Mastodon: @greg

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

Greg,
@Greg@lemmy.ca avatar

URL shorteners are but inherently bad. I find them useful. I self host them on domains I own. So they’re secure, trust worthy, I can track engagement, and I can update them if need be.

Plus, I’m pretty sure Twitter forces you to use their shortener. My URL gho.st was “shortened” to a longer t.co/blahblah URL 😂

Greg,
@Greg@lemmy.ca avatar

This obviously depends on the context. For instance, I’m speaking at a public event and I put a link up on a presentation to my website. The website is running on my nginx server so I could already track every visit. Having a shortened URL helps me gauge the value of my talk. It’s not black and white

Greg,
@Greg@lemmy.ca avatar

After over a decade on Android I’m going to switch to an iPhone for my next phone (once they go USB c). I have always bought flag ship Android phones and I haven’t been impressed lately. Awful customer service from Google with my latest Pixel 6 was the last straw. I don’t mind playing extra to make sure I have a working phone

Greg,
@Greg@lemmy.ca avatar

Yeah, I’ve lost all faith in Google and the direction they’re taking Android and the Internet

Greg,
@Greg@lemmy.ca avatar

They’re using a science-based process to update the maximum residue limit. That’s a good thing

Greg,
@Greg@lemmy.ca avatar

Mary Lou McDonald is a lawyer from an anti-pesticide charity, not a scientist.

Greg,
@Greg@lemmy.ca avatar

Firstly, the burden of proof should be on the person making the claim and Mary Lou McDonald offers no evidence for her claim.

Secondly, I’m not making an ad hominem fallacy. I’m not attacking Mary Lou McDonald’s character. I’m pointing out that she is not an expert in this field.

Greg,
@Greg@lemmy.ca avatar

I made two points above. Mary Lou McDonald offered no evidence AND she’s not a scientist. Mary Lou McDonald didn’t make an argument and provide evidence.

That’s literally an ad hominem fallacy lmao.

This is incorrect. Pointing out that someone is not an expert in a technical field they are discussing is not an ad hominem fallacy. That’s a ridiculous idea.

Protip: don’t get medical advice from lawyers

Greg,
@Greg@lemmy.ca avatar

Righto, get a lawyer to fly your plane 🤣 Qualifications and knowledge of science are obviously relative here

Greg,
@Greg@lemmy.ca avatar

Obviously! I never said being a lawyer precludes knowledge of science. Your comment is a ludicrous straw man 😂

Greg,
@Greg@lemmy.ca avatar

I never said she doesn’t know anything about science because she’s a lawyer. I’m saying that she’s not a scientist and she works for an anti pesticide organization. Both of those facts are important and not mentioned in the article. I never attacked her character.

Greg,
@Greg@lemmy.ca avatar

I think this is where we disagree, I don’t believe that clarifying someone’s expertise is an attack on their character. I don’t accept medical advice from people who have no expertise in medicine. It’s not a judgment on their character, is a matter of relevant expertise.

Greg,
@Greg@lemmy.ca avatar

She noted issues with the accuracy and relevance of the data used by the government in its assessment process.

She made this specific point. Her expertise is relevant to her statement as no evidence is offered. I’m making no judgement on her character by pointing out her expertise.

If a cop pulls you over for speeding and asks for your drivers license, it’s not an ad hominem attack. Context is important and there is nuance to labeling arguments as ad hominem.

Greg,
@Greg@lemmy.ca avatar

If Mary Lou McDonald was a toxicology expert her statement about the accuracy of the data would have more relevance. If Mary Lou McDonald had outlined the actual issues with the accuracy of the data her statement would have more relevance.

She is not offering details about issues with the data, so her expertise is important context.

The argument that expertise is part of character, therefore any mention of expertise is a fallacious ad hominem argument ignores the importance of expertise in giving context to a statement. A statement about health obviously has more relevance coming from a doctor than an influencer (assuming they’re not also a doctor).

Greg,
@Greg@lemmy.ca avatar

Can you expand on that idea? I’m not sure I understand.

Also, as a side note, I appreciate this debate and having my arguments challenged. Lemmy is great for more constructive conversations.

Greg,
@Greg@lemmy.ca avatar

Would you concede that in cases where no evidence is provided, a climate expert saying “climate change will affect x” has more validity than a non climate expert saying “climate change will not affect x”?

Greg,
@Greg@lemmy.ca avatar

What point are you trying to make? LLMs are incredibly useful tools

Greg,
@Greg@lemmy.ca avatar

There is a lot of Stack Overflow hate in this thread. I never had a bad experience. I was always on there yelling at noobs, telling them to Google it, and linking to irrelevant questions. It was just wholesome fun that briefly dulled my crippling insecurities

Greg,
@Greg@lemmy.ca avatar

not for solving technical problems

One example is writing complex regex. A simple well written prompt can get you 90% the way there. It’s a huge time saver.

for generating prose

It’s great a writing boilerplate code so I can spend more of my time architecturing solutions instead of typing.

Greg,
@Greg@lemmy.ca avatar

If anyone is interested in the actual answer, they are basically suggesting <REDACTED> which is really cleaver and will solve OP’s situation

Greg,
@Greg@lemmy.ca avatar

Isn’t CPU % is per thread?

TIL Alice Walton (Walmart heir) killed a pedestrian in a driving accident and was never charged. She has also been arrested for DUI twice but never charged. (en.wikipedia.org)

The sketchy part is not her not getting convicted. It’s that no charges were even filed. I also enjoyed this bit of info from one of the sources regarding the other DUI incident. Prosecutors in Texas have dropped a 2011 drunken driving citation against Wal-Mart Stores Inc. heiress Alice Walton.

