BonnettsBooks, (edited ) to bookstodon
@BonnettsBooks@mastodonbooks.net avatar

Are you ready to chill for the weekend? Got your tunes in order? Your ear-holes deserve better than "programming" from a corporate A.I. If you can't make your own playlist,
try Rev. Cool's "Around the Fringe" Friday nights from 8-10p ET on WYSO.org.

8/11/23 — Open 6-10p. No open containers, please.

@bookstodon

exnihilo, to philosophy
@exnihilo@hcommons.social avatar
afouxenidis, to sociology
@afouxenidis@mastodon.world avatar

Recommended ⬇️

, and

"social class, for Karl Marx at least, is itself a form of alienation, canceling the particularity of an individual life into collective anonymity"

Eagleton, Jameson, Said

@sociology

exnihilo, to philosophy
@exnihilo@hcommons.social avatar
exnihilo, to philosophy
@exnihilo@hcommons.social avatar
Private
lupposofi,
@lupposofi@mastodontti.fi avatar

@lisabortolotti @philosophy @philosophyofmind Motivated reasoning and other biases can be useful and healthy, but that doesn't make them epistemically innocent. There is a crucial difference btw, say, and positive , and human flourishing isn't the only intrinsic value. A's allowing in her reasoning is a reason for B to lower her epistemic in A's , social- epistemologically speaking . Cf. also of .

EgyptianAphorist, to bookstodon
@EgyptianAphorist@mindly.social avatar

‘Who these days writes aphorisms?

Yahia Lababidi is keeping this art alive today — in times when morality is misunderstood and misappreciated —

Clearly a mystic with direct insight into the nature of reality, he simply manages to inspire.

A striking read that is a beautiful companion for anyone with a reflective nature!’

https://www.amazon.com/Quarantine-Notes-Aphorisms-Morality-Mortality-ebook/dp/B0CBCWV7HS?ref_=ast_author_mpb

@bookstodon

wildmandrake, to psychology
@wildmandrake@mastodon.social avatar

Here's a question that may seem simplistic - are corporations objectively real?

@philosophy





@psychology

PhilosophicalPsychology, to philosophy
@PhilosophicalPsychology@fediscience.org avatar

Latest papers: Valtteri Arstila argues against theories of the specious present. Such theories have not provided a satisfactory explanation of temporal experiences and their central motivation is lost https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09515089.2023.2241501?src= @philosophy

bibliolater, to histodon
@bibliolater@qoto.org avatar

Heather Ellis (2022) Classical authors and “scientific” research in the early years of the Manchester Literary and Philosophical Society, 1781–1800, Intellectual History Review, 32:3, 473-501, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17496977.2022.2055711 @philosophy @science @histodon @histodons

bibliolater, to science
@bibliolater@qoto.org avatar

Diego Maltrana, Manuel Herrera & Federico Benitez (2022) Einstein’s Theory of Theories and Mechanicism, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 35:2, 153-170, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02698595.2022.2130661 @philosophy @science

bibliolater, to science
@bibliolater@qoto.org avatar

Heather Ellis (2022) Classical authors and “scientific” research in the early years of the Manchester Literary and Philosophical Society, 1781–1800, Intellectual History Review, 32:3, 473-501, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17496977.2022.2055711 @philosophy @science

bibliolater, to science
@bibliolater@qoto.org avatar

Heather Ellis (2022) Classical authors and “scientific” research in the early years of the Manchester Literary and Philosophical Society, 1781–1800, Intellectual History Review, 32:3, 473-501, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17496977.2022.2055711 @philosophy @science

exnihilo, to philosophy
@exnihilo@hcommons.social avatar
bibliolater, to random
@bibliolater@qoto.org avatar

🧵 : this the first in a series of that will eventually be stitched together into a related to 📚 and 📘. (1)

bibliolater,
@bibliolater@qoto.org avatar

Johansson, I. & Lynøe, N. (2008). Medicine & Philosophy: A Twenty-First Century Introduction. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110321364 @philosophy @philosophyofscience @science @bookstodon (20)

bibliolater,
@bibliolater@qoto.org avatar
bibliolater,
@bibliolater@qoto.org avatar
bibliolater,
@bibliolater@qoto.org avatar
bibliolater,
@bibliolater@qoto.org avatar
bibliolater,
@bibliolater@qoto.org avatar
bibliolater,
@bibliolater@qoto.org avatar
bibliolater,
@bibliolater@qoto.org avatar

Pieper, C. & Velden, B. (2020). Reading Cicero’s Final Years: Receptions of the Post-Caesarian Works up to the Sixteenth Century – with two Epilogues. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110716313 @philosophy @histodon @histodons @bookstodon (36)

bibliolater,
@bibliolater@qoto.org avatar
bibliolater,
@bibliolater@qoto.org avatar
bibliolater,
@bibliolater@qoto.org avatar
  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • uselessserver093
  • Food
  • aaaaaaacccccccce
  • test
  • CafeMeta
  • testmag
  • MUD
  • RhythmGameZone
  • RSS
  • dabs
  • KamenRider
  • Ask_kbincafe
  • TheResearchGuardian
  • KbinCafe
  • Socialism
  • oklahoma
  • SuperSentai
  • feritale
  • All magazines