It’s bigger than just Google as Passkey is being implemented by them, Apple, and other Big Tech, and it is all separate. Problems are you may not be able to switch between services, and it may force users choosing one of the Big Tech’s to use. Let’s hope more cross-platform providers like Bitwarden, Authy, etc come up with their version.
Doesn’t Edge send all urls you visit to Microsoft through browser.events.data.msn.com? Microsoft has been tracking every site you visit since the start.
The longer part of the windows install process is not the installation. It’s removing all the pre-installed bloatware, removing or disabling all the telemetry and other undesired features that are on by default.
The start menu entries are stored in an encrypted file somewhere beneath a thousand different folders. But its possible to copy a cleaned start menu file and paste it in the correct directory in the default user folder to give new users an ad-free start menu.
it decentralizes the cost to the central authority by pushing data load onto volunteers
the sad reality is that people will buy the hype
I have been discussing BlueSky some time ago with a friend of mine, and we soon agreed exactly on these two things. This is an excellent article, thanks for sharing this.
AP does push the data load onto volunteers (the operators of servers) but those volunteers gain some autonomy in doing so. The important part of that quoted segment is that bluesky has distributed the costs but not the authority, in other words taxation without representation.
@rysiek Maybe we could suggest server alternatives to people that complain about stuff.
e.g.: when someone says "hey, Mastodon is cool but I wish I could have quote-toots etc." we could say "hey, come to libranet.de, we have this, but also that&this&etc. And you can get to keep your followers and follows"
Yup. The problem is that these users will have trouble understanding how can it be "Mastodon" without being Mastodon, if you get my drift. Plus, ideally this would also be done by Mastodon-the-software project — "if you want functionality X, check out instances of this compatible-but-different software project."
But absolutely, doing so yourself in such cases makes perfect sense.
the issue of "too big to block" is an interesting problem for federation that i've seen no particularly good answers to yet (probably because it hasn't really been an issue up until recently). feels like there's a tightrope act nobody's mastered yet of balancing the desire to be where everyone is with the need to keep the whole system decentralized, while simultaneously ensuring everything can both interoperate as needed and moderate as needed without tearing the system apart.
Imagine believing that nobody really has to understand code anymore. Fine, give it a new name, but people aren’t programmers if they mostly use AI and don’t really understand how it works.
If they understand how it works, it’s just like googling how to program, which really is just normal programming.
When you are creating something like Lemmy, where you want wide uptake, you need to pander to the masses.
The /r/selfhosted surveys show around half of self-hosters mostly or exclusively use docker. A significant portion of the rest can use docker if needed.
If you’re in the 20% that isn’t covered by the most common setup, then it can be frustrating. But supporting that 20% takes as much effort as supporting the other 80% (see 80/20 rule), and when things are new it’s just not where the effort should be focused.
So you have all those servers, but why can’t you install debian or ubuntu server on one of them?
You could also get a $2/month VPS and run it on that. Beehaw is run on something similar (though apparently $12 a month, but a lot more users).
technology
Oldest
This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.