Greg,
@Greg@lemmy.ca avatar

To be fair, a lot of the mega rich morons, Musk, Zuckerberg, etc are narrow geniuses (with a lot of luck). They’re just not self aware enough to know what they don’t know and they think they’re renaissance men. If the news media was continuously telling me that I was a genius, I might start to believe it too ¯_(ツ)_/¯

Greg,
@Greg@lemmy.ca avatar

It would have been better if the hippo pooped the 2yo out alive 3 days later

Greg,
@Greg@lemmy.ca avatar

Facebook is currently the social media defacto standard. Instances can always defederate in the future. The EEE argument doesn’t fit in this situation.

Greg,
@Greg@lemmy.ca avatar

How is this relevant? Meta isn’t buying the fediverse

Greg,
@Greg@lemmy.ca avatar

This highlights my point. This attack vector exists with or without threads. Facebook and friends can already scrape fediverse posts and map them to users. Defederating Meta instances won’t solve this vulnerability. Which is my point, people don’t understand the actual risks.

Greg,
@Greg@lemmy.ca avatar

Yes but the fediverse needs to be resilient enough to deal with bad actors. It’s a probably that needs to be solved for the fediverse to grow, we should run towards the challenges instead of from them.

Greg,
@Greg@lemmy.ca avatar

Facebook has open sourced loads of their internal tools, for instance PrestoDB. Open sourcing their internal tools is an advantage for Facebook as they get contributions from other developers. Fediverse tooling would fit this model.

Greg,
@Greg@lemmy.ca avatar

The “user kick start” argument is interesting and not something I had heard. The fediverse does have active users which is valuable for growing a social media platform. However, Facebook would only need to convert 0.1% of it’s users to the new threads and it would drawf the fediverse. So I’m not sure of that’s their angle.

Greg,
@Greg@lemmy.ca avatar

Facebook will do what’s best for Facebook. If Facebook joins the Fediverse then sharing tools to reduce spam will benefit Facebook. So I predict that Facebook would share such tooling.

Embrace, Extend, Extinguish is the concern, and it seems pretty likely that Facebook will try and take over the Fediverse by luring people in with propriety features

I don’t understand this argument. Who do you think would be lured from Mastodon to Facebook Threads? Is there a feature that Facebook could introduce that would make you consider moving to Facebook? I can’t think of one.

Greg,
@Greg@lemmy.ca avatar

I have no idea who Aaron Crowder is. Do you have a suggestion for a better meme template?

Greg,
@Greg@lemmy.ca avatar

I’m aware of the EEE argument. It’s just not valid in this instance. Let’s follow the EEE argument. Facebook extends the capabilities of activitypub and makes third party users no longer compatible. Then what? We’re in the exact same place we are now, Facebook having a wall garden and the rest of the fediverse doing its own thing.

Greg,
@Greg@lemmy.ca avatar

maybe the servers are just much faster, maybe the UI is more slick, maybe they’re the first to implement a load of the features we like from RES, maybe they sell you some extra content for that vendor lock-in

They already do this though, it’s called Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, etc. That’s why the EEE argument doesn’t make sense. The distinguishing features people keep talking about already exisit in a wall garden yet Mastodon has users. The features that Mastodon users want is freedom and control. Threads can’t compete with that but Threads can introduce millions of users to the concept of federation.

Greg,
@Greg@lemmy.ca avatar

I’m also using fastmail and I’m happy with them. Their native android email client is a little clunky but I still use it and I have the option to use other mail clients too.

Greg,
@Greg@lemmy.ca avatar
  • Open a Gmail account, send spam.
  • Buy a domain, setup SPF and DKIM, send spam.
  • Hack an SMTP server, send spam.
Greg,
@Greg@lemmy.ca avatar

Maybe a silly question but can I install this on mobile Firefox? The install link just opens up the js code

Greg,
@Greg@lemmy.ca avatar

The record to beat is 45 days

Greg,
@Greg@lemmy.ca avatar

The “If you use adblock, you don’t care about creator’s point blank” is such a stupid argument and complete misunderstanding of the economics. There are other far more efficient ways to support creators than watching ads. Watching an hour of ads will generate a few cents for the creators and orders of magnitude more for the monopolistic platforms that host the content. The ads model doesn’t fairly reward creators. I guarantee I give more to creators (via various means) than the misdirected “creator saviour” that wrote that ridiculous quote.

Greg,
@Greg@lemmy.ca avatar

I could probably get gold in the sprints

Greg,
@Greg@lemmy.ca avatar

It was never about not pooping for 3 days. It was about pooping 3 days worth of poop at once on some rocks

How do people disconnect from work when they enjoy solving technical work problems?

I’m struggling to disconnect from work. I’ve been working on an interesting problem for the last couple of weeks (compacting change data capture events from sharded MySQL servers into BigQuery). It’s an interesting technical problem. There are lots of optimization opportunities and novel patterns I can introduce....

Greg,
@Greg@lemmy.ca avatar

I’m sure I could turn this into an elaborate poop joke with “sharding”

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • uselessserver093
  • Food
  • aaaaaaacccccccce
  • test
  • CafeMeta
  • testmag
  • MUD
  • RhythmGameZone
  • RSS
  • dabs
  • KamenRider
  • TheResearchGuardian
  • KbinCafe
  • Socialism
  • oklahoma
  • SuperSentai
  • feritale
  • All magazines