpn, however, needs to pay for transporting your data somehow. And if you’re not paying for it with money, then who/what is?

See also Tom Scott’s explanation about vpns, why you probably don’t need one, and why he refused their advertisement money.

admin, (edited )
@admin@lemmy.my-box.dev avatar

I’m interested to hear what you think a vpn will protect you against. Or what you think the flaws in Toms arguments are.

Edit: I don’t know about you, but I trust my own, GDPR-backed isp far, far more than I trust whichever foreign based vpn company. Especially if they for it for free or cheap.

admin,
@admin@lemmy.my-box.dev avatar

The only thing you’re “protecting” yourself from by using a vpn to surf the Internet, is your own provider. It won’t stop any spying software on your phone, or any nefarious scripts on the websites you visit.

Tom’s argument was more nuanced than that, which is why I linked it. I suggest you watch it and explain where he’s wrong if you want to give your argument to ignore him any weight. Ad hominems and “imagined” arguments alone won’t get you very far, I’m afraid.

admin,
@admin@lemmy.my-box.dev avatar

You people get paid for solving captchas? :o

admin,
@admin@lemmy.my-box.dev avatar

By that same logic: it costs a couple of cents to burn a dvd or to transfer a few gigabytes, yet games costs $60.

All the commenter above you is saying is don’t mix up the cost to develop with the cost to mass produce,

admin,
@admin@lemmy.my-box.dev avatar

I can’t stop you, or even blame you for wanting this.

But in they long run, I think this kind of voluntary isolation is only going to keep the hatred escalating, or just simmering, at best. I say this with absolutely no stake in either party.

admin,
@admin@lemmy.my-box.dev avatar

I still think that would effectively imply isolation (at least, moreso than not doing it). What you’re describing to me still has a lot of characteristics of an echo chamber. And by spending time on that instance, in those communities, you’ll be spending less time on “generic” instances and communities. In doing so, those instances will, in turn, also become less diverse and more echo-ey.

Again, I understand your reasoning (except for the corporate censorship, there is none on Lemmy AFAIK), but I do think it’s a step in the wrong direction.

admin,
@admin@lemmy.my-box.dev avatar

No, it’s because the proposal for this new instance stems from the Israel/Palestine conflict - it’s literally the opening sentence. Whether they’re pro one or the other is irrelevant to me.

admin,
@admin@lemmy.my-box.dev avatar

If you think defederating everyone you deem toxic is libertarian, no wonder you think there are no authoritarian instances.

As the other commenter said, the premise is flawed, and the execution is worse.

admin,
@admin@lemmy.my-box.dev avatar

Doesn’t Tubular mean “reminiscent of the Mike Oldfield track”?

admin,
@admin@lemmy.my-box.dev avatar

“Piracy is a service problem, not a pricing problem.”

Gabe Newell, 2011

admin,
@admin@lemmy.my-box.dev avatar

It’s a browser. They have been getting weekly updates for like a decade now.

admin,
@admin@lemmy.my-box.dev avatar

Fair enough. I stopped using it ages ago, and was abhorred to find out chrome logs you in on the browser when you log in to Google at any point. Any browser that silently insists on knowing your identity as you browse the Web deserves zero trust.

Thank firefox for containers.

admin,
@admin@lemmy.my-box.dev avatar

Dude wrote a memo telling everyone just how fucking evil we are and tried to hide it. They then got caught and try play off that he was cosplaying an evil villain from a movie.

Do you have a source for it being a legitimate memo? I get that the message is embarrassingly close to the truth, but if what you say is true, they’d be committing perjury - which would get them into even more trouble.

admin,
@admin@lemmy.my-box.dev avatar

The article I read only mentioned a note during a communication training, no official memo.

admin,
@admin@lemmy.my-box.dev avatar

Fair use is any copying of copyrighted material done for a limited and “transformative” purpose, such as to comment upon, criticize, or parody a copyrighted work.

I don’t see why it should.

admin,
@admin@lemmy.my-box.dev avatar

No, but the training data does contain a copy. And making a model is not criticising, commenting upon, or creating a parody of it.

admin,
@admin@lemmy.my-box.dev avatar

it’s just a list of examples of fair use.

Yes, it’s a list of quite similar ways of commenting upon a work. Please explain how training an LLM is like any of those things, and thus, how Fair use would apply.

admin,
@admin@lemmy.my-box.dev avatar

Ditto, but with Resilio Sync.

admin,
@admin@lemmy.my-box.dev avatar

Well, he is an author. I can heartily recommend his books “Little Brother” and “Homeland”.

The End of Privacy is a Taylor Swift Fan TikTok Account Armed with Facial Recognition Tech (www.404media.co)

A viral TikTok account is doxing ordinary and otherwise anonymous people on the internet using off-the-shelf facial recognition technology, creating content and growing a following by taking advantage of a fundamental new truth: privacy is now essentially dead in public spaces....

admin,
@admin@lemmy.my-box.dev avatar

Use your real name and photo online, they said. What could go wrong, they said.

admin, (edited )
@admin@lemmy.my-box.dev avatar

The app rating in Google is currently 4.5 stars. I did my part in leaving a review, and got a nice “As our features grow…” pasta reply.

