cyborganism,

They already support uBlock origin and that’s all I need.

KneeTitts,
@KneeTitts@lemmy.world avatar

On android I find its also a good idea to have a system wide ad blocker solution because android and all their apps are so inundated by ads, so I recommend dns66 (which can be found on fdroid) which has multiple blocklists you can subscribe to. This will cover some ads thats are built directly into apps and almost all ads that would appear in websites on a browser. This helps a lot since some apps will open a browser window for -reasons- and they sometimes have their own internal browser or they will just use chrome by default, not respecting your default browser choice, and in those cases you cant have ublock installed to protect you and those pages are so ad-overloaded that finding what you are looking for is next to impossible.

cyborganism,

Yeah I wish I could edit my hosts file for example so it blocks all advertisement websites.

raker,

Try Blokada

kamenLady,

I’m using dns.adguard.com as private dns provider in Android s network settings. Am i doing it wrong? I never see ads in any apps or browsers though… they are blocked everywhere

wahming,

Seems like many people aren’t aware that’s an option

time_fo_that,

I’ve got a Pihole set up running on my NAS but unfortunately it’s really difficult to find ad tracking lists that both 1) block ads effectively and 2) don’t break a large portion of webpages

hellishharlot,

Dark Reader too

gun,
@gun@lemmy.ml avatar

Whoa 🤯. Never realized this somehow. That’s awesome. No ads on mobile.

Moderator,

On iOS or just Android?

cyborganism,

Oh on Android for me.

theangryseal,

Oh my goodness that would be amazing. I’ll drop safari in an instant.

sebi,
@sebi@lemmy.world avatar

Unfortunatly, this will not be the case on iOS as Apple doesn’t allow third-party browser engines and stores

Powerpoint,

The EU is working on opening that up at least so there is a light at the end of the tunnel for those users

theangryseal,

Bummer.

I might get me a damn android.

I’m just buried in their ecosystem. Gah. I’ve been using apple computers and phones since I was a kid. I started on the Quadra 650.

My last mac (which I still use for music recording) was a 2012 Mac Pro. I’ve pretty much gone all in on the phones these days with a Steam Deck as my primary computer but definitely my secondary device.

I have photos on iCloud going back to about 2014 when I stopped jailbreaking my phones. Moving all of that would be no fun at all. Getting used to a new OS wouldn’t be any fun either. I hate doing anything on my uncle’s Samsung.

I really wish there was a third alternative. A good Linux distro centered around phones or something.

vzq,

I’m an iPhone man, but if weren’t I would be using Google Pixels.

It’s the most polished Android experience I’ve seen so far, and you can do literally whatever you want with them as they have unlockable boot loaders.

sebi,
@sebi@lemmy.world avatar

I also used iPhones for a long time until I had to switch to a temporary phone due to age-related hardware malfunction. Out of curiosity, I tried /e/ OS and was very pleasantly surprised.

The temporary phone is now in use for at least a year and I also get to enjoy other extraordinary features like USB-C and a headphone-jack. In the future, I may also give LineageOS a try.

noodle,
@noodle@feddit.uk avatar

It’s long overdue. I’ve been running Nightly to get around the shockingly limited number of addons available on Firefox for Android. Hopefully Mozzila don’t fumble the bag with this as its a great opportunity to steal users from Chrome.

raptir,

I do find it funny when people talk about how few extensions are supported, when it has the best extension support of any mobile browser.

Like I get it, but still.

noodle,
@noodle@feddit.uk avatar

Relative to desktop, it is comparatively few.

Best on mobile, yes. The few they allow in FFfA stable is a tiny amount considering how many actually can work, but Mozilla arbitrarily decided they won’t allow.

NickNak,

It used to be able to support all desktop addons but they for some reason took that away a while back

raptir,

The reason was they completely rewrote the mobile browser.

NickNak,

I didn’t know it was a mass rewrite, I just assumed they ruined the UI and features to “keep” up with mobile chrome, as most of these big tech companies do

willy096,
@willy096@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

This guys are just amazing!

fne8w2ah,

Didn’t their pre-version 79 app already support extensions?

