Have you noticed how movies are getting longer?

Movies have been getting longer for a few years or so but they are especially long this year. Look at the biggest films this year and see how they are about 20-30min longer than they would be in the past.

  • The Flash - 2h 24m
  • Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny - 2h 34m
  • Oppenheimer - 3h
  • Barbie - 1h 54m
  • John Wick: Chapter 4 - 2h 49m
  • Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3 - 2h 29m

And even crazier are the 2 parter movies.

  • Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse - 2h 16m
  • Mission: Impossible – Dead Reckoning Part One - 2h 43m
  • Dune 2 - reported way over 2h

A few years ago this was different.

  • Action films like Indiana Jones, Marvel movies, John Wick and Mission Impossible used to be about 2h - 2h 15m.
  • Movies closest to Barbie like Clueless and Legally Blonde were about 1h 30m.
  • Biopics like Oppenheimer were longer but not 3h. Lincoln was 2h 30m.
  • Animated films would be 1h 45m max.
  • Lynch’s original Dune was almost 3h cut by the studio to 2h 15m.

I remember when Harry Potter Deathly Hallows got criticism for being a 2 parter. The Dark Knight Rises got push back from theaters saying it was too long and made it difficult to have a lot of showtimes. Now it feels like these long showtimes and 2 parters are the rule rather than the exception.

Do you prefer movies longer or do you think they are getting too bloated and need to be cut down?

Also what is causing this trend of long films? I think it’s streaming and binging making people more comfortable watching TV for a long time. But I see people say that attention spans are getting shorter thanks to the internet so I don’t really know.

Rentlar,

20 years ago, give or take 10, VHS video tapes were a major form factor for films and entertainment at home. Of course you could record for 8 hours at trash quality but you could get 2 hours at better quality. So to best accommodate films for VHS they cut them down to 2 hours max (118 mins was a frequent runtime for adult movies and 88 mins for kids movies).

leftabitcharlie,

I believe Peter Jackson has a lot to answer for in this regard. I feel like the LotR films were the watershed films for longlongfilm acceptance, and they are actually worth the watch in their longest forms.

But then The Hobbit films happened. I remember feeling that 3 films sounded ridiculous and that they were all unnecessarily long considering the length of the book and, compared to the original trilogy, they were rather horrible to look at.

ZephyrXero,

Yes, but also the ending of LotR 3. That felt like the longest ending ever

leftabitcharlie,

I don’t disagree, but I’m one of those that was tearing up and wanted it to keep going because I was so invested in the world and characters. I would have happily accepted at least a few more "fade-to-black and then continue"s.

tyrefyre,

Guns gotten mintier lately. Have you noticed?

Colitas92,

I prefer to watch films that are good to great, no matter the time as long as the artists know how to use the time well and make the work worth to watch. There is fantastic works that span the whole spectrum, from short films to lenghy films, and there is trash all the way too (Some director compared it to paintings, that range from tiny papers to whole walls). If we really think about it, any anthology series like Black Mirror and The Twilight Zone 1959 are just a collection of short films that share a theme, some recurring stage crew, and etc. If i am short on literal time, i have no problem stopping and taking multiple sections to watch a film (purists have some point that it loses a little of the impact some times, but most of the time it really does not).

I think it is 2 reasons for the trend:

  • Cinema-at-home technologies just keeps getting so much better all the time, and it is already pretty great. Streaming and 80 inch 4K OLED TVs are just the latest iteration of a process started in the 1950s with tube TVs, and if VR-AR glasses popularize they will be the next. Cinema Studios and Cinema-at-theater companies had to invent new immersive technologies and art forms to stay competitive, from the rectangle screen form (16:9) until IMAX 4-D etc. They also artificially benefited the cinema-at-theater by having the release window schedule (3 months in theaters, another 6 months to dvd, 1-2 years to tv, etc), that has been diminushed but it still exists (6 weeks to 2 months in theaters i think), and in our FOMO infested culture this might make theaters stay in the long run in some form or another. But overall, home has never been such a sweet place to watch cinema.
  • The endless rat-race to keep cinema-at-theater competitive with cinema-at-home has eventually made that only Blockbusters in high tecnology cinemas are attractive enough to most people, and to pay for all this sensorial spectacle that ranges from the theaters to the films themselves, the scale of capital costs in the whole industry has just risen to the roof, and now the tickets are usually very expensive (and foods drinks etc). The average consumer in turn, feels that going to a film in a theater has to be WORTH it, has to be better than home and has to compensate for the high ticket (and foods etc) price. This means that films have to be a Spectacle that is highly sensorial and lasts a lot of time to become a memorable Event in the persons day, week or month. So, longer run times.

There is a cinema industry that is already more advanced in these characteristics: it’s Bollywood, with the Masala genre (i.e. a spectacle that has to please the whole family, and they include at least some romance action drama dance music in every film) and many hours of lengh (4hr is not unusual). Because the average indian is poor, and they go to the cinema rarely, so the indian studios have to make it worth it, an Event for the whole family, like Hollywood has to now. There is also something of a Music Show vibe, where the audience cheers and claps when the stars appears on screen, and actively engages with the film throughout (booing a vilain , lamenting a death scene, etc), it reminds me of the marvel spider man 3, but times 10 and all the time, it’s a cinema-at-theater experience also unmatched by home, because of the collective element. Maybe Bollywood is the mirror that Hollywood has to emulate now, instead of the other way.

clutchmatic,

Intuitively your analysis hits the nail on the head. Studios need to justify the spectacle to compete with home theatre setups and streaming

favrion,
@favrion@lemmy.film avatar

Good. Maybe people will actually pay attention then.

