This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

ram,
@ram@lemmy.ramram.ink avatar

It’s the heavy machinery required to do it that’s the problem. This is also not Elon Musk’s building, but a building Twitter rents. The building management company were the ones who called the police.

ram,
@ram@lemmy.ramram.ink avatar

Do you have a source on that?

ram,
@ram@lemmy.ramram.ink avatar

Rename Twitter Blue to X Pass

Rename the Post Tweet textbox to the X Box

ram,
@ram@lemmy.ramram.ink avatar

How long before we find out it always flags certain makes and models as criminals?

ram,
@ram@lemmy.ramram.ink avatar

Or an AI that’s pulling over cheap and old cars because the owners are more likely to get ticketed due to living in over-policed neighbourhoods.

ram,
@ram@lemmy.ramram.ink avatar

It’s entirely legal, yes. As people have been saying for years, you don’t own the games, you own a license to them.

ram,
@ram@lemmy.ramram.ink avatar

Ya I wasn’t really making an argument.

ram,
@ram@lemmy.ramram.ink avatar

It’s legal to end a license at your own arbitrary discretion if that’s under the license terms (it is)

ram,
@ram@lemmy.ramram.ink avatar

Let me know when you know.

ram,
@ram@lemmy.ramram.ink avatar

They’re gonna be NFTs come next week

ram,
@ram@lemmy.ramram.ink avatar

a lot of hate for capitalism here

The fediverse is largely populated by 2SLGBTQIA+ people and people of colour who are oppressed by capitalist regimes. The other big contingent is marxists and people who like FOSS. FOSS, at its core, is anti-capitalist.

You’re in a place founded by anti-capitalism, that exists in spite of capitalism, asking “why is there so much anti-capitalism here?”

How do we prevent bot2bot conversation on lemmy and fediverse?

As we all know there’s surge of LLM-powered comments, ranged from chatgpt-esque style to downright rude comments infesting reddit. It makes the place from unpleasant to extraunpleasant place. The problem I’m worried the most is if they’re starting to invade lemmy and friends. Any development to combat this? Like maybe akin...

ram,
@ram@lemmy.ramram.ink avatar

If we find instances infested with bots and unwilling to deal with them, we defederate them. It at least makes it more difficult to mass-infest the network with bots if we have basic things like captcha, email verification, and applications implemented in all the major instances. cough

ram,
@ram@lemmy.ramram.ink avatar

This fediverse at least. AT Protocol, used for bluesky, supports nomadic identity. Instead of accounts being @user, they attach your domain / home instance / whatever, to a DID. You can read more about it in their various spec pages but here’s the one for DIDs.

hybridhavoc, to gaming
@hybridhavoc@darkfriend.social avatar

Microsoft wins FTC fight to buy Activision Blizzard

https://www.theverge.com/2023/7/11/23779039/microsoft-activision-blizzard-ftc-trial-win

From the article, quoting Judge Corley:

... the Court finds the FTC has not shown a likelihood it will prevail on its claim this particular vertical merger in this specific industry may substantially lessen competition. To the contrary, the record evidence points to more consumer access to Call of Duty and other Activision content. The motion for a preliminary injunction is therefore DENIED.

@gaming

ram,
@ram@lemmy.ramram.ink avatar

MS isn’t even top 2 in a hardware market of 3. They’re not even top 4 in publishers either. Hardly a monopoly.

ram,
@ram@lemmy.ramram.ink avatar

The only time Sony’s ever had stronger hardware was PS3, which was a dumpsterfire that never even ended in a profit. PS1 < NS4. PS2 < GCN. PS4 < Xbox One (by a small margin). PS5 < Xbox Series X.

The only thing they have to their name is a bit of code made for their platform and not others, and the opportunity to buy a $700 headset that’s outclassed by a standalone $400 headset.

The best thing that ever happened to Sony was a) Nintendo using cartridges to solidify FF as a PS franchise, and b) Sega marketing Nintendo as “for kids” back in the 90s, a stereotype they’ve never been able to get away from.

ram,
@ram@lemmy.ramram.ink avatar

only wanted to make sure it was extinguished on other systems?