ChaoticNeutralCzech,

Is still does, experimentally, if you enable developer settings, rather unintuitively through a Firefox Add-Ons account. Developer settings are not available in the official release but the Nightly builds as well as some forks, like 🦊Fennec, include them.

Gestrid,

I don’t know about pre-79, but their current version supports a very, very limited selection of extensions, many of which are to specifically improve the mobile version of Firefox. Currently, only a total of 22 extensions are supported, many of which share the same purposes.

Blackmist,

I mean, ad blocking is like 95% of the reason why I want extensions.

And the other 5% is blocking all those stupid consent popups.

Gestrid,

They actually have at least four adblockers available in mobile Firefox on Android: uBlock Origin, AdGuard AdBlocker, Ghostery, and AdNauseum.

nimitz1156,

yeah I’m actually disappointed when they stop doing that

Ivanovabr,

Yes. It did.

GyozaPower,

Kiwi broswer already does it, same with the Orion browser for iOS

Vincent,

That’s why the article itself adds the “major browser” qualification.

Ktheone,

They’re finally starting to recover from that crappy firefox 79 update 😮‍💨

notasandwich1948,

it does rn, it’s just a little more effort to get them but it’s not hard

Popsip,
@Popsip@pawb.social avatar

Awesome, I won’t need to switch to the desktop version just because I’m missing a few extension.

EmperorHenry,
@EmperorHenry@lemmy.world avatar

It supported desktop extensions before, then they got rid of that and now they’re going to do it again?

Ascend910,

Everyone forgets Kiwi Browser :(

OskarAxolotl,

Have been using it for years.

protput, (edited )

Kiwi is a mobile only browser if I’m not mistaken. This article is about DESKTOP extensions working on mobile. Firefox already supported a limited set of (mobile) extensions for a while.

Edit. Sorry. I stand corrected. Might try kiwi even.

QuazarOmega,

Well yes, Kiwi supports Chromium extensions, it’s the same concept

sir_reginald,
@sir_reginald@lemmy.world avatar
where_am_i,

No, no, no! It was supporting all the desktop extensions. For years. Until the damn buggy rewrite for no good reason. And then we were suddenly left with like 5 of them.

For a year after that I was still running the last stable release. But unfortunately the web evolves too fast.

Racle,
@Racle@sopuli.xyz avatar

At least with firefox beta, you can create your own collection of extensions and use those. That’s what I do and I can install any extension.

More here: androidpolice.com/install-add-on-extension-mozill…

landsharkkidd,
@landsharkkidd@aussie.zone avatar

I have it on Firefox Nightly with the dev stuff. It’s pretty great tbh

lemmyingly,

Not all extensions appear to be compatible at the moment. I know if I add a couple of my favorite desktop extensions to my collection that it breaks.

landsharkkidd,
@landsharkkidd@aussie.zone avatar

Hmm… interesting. I’m able to use ublock and two extensions for fanfiction. That’s interesting that it just breaks for you.

lemmyingly,

Maybe you’re lucky with your extensions of choice.

I’m not saying all extensions I tried adding broke the collection - only a couple did; the other extensions worked as expected.

landsharkkidd,
@landsharkkidd@aussie.zone avatar

Yeah I suppose so. I have a BUNCH of extension on my desktop Firefox, but I don’t need much on my mobile version tbh. Especially since I have a few extensions that work for websites that already have apps (like I have sponsorblock and pockettube for YouTube but there’s no point in installing them on my mobile FF since I have the YouTube app so…).

lemmyingly,

I actively don’t use the YouTube app.

No adblocker, sponsorblock, or return the dislike button.

I also don’t use the app for a website if the mobile website is good enough. Less software on my phone, so a reduced amount of storage used on apps, fewer updates, hopefully reduced CPU and battery consumption, fewer security issues, reduced data collection, and my phone is just a little cleaner to use. Everyone has their own preference, this is just mine :)

landsharkkidd,
@landsharkkidd@aussie.zone avatar

Fair enough. You’re a far stronger person then I am haha.

Blimp7990,

“no good reason”

spoken like someone who has never tried to use that browser. it definitely supported addons, but tried to implement 2015 features to run on 2002-tier hardware

ChaoticNeutralCzech,

It still does, experimentally, if you enable developer settings, rather unintuitively through a Firefox Add-Ons account. Developer settings are not available in the official release but the Nightly builds as well as some forks, like 🦊Fennec, include them. Of course the addon settings often look out of place on a small screen and things like uBlock’s Block Element picker do not work as intended.

