Where can I NEUTRALLY keep up to date about the Palestina/Israel situation?

Looking at the two big news publishers in my country. One isn’t reporting about the current bombings at all, while the other one is phrasing their words mostly anti-Palestinian.

Is there some neutral coverage I can keep up to? Where do you guys get your info from?

donuts,
@donuts@kbin.social avatar

Probably nowhere, to be honest.

Today's Israeli-Palestinian conflict dates back thousands of years and combines politics, religion, race, war, and territory all in one.

If you really want to understand this from a non- biased point of view, your best bet is probably wikipedia, where different people with different viewpoints can debate the facts and non-biased writing is somewhat enforced.

The truth is that it's a very complex conflict with innocent people and some very shitty people, on both sides.

Stoneykins,

I haven’t found any, let me know if you do!

I just try to find all the information I can from all sources of all types, and then stress about my complete inability to be sure what is even true, considering how much of it is contradictory. The only thing I’m certain I learned is that neither side of this wants to tell the truth all the time, and new news will often change over the course of a week or so as people get caught in lies.

xkforce,

Reuters and AP are about the most neutral, reputable news sources youll find.

goat,

Highly recommend using mediabiascheck.

But if you’re looking for neutrality, social media ain’t the place to be, especially not lemmy.

Redditgee,

I’ll continue to recommend an app called Improve the News. It’ll let you filter things, but more importantly, shows you the source of articles, and explains different angles at the end of articles. Really well done.

kautau,

www.allsides.com does this too. It’s not perfect, but it does a decent job at showing multiple articles about the same current event and tagging them based on how left or right leaning the article is and then describing the difference in coverage from each side

QuarterSwede,
@QuarterSwede@lemmy.world avatar

I love the way they show you each headline and give you an idea of how bias they are. I’ll definitely be using this going forward. Thank you!

Usernameblankface,
@Usernameblankface@lemmy.world avatar

Is it a paid app?

Redditgee,

Nope! Free.

Usernameblankface,
@Usernameblankface@lemmy.world avatar

Just downloaded it today. Looks great. I especially like the option to filter out “who kissed who” and “someone tweeted a thing” fluff pieces.

Franzia,

I found Israeli news (in english, still) to offer a much less propagandistic view of the situation than American news.

lemmefixdat4u,

All I can suggest is to read many sources. Keep a mental tally sheet. See which sources correct themselves when they are proven wrong. Note how often they present provably false information. Try to look up the original source material (some will misquote or distort to advance their agenda). Look for widespread corroboration from other sources. After a while you’ll know how each spins their information, how well they vet their material, and their overall journalistic integrity. That will allow you to rank credibility.

Misinformation often has only one source, and that source will usually have a history of misinformation or extreme bias.

magnetosphere,
@magnetosphere@kbin.social avatar

If you find a reliable source, let us know

iforgotmyinstance,

So far nowhere. You have to read multiple takes and glean the truth within.

shinigamiookamiryuu,

There is no middle ground between their two conflicting narratives, so neutrality would be impossible unless you found a source that was criticizing every last individual who happened to be in the conflict. The closest you’d get is maybe a Bahai source, and I only say that as a tragically creative solution because Bahais don’t believe in discussing politics while being forced to talk about this because their leadership has been caught in the crossfire of the attacks, having shared a promised land with the Jews and being headquartered there.

ohlaph,

Read a few sources from both sides. It definitely isn’t a one sided situation.

stolid_agnostic,

NPR/PBS is generally the way to go. Some bias can creep in, but they do their best.

vinceman,

I think CBC has had very fair reporting on the subject.

elscallr,
@elscallr@lemmy.world avatar

This is a topic that has centuries of history, dating back well before the existence of either Israel or Palestine as countries. You won’t find a single source that can actually get into the thousands of nuances involved. Don’t think there are only two sides, either. Read from everywhere, make up your own mind, but honestly you’ll never fully understand it.

Candelestine,

Not a great idea to try. It’s theoretically possible but fraught with peril. Instead, it’s much more feasible to pick two news sources, one pro-whatever and one against, and check both.

There’s aggregators like (our sponsor,) ground news (!) that let you sort by stance and affiliation, that can make it more convenient.

If you must go with a shortcut, pick a country that is interested in the conflict, but not particularly on one side or the other, and read how its being reported there. India for instance, has been fairly neutral on this conflict, to the dismay of both sides, as they have economic ties to both Israel and the Arab world. They’re being critical of more or less everyone, and especially the British. lol Still not unbiased though, y’know?

So, it’s better to just check both sides regularly.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • uselessserver093
  • Food
  • [email protected]
  • aaaaaaacccccccce
  • test
  • CafeMeta
  • testmag
  • MUD
  • RhythmGameZone
  • RSS
  • dabs
  • oklahoma
  • Socialism
  • KbinCafe
  • TheResearchGuardian
  • Ask_kbincafe
  • SuperSentai
  • feritale
  • KamenRider
  • All magazines