DAC_Protogen

DAC_Protogen, 11 months ago

Honestly… YouTube Premium is just wasted money. It’s a difficult situation. You can watch YouTube for free and without ads already, by simply using a decent browser like Firefox and installing the uBlock Origin addon to block the ads. (Google is fighting adblockers and anything based on Chrome, so 90% of browsers out there will limit their functionality in the future, btw. Use Firefox or something based on it to keep at least a bit of your privacy and freedom of choice.) And you can even automatically skip the sponsorship messages in videos with Sponsorblock. But if you think you would support the content creators with YouTube Premium, think again. You’re mostly paying Google for their servers / platform. A platform that treats its content creators pretty bad, finds all kinds of ways to not pay them / reasons to demonetize their videos to grab 100% of the ad income and has become more and more privacy invasive and aggressive with ads over the years towards its users. And in terms of music, YouTube doesn’t license every single song individually from the musician. They just pay a royalty towards huge labels and companies like Sony, which in turn keep the absolutely most part of that for themselves instead of paying the artists. Yes, by watching videos for free with adblockers, content creators and YouTube aren’t being paid and in a way you are part of a problem. But consider this: Any subscription based content service like Spotify, Apple Music and YouTube Premium starts by paying its content creators at least a bit of money, but uses bait & switch tactics to lower that payment per stream more and more over time. Once they have all the creators, music / content and viewers comfortably on board, they start grabbing the money for themselves. It’s a systemic issue with streaming platforms in general and always the short end of the stick for the very people who create the content that makes the platform successful and useful in the first place. And if you feel guilty for cutting off the often self-proclaimed “content creators”… YouTube has mechanisms in place to directly support them (while taking a cut for YouTube), like “super chats” and “super stickers” and most of them these days have a Patreon account for direct monetary support and sponsorships going on. But yes, only those content creators who actually offer quality content will benefit from these things, what about all the others, you may ask. Well, let’s be brutally honest. A whole lot of content offered on YouTube is bullshit. It’s either copying successful people’s video style, low-cost, low effort, low quality beginners stuff, clickbait, disinformation, mentally unhealthy nonsense, copyright infringing stuff, and these days even AI generated crap with no value. If all of that would stop being made because no money is to be made on the platform, we wouldn’t miss out on anything. True quality will always be supported directly by fans and sponsors. And as harsh as it sounds… the rest is obsolete and may fall victim to natural selection. Might even raise the quality of content on the platform overall. Feel free to pay for YouTube Premium, if it makes you feel better. But know that absolutely most of it will only benefit Google. Personally, I don’t have the money to pay like 130 bucks a year just to feel like a good person. And those aggressive ads are bad for mental health and sometimes are a vehicle for malware, aside from the technology behind them absolutely shredding your privacy. I’m having none of that. I’ll watch that stuff with adblockers as long as it works, and if that stops working some day, I’ll spend my time with something better, maybe going outside and touching grass or something.

DAC_Protogen, 11 months ago

I agree, the Doom 2016 OST has some great pieces! And let’s not forget the absolute ingenious Doom 3 theme song: www.youtube.com/watch?v=SzI7DLR0DPU

DAC_Protogen, 11 months ago

Reading this, I can’t help but imagine it could have been written by a golden retriever. And that is an oddly cute thing to picture. 😀

DAC_Protogen, 11 months ago

There, I fixed it.

https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/eb2c9782-c5b9-4c37-8fca-359b94f83769.jpeg

DAC_Protogen, 11 months ago

Once life has given you enough lemons, you become really good at discerning shades of yellow.

DAC_Protogen, 11 months ago

Blowing the seeds off of dandelion flowers into the wind :)

DAC_Protogen, 11 months ago

If you want a boring, pretty much dead monoculture of a patch of grass, you gotta work for it. ;) I think that real nature, including useful plants for bees and other critters have much more value. Children should play on lush meadows with flowers and interesting insects to discover, instead of a mentally and visually dull organic carpet, that is merely a facade for wannabe-perfection.

DAC_Protogen, 11 months ago

I’m super torn on desktop environments. There simply are too many great choices! I like XFCE, KDE Plasma and the most recent Gnome versions - for different reasons. KDE is the perfect choice when you want the full shiny, modern, bling desktop and if you love to customize it in all kinds of ways that are possible out of the box. When I spend time with KDE, over the course of weeks, I keep constantly changing my wallpapers, themes, cursors, icons, colors, etc. - just for the sake of variety. With KDE, the desktop never gets boring.

BUT… I also love minimalism (to a tasteful, practical extent) and classic retro computing, as well as efficiency. That’s why XFCE is very comfy to me. It only has the features you need, but still to the extent of a nice and fully featured desktop environment. Doesn’t eat too many system resources, still can look very pretty with themes, does what it’s supposed to. Very stable, too. There are times when KDE just feels cluttered and … too much for me, then I retreat to XFCE.

I’m running Fedora Silverblue for quite a while now and although I always had my gripes about modern Gnome… after using it for a while, it really grew on me. Since version 42, modern Gnome really is going the right direction. It’s nicely clean and readable, modern, performant, and once you get used to it, its different approach to the workflow really makes sense. The apps are lovely, they do one thing and do it well, and they’re beautifully integrated in the same design language. There’s a wonderful collection of apps called Gnome Circle, these are not developed directly by the Gnome team, but endorsed by them, as they’re useful and integrate perfectly into the UI design language. There’s some amazing tools in there! It all feels very unified, and with the Blur-my-shell extension, you don’t need much else for a pretty look. The only downside is that this clean look sometimes is achieved by cutting poweruser features, which can be frustrating when you bump into something you need to do, but the UI doesn’t account for. For example, I have multiple bluetooth adapters in this PC and can’t select which one to use. Still, great desktop.

DAC_Protogen, 1 year ago

Welcome to the new users :)

DAC_Protogen, 11 months ago

GLaDOS demands to be on the list, or you won’t receive cake.