Blimp7990,

fennec is just the code name for the rewrite, hence the fdroid built-from-source name

theres a limited number of available addons in fennec unless you go through hoops (used to be you could make a ‘collection’ dunno if thats still the dumbass-workaround-of-choice for the dumbass devs)

ChaoticNeutralCzech,

Well, the bizarre collection workaround is present in Beta and Nightly releases as well, and is intentionally well hidden. It also allows installing/uninstalling extensions quickly when testing on multiple devices, or sharing extension collections with testers. It is indeed needlessly convoluted for users but I would not describe the workaround as dumbass if it works well for the intended audience. You are correct, plenty of Firefox’s advantages can only be achieved by modifying the settings from defaults, often through developers’ hacky about:config keys. Mozilla thinks that mass adoption and their financial security is only possible if they make a noob-friendly browser with a few big buttons and Google search so tech-savvy people need to jump through hoops (profile importing etc.) to quickly set up the browser to their liking.

Blimp7990, (edited )

Its dumbass because if the addons work on mobile, let people use them. Instead they said “you can use these 5 addons, and you can use any addon you please if you jump through our hoops, like setting compact mode to enabled in about:config because we want to gather usage data that shows nobody misses compact mode”.

I’m *genuinely *shocked the folks at mozilla are even bothering to finish addon support.

Like don’t get me wrong, i love firefox and I support them in general, but holy shit is firefox gunning for its current userbase in an attempt to synthesize users that may or may not exist. And I think the way they manage these contentious choices is poor at best. Where the scale is from how-signal-removed-sms to the-windows-11-taskbar, they get 138.2.

Frostwolf,
@Frostwolf@lemmy.world avatar

As an iOS user and long time Firefox user (never switched to chrome in my life) I feel jealous. But one can only hope that we too in the APPLE walled garden won’t be left behind. Though I understand that it would be a long shot. :(

OskarAxolotl,

Apple doesn’t allow extensions to be distributed outside of the AppStore and Firefox on Android is based on WebKit anyway because neither do they allow third-party browser engines. So I wouldn’t hold my breath.

KryckA,

I’ve been running Firefox as my default browser on my phone since 2018 without webkit. Even other apps opens their links with geckoview. It started with FF Focus, shortly after FF Preview, then FF beta and since last year FF for Android.

Apple on the other hand…

Sources:

danielton,
@danielton@lemmy.world avatar

It’s sad to say, but the current restrictions on iOS are likely to be one of the last things holding Chrome/Blink back from total dominance. It’s already the default on Android, and it’s installed on most computers. So if a real Chrome ever shows up for iOS, web devs won’t have any reason to test on Safari anymore. They’ll tell their visitors to just download Chrome if it doesn’t work on their iPhone or iPad.

c10l,

If you absolutely want extensions, the Orion browser supports them.

Last time I used it, some bugs kept me away. That was at least a year ago though, it might have gotten better.

avidamoeba,
@avidamoeba@lemmy.ca avatar

Does this mean that the storage API will finally be available on mobile? At the moment this is probably my biggest annoyance since I have to manually transfer allow lists for various extensions across desktop and mobile.

Prethoryn,
@Prethoryn@lemmy.world avatar

I think I read that it previously supported full blown extension and they removed it due to some under the hood changes.

Draconic_NEO,
@Draconic_NEO@lemmy.world avatar

It did, legacy versions of it had almost full extension support and also even allowed you to install them from storage as xpi files and poke around about:config, then they took away both of those things completely in fenix (only allowing about:config in debug versions and blocking XPI install altogether).

DacoTaco,

Nothing to do with this thread just saying hello o7

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • uselessserver093
  • Food
  • aaaaaaacccccccce
  • [email protected]
  • test
  • CafeMeta
  • testmag
  • MUD
  • RhythmGameZone
  • RSS
  • dabs
  • Socialism
  • KbinCafe
  • TheResearchGuardian
  • oklahoma
  • feritale
  • SuperSentai
  • KamenRider
  • All magazines