I hope you’re similarly malicious about Sony’s exclusives too.

ram,
@ram@lemmy.ramram.ink avatar

And nearly all PS5 games have to run on PS4. I fail to see your point.

ram,
@ram@lemmy.ramram.ink avatar

When did Xbox last make a game Xbox exclusive?

ram,
@ram@lemmy.ramram.ink avatar

Bitwarden checks all the boxes. I’ve had great experience with it. bitwarden.com

I will say, auto-fill on load is a bad idea. On desktop I keep my auto-fill bound to a key so it doesn’t actually end up in fields it shouldn’t be.

2FA is locked behind the $10/year premium if that’s something you wanted, but beyond that the free plan has everything 99% of people will use. They do third party security audits, have public white papers, and is completely open source.

ram,
@ram@lemmy.ramram.ink avatar

Bitwarden only autofills if the page’s URL is the same as the account in your vault. So it actually helps you make sure that you aren’t putting your info into a phishing site or something

This is true, though wasn’t my concern. My concern is that it (and other PW managers ofc) can sometimes fill in fields its not supposed to, and you end up accidentally including a username or password in a GET header.

although, I’m pretty sure autofill is disabled by default anyway?

Auto-fill on page-load is, yes.

ram,
@ram@lemmy.ramram.ink avatar

US Courts have already ruled in the past that human authorship is required for copyright. It’d be a logical conclusion as such that human authorship would also be required to justify a fair use defence. You providing a summary without any quotations would likely justify fair use - which is still copyright infringement, but a mere defence of said infringement. A machine or algorithm that cannot perform the act of creative authorship would thus not be exempted by the fair use defence.

ram,
@ram@lemmy.ramram.ink avatar

AT Protocol can do this in the way of DNS DIDs, but ActivityPub doesn’t have this functionality.

ram,
@ram@lemmy.ramram.ink avatar

Meta’s fine with transphobia. I am not. It can hardly be called a decision at that point, I don’t need Libs of Titkok and their ilk filling my federated feed.

What happens when an instance starts needing more resources than its original server?

Is there a way that users could cohost an instance? If there isn’t, I think that would be a great feature to implement. Having a situation where instances slow down or even occasionally disconnect will be hard on any community. I feel like it could eventually cause people to prefer using instances owned by large and well...

ram,
@ram@lemmy.ramram.ink avatar

Ram from ReZero Peaking from a Corner

I think this is going outside the realm of self-hosting and moreso into actually creating a server architecture. All servers would need to use the same database, so you’d want likely as its own server a database server, caches on the front-end servers so popular things aren’t queried for the same info again and again.

I’ve never set up anything like this, so this is just me trying to think of how I’d throw it together, I’m sure there’s a bunch of async problems I’ve not even considered how to tackle, and even having the DB be offsite from either of the front-end servers would be less than ideal.

I suppose you could have the DB in one of the servers, but then that one now has the same frontend-load as the other while it also is the only one doing DB queries, so the load’s not really being distributed properly. 🫠

ram,
@ram@lemmy.ramram.ink avatar

“usersurname”. I like that.

ram,
@ram@lemmy.ramram.ink avatar

Big L for the creator of Banal Wonderland.

ram,
@ram@lemmy.ramram.ink avatar

If it’s an ad: 40%

If it’s a SW: -15%

ram,
@ram@lemmy.ramram.ink avatar

Censorship is good in certain instances. Whether it be doxxing, revenge-porn, CP, having things ephemeral and unremovable by any means is bad.

ram,
@ram@lemmy.ramram.ink avatar

Ya, on Lemmy’s end there’d still be control over the removal of content.

Though I do wonder if it even makes sense for interop to come from Lemmy’s side? After all, Lemmy’s just one of many implementations of ActivityPub. Kbin, Mastodon, and other softwares can freely traverse Lemmy with varying levels of usability. Instead of implementing Aether interop from the Lemmy side and give Lemmy access to Aether content, it seems more sensible to make Aether interoperable with the ActivityPub protocol. Of course this isn’t exactly feasible without a maintained fork.

ram,
@ram@lemmy.ramram.ink avatar

There’s also many small-to-medium sized instances that just haven’t bothered signing that will be defederating. Mastodon.social’s gonna be one of the few who do, and I already think it’s fine to defederate from them too tbh.

ram,
@ram@lemmy.ramram.ink avatar

I’ve already blocked mastodon.social.

ram,
@ram@lemmy.ramram.ink avatar

Because the size of it, the sheer centralization around it, it creeps me out.

ram,
@ram@lemmy.ramram.ink avatar

I’d recommend anyone using this to really consider how much data this’ll use on their system.