I think it may be because of all of the high quality shows and films on streaming sites that people are beginning to appreciate nuance again. It’s also perhaps a backlash against short form content on TikTok and YouTube.

terminateprocess,

deleted_by_author

    •
    tourist,
    @tourist@community.destinovate.com avatar

    Apparently none of this got through to the creators of The Watchmen.

    terminateprocess,

    deleted_by_author

    •
    tourist,
    @tourist@community.destinovate.com avatar

    The movie. I’m pretty sure we saw the directors cut but also it could have been the regular theatrical release. All I remember is sitting there bored out of my mind and randomly being flashed by the blue thing.

    ZephyrXero,

    I’m gonna have to be that guy and say the graphic novels were way better than that thing Snyder made. But part of why it’s long is it’s an entire series being condensed down into a single movie.

    CeruleanRuin,
    @CeruleanRuin@lemmy.one avatar

    I went to Dead Reckoning the other day and afterward it occurred to me why I don’t go to movies very often anymore. With advertisements and travel time both ways, it worked out to a 4 hour commitment. I have kids. I don’t often have that kind of time.

    wheeldawg,

    Holy shit Oppenheimer will be 3 hours? Guess I shouldn’t get a drink.

    RocksForBrains,

    If you have the story to fill the runtime, it’s great. Give me bang for my buck.

    LazaroFilm,
    @LazaroFilm@kbin.social avatar

    They have to differentiate from long Tv show episodes. Some TV show episodes are over 2 hours long already. @chickenwing

    bane_killgrind,

    push back from theaters saying it was too long and made it difficult to have a lot of showtimes

    So with the volume of theatre goers and the rise of streaming and VOD revenue this is less of an issue

    HulkSmashBurgers,

    It’s getting to the point where they need an intermission.

    TubeTalkerX,

    Let’s all go to the Lobby,

    Let’s all go to the Lobby!

    Let’s all go to the Lobby,

    And grab ourselves a treat!

    CeruleanRuin,
    @CeruleanRuin@lemmy.one avatar

    I would advocate for the return of intermissions! Theater chains would love it, because it would mean more concessions.

    ummthatguy,
    @ummthatguy@lemmy.world avatar

    Logistically, theaters could include a timer/notification on an app for patrons to keep track before returning. Not to mention most venues have assigned seating, so no one loses their spot.

    HulkSmashBurgers,

    Yes the app idea would be great! Assigned seating does make it more feasible.

    happyhippo,

    Not just the past few years, OP.

    I remember when I was a kid in the late 90s, the standard duration for any movie was about 1h40ish. Which was plenty.

    I think this trend started in the 2000s/late 2000s and it kept getting worse.

    neptune,

    I think it was the dark knight and the LOTR that really kicked the trend into overdrive.

    But honestly it’s hard to make a movie with an action plot AND three dimensional characters in a hour fourty. One reason I think it’s good that the mini series or short TV show format are popular.

    Delphia,

    I think its a combination of TV getting better, audiences expecting more and the decline of cinemas.

    GOT showed that if you have a truly grand idea you can make billions with a tv show. Audiences want more than the old school “This guy is bad, this guy is good” storylines and who cares if its 3 hours long when most people have 60 inch 5k displays and can pause whenever they want.

    ShroOmeric,

    Most people have 60 inch 5k displays?
    Ah, the things you learn on the internet!

    calhoon2005,
    @calhoon2005@aussie.zone avatar

    I know right…guess I’m not most people.

    Delphia,

    Hyperbole

    You can also learn some really cool literary devices if you can spare the time.

    ShroOmeric,

    Really missed the sarcasm on this one. Glad to know it was there. ;)

    Slagathor,

    This is why I haven’t seen “The Irishman” yet. I like Scorsese, it has a great cast, and I’ve heard good things about the movie, but I can’t find the time to sit down for three and a half hours.

    Between work, kids, and just generally trying to keep on top of stuff it leaves little time to commit to a film that long. Recently I’ve been just watching series’. It’s easy to watch an hour long episode, or two, than to strap in for a really long movie.

    I have a long list of movies I’ve been “meaning to catch up on”, but the trend of longer runtimes is making that list longer and longer.

    Hogger85b,

    And then you end up on binging 4episodes and the film would have been shorter.

    snooggums,
    @snooggums@kbin.social avatar

    What if I told you that you can pause movies after watching for an hour and then come back to it later?

    HulkSmashBurgers,

    That’s pretty much what I do with streaming stuff as well. Long movies and sometimes show eps.

    HadenSteward,

    Yep. Recently watched Apocalypse Now Redux with my wife on a Saturday night and we got tired half way through. We just stopped it there and watched the second half on a Saturday night one week later.

    Neither of us had seen Apocalypse Now before. Hell of a movie!

    mouth_brood,

    I did this with the LOTR trilogy recently. Excellent experience. There’s definitely spots where it made sense to pause depending on how much time I had to spare. Watching it in 45-90 minute chunks and stopping at logical transitions made it feasible and enjoyable for me

    Slagathor,

    Yes, I know you can pause movies on your TV, and sometimes that’s how I watch them. I think it takes something away from the movie by watching it in segments, but maybe that’s just me.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • random
  • uselessserver093
  • Food
  • [email protected]
  • aaaaaaacccccccce
  • test
  • CafeMeta
  • testmag
  • MUD
  • RhythmGameZone
  • RSS
  • dabs
  • oklahoma
  • Socialism
  • KbinCafe
  • TheResearchGuardian
  • SuperSentai
  • feritale
  • KamenRider
  • All magazines
    •