Edit: I’ve also downgraded the app to version 4.38 and disabled auto updates (both for the app and the firmware), and asked my housemate to do the same. That should keep things working for now.

admin,
@admin@lemmy.my-box.dev avatar

Isn’t that just a Philips subsidiary?

admin,
@admin@lemmy.my-box.dev avatar

TIL. Thanks! Weird that the app is still called “Phillips Hue” though. Probably a matter of time.

admin,
@admin@lemmy.my-box.dev avatar

My favourite VR app is Bigscreen - your own private big-ass cinema. Ever though the resolution isn’t as high as a 4k TV, it really is so much more immersive.

However my most used apps are workout games. It’s much more fun than going to the gym. The pricetag is pretty steep though.

admin,
@admin@lemmy.my-box.dev avatar

Spotify is moving slowly and carefully_ for now_,

Is that so? As far as I know, the last few years they’ve been turning formerly open podcasts (you know, using the official podcast standard, xml feeds and all) into Spotify exclusives. So that you can only access them with an account (profiling), and have to listen to ads or pay for premium.

You’re giving them too much credit / good faith, imho.

admin,
@admin@lemmy.my-box.dev avatar

Ha, tell me about out it. I’m pro-AI, but I’m also pro-artist. So I’m fine with people building all kinds of things using these tools, but I’m not fine with companies plundering every piece of content they can get their hands on, without permission of the creators. That is not really a popular opinion to have on here. Lucky for me though, I’m on a Lemmy instance that doesn’t allow downvotes. That does wonders for your state of mind :)

admin,
@admin@lemmy.my-box.dev avatar

I think it mostly a matter of “most of the copyrighted material belongs to companies, fuck companies”, as well as a little bit of “I have nothing to hide steal”. And of course a fair dose of “magic box makes pretty pictures, don’t take it away”. But maybe I’m just cynical.

admin,
@admin@lemmy.my-box.dev avatar

Probably. Human beings also died when we were figuring out organ transplants, and still do, sometimes.

admin, (edited )
@admin@lemmy.my-box.dev avatar

If you think that’s the primary purpose of neuralink, then there’s no point discussing this with you.

admin,
@admin@lemmy.my-box.dev avatar

Short term: giving people with certain disabilities control over their bodies. Things like allowing paralysed people the ability to move, or giving sight to the blind, etc. Long term: changing the way we communicate with computers and each other.

admin,
@admin@lemmy.my-box.dev avatar

It definitely used to, but I have been using my laptop with dual boot Ubuntu / windows 10 since last years summer (using either several times per week, and keeping up with all the updates), and not once did the bootloader break.

My biggest problem was chasing down the windows drivers, but after that it was golden.

admin,
@admin@lemmy.my-box.dev avatar

I think we’ll find our whether or not that is true will be decided in a trial like this.

admin,
@admin@lemmy.my-box.dev avatar

I think that in the end it should be a matter of licenseship (?). The author might give you the right to train a model on it, if you pay them for it. Just like you’d have get permission if you want to turn their work into a play or a show.

I don’t think the argument (not yours, but often seen in discussions like these) about “humans can be inspired by a work, so a computer should be allowed to be as well” holds any ground. For it would take a human much more time to make a style their own, as well as to recreate large amounts of it. For a ai model the same is a matter of minutes and seconds, respectively. So any comparison is moot, imho.

admin, (edited )
@admin@lemmy.my-box.dev avatar

It’s not the same as turning it into a play, but it’s doing something with it beyond its intended purpose, specifically with the intention to produce derivatives of it at an enormous scale.

Whether or not a computer needs more or less of it than a human is not a factor, in my opinion. Actually, the fact that more input is required than for a human only makes it worse, since more of the creators work has to be used without their permission.

Again, the reason why I think it’s incomparable is that when a human learns to do this, the damage is relatively limited. Even the best writer can only produce so many pages per day. But when a model learns to do it, the ability to apply it is effectively unlimited. The scale of the infraction is so exponentially more extreme, that I don’t think it’s reasonable to compare them.

Lastly, if I made it sound like that, I apologise, that was not my intention. I don’t think it’s the models fault, but the people who decided to (directly or indirectly by not vetting their input data) take somebody’s copyrighted work and train an LLM on it.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • uselessserver093
  • Food
  • aaaaaaacccccccce
  • test
  • CafeMeta
  • testmag
  • MUD
  • RhythmGameZone
  • RSS
  • dabs
  • KamenRider
  • TheResearchGuardian
  • KbinCafe
  • Socialism
  • oklahoma
  • SuperSentai
  • feritale
  • All magazines