How does the fediverse handle upvotes on different instances? Does each instance have its own count or are upvotes summed up across multiple instances if the upvotes system (upvotes/boosts/likes) is similar enough? (kbin.social)

In the latter case, I think it might be feasible to prevent upvotes from being counted multiple times if the username is identical on different instances, since upvotes are public. Is there already a mechanism to do this?...

ram,
@ram@lemmy.ramram.ink avatar

In the latter case, I think it might be feasible to prevent upvotes from being counted multiple times if the username is identical on different instances, since upvotes are public. Is there already a mechanism to do this?

If @dude upvotes and @dude downvotes, how do we decide which is the canonical vote? How can we say for sure they’re even run by the same user?

Also, isn’t it much more common in the Fediverse than on central platforms for the same user to have multiple accounts with different usernames?

This was the norm on Reddit too.

I suppose this would only be possible if the different instances would log IP addresses and share this information with other instances. That doesn’t seem desirable to me at all, and probably wouldn’t be legal, at least in Europe, because of the GDPR. Are there other possibilities? Cookies?

Let’s not inundate the fediverse with tracking cookies and privacy invasion.

I get where you’re coming from, but I just think that the solutions to these problems aren’t actually solutions, and they’re a case where the cure is worse than the ailment.

ram,
@ram@lemmy.ramram.ink avatar

Like what opinions?

ram,
@ram@lemmy.ramram.ink avatar

It’d not just break the philosophy, but the practical use of the fediverse. People use Mastodon, Peertube, and Lemmy privately amongst a friend group, or even on a LAN; maybe a small company uses Lemmy internally. Then they make it federated later, when they want more users, more content, whatever.

ram,
@ram@lemmy.ramram.ink avatar

FOSS Discord Alternative. Takes all the design language of Discord too without the nitro garbage. It’s still not fully featured, but it’s a cool little alternative if you can find a community you like. I personally am rooting for Matrix/Element tho.

revolt.chat

ram,
@ram@lemmy.ramram.ink avatar

“Social media company” means a person or entity that provides a social media platform that has at least five million account holders worldwide and is an interactive computer service.

I think it’s safe to say no single Lemmy or Mastodon instance will ever be covered by this particular bill.

ram,
@ram@lemmy.ramram.ink avatar

We have no evidence they’re not. Statistically speaking, as many as 8% of humans are potentially immortal.

ram,
@ram@lemmy.ramram.ink avatar

We have no evidence they’re not. Statistically speaking, as many as 8% of humans are potentially immortal.

ram,
@ram@lemmy.ramram.ink avatar

It really depends on what you mean? It’s a purposely, nearly obtusely, intangible concept. I’m not unwilling to talk about it if I get a proper definition, but my opinion would be a mere opinion formed from the facts I have on hand. I have some suppositions that are outside the realm of what science has been able to dig in to, but without actually factual backing, I also acknowledge that my ideas are conjecture that line up with how I perceive the world.

ram,
@ram@lemmy.ramram.ink avatar

What does consciousness mean on a material level? Do you just mean the brain? The brain does exist, yes.

ram,
@ram@lemmy.ramram.ink avatar

I mean, ya, if that’s how you wanna define a soul, I’ll say that exists.

As for the more common definitions which tend to extend to moving that software around and that software moving to the cloud in the case of a system failure, I have no reason to believe the brain has wifi, gps, or satellite functionality.

But if we simply describe it as “the software on the brain”, I hold no objection and can comfortably say it exists.

ram,
@ram@lemmy.ramram.ink avatar

Do both home and target instance have to be >=rc-9?

ram,
@ram@lemmy.ramram.ink avatar

Ya no that’s fair. I just moved from a personal instance to a self-hosted instance so it’d be nice to get my blocked users list back, personally

ram,
@ram@lemmy.ramram.ink avatar

Instagram’s never appealed to me, but it appeals to me even less now than it ever had before.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • uselessserver093
  • Food
  • aaaaaaacccccccce
  • test
  • CafeMeta
  • testmag
  • MUD
  • RhythmGameZone
  • RSS
  • dabs
  • KamenRider
  • TheResearchGuardian
  • KbinCafe
  • Socialism
  • oklahoma
  • SuperSentai
  • feritale
  • All magazines