Banana_man

@[email protected]

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

Banana_man,

If they didn’t why would they develop tools to federate? It’s obvious that the threads project was sped up significantly following musk’s obliteration of Twitter, so they wouldn’t go out of their way to implement such a feature if they didn’t have a very specific reason for it.

A company’s goal is maximization of profit, so don’t assume they intend anything else. The activitypub userbase is too small to be a significant addition to their userbase but in this way they can destroy it before it escapes their control. They don’t take risks. Mastodon could seriously compete with threads and it’s gaining popularity. If one more big boom happens it might be too late to stop the fediverse from competing with meta in the most cost efficient way possible. Do not be lured in by the false sense of security, meta wants us to help maximize their profit. We aren’t doing that right now so Meta wants to stop us (or limit us, whatever they deem more profitable)

Banana_man,

Nothing good will come of federating with meta, the fediverse should simply stay out of their reach and realize whatever potential it may have.

I think there might be another way to hurt it though that this article doesn’t seem to mention. Funnily enough, it’s also a theme of an asterix and obelix comic book, which the introduction referenced. This way would be monetization. Threads might try to “help” the fediverse by feeding the bigger instances money, therefore the hosts of the instances would be more open to negotiations with meta and accepting of their policies.

I will compare this to YouTube which started paying all it’s big creators until they became dependent on the platform for a living and then started slowly implementing more and more rules that limit their freedom of expression. Remember how much PewDiePie used to swear in his getting over it videos? In another “pew news” or whatever it was called video I happened to watch he directly mentioned that he censors himself because he isn’t going to put his job on the line just to say “fuck”. Profit invites creators to comply with YouTube’s regulations even if they aren’t enforced violently always.

The same pattern was used in the asterix comic I mention above. Ceasar decides to open a building complex almost next to the problematic for him village and so the residents flood the markets and are shocked at the low prices compared to Rome. As a result, the villagers start increasing prices and advertising their goods and services, neglecting their previous morals and ethos. In the end, however, the Romans lose again after (panoramix, I think?) makes them realize how much separation this has caused them, living only for their business. As a result they kick the Romans out of their village, once again united, and Caesar’s plans fail.

I think both these stories could serve as a potential warning to anyone who might consider selling themselves out if meta adopts such a policy.

Banana_man,

Just use a psyche processor on your Navi and then you can figure out the rest by yourself.

Banana_man,

Το επόμενο μεγάλο ΟΧΙ θα απευθύνεται στην Microsoft >:)

Banana_man,

Irrelevant but where’s the scene depicted from? It feels so familiar I’m losing my mind.

Banana_man,

Thank you omg

Banana_man,

Thanks I can’t believe I forgot

Banana_man,

I know and I’m not too impressed tbh. Never felt like talking to it.

Banana_man,

Unfathomably based

Banana_man,

It means that I find your statement or otherwise opinion based on facts and evidence, thus agreeable :)

Banana_man,

NONONONONONONO

WHAT WILL I TITLE MY POSTS NOW

Banana_man,

The people who run said shadier environments usually support banning sex work so they can get cheaper labour force :). Capitalism runs even behind the scenes.

Banana_man,

My guy these are sex trafficking victims, they don’t get the “choice” you’re mentioning. They were either kidnapped or scammed into doing this, meaning forced. But you’re probably a troll so I won’t elaborate lol.

Banana_man,

What about African swallows?

Banana_man,

Sir you can’t be @'d, you’re in Lemmy but I agree

Banana_man,

Literally how is china communist other than the name

Banana_man,

I made the executive decision to walk both ways. It’s very cool, would recommend.

Whatsapp has begun working on support for third party chats (Telegram/Signal) (wabetainfo.com)

The European Union has recently reached an agreement on a significant competition reform known as the Digital Markets Act (DMA), which will impose strict rules on large tech companies that will have to offer users the ability to communicate with each other using different apps. WhatsApp is one of the companies that will be...

Banana_man,

I agree with you but look at the dude’s name, they probably are a troll. Regardless, watching the debate between ILikeBoobies and MrBusinessMan, the two sages has been thrilling.

Privacy basics, can anyone help?

Hello there! Im looking for increased privacy when it comes to my network connections. So far I know of TOR as an almost absolute bastion of security, but how do I ensure the remaining network traffic is encrypted and private? I know of signal for communication, and I’m aware of VPN’s. However I’m not sure whether to trust...

Banana_man,

I’m pretty much also a beginner when it comes to privacy so I’d be gladly corrected, but if you read the Tor manual you’ll see it works best on its own. VPNs offer very limited protection and if you’re looking to reinforce Tor, you might want to look into Tails instead, since Tor is meant to work on its own.

A good first point to make is your operating system. Ditching proprietary software is a must there as well since they have back doors from which they can steal most of your data anyway. Use a Linux distro, preferably not Ubuntu based, however it might be a little harder to use and the difference is not that big afaik. Ubuntu hasn’t given us reason to worry other than that it’s developed by a for profit company, in addition to some additions that were not considered ideal by the open source Linux users. I am typing from memory of some videos I watched though, so if you’re looking for a distro you best do your own research.

One additional necessity is encryption. Use it everywhere you can. Proton mail and other such providers encrypt your emails and allow only the recipient to read them. You can also encrypt your hard drives to protect the information inside them. De-google your devices and use as much open source software as you can. Newpipe or YouTube revanced should be installed instead of the official yt app, Lemmy(as you know lol) instead of reddit, Instagram or any other social media, however this can be hard to execute so what you might want to do instead is delete the apps from your phone and log in to your accounts from a browser that isn’t Tor, since logging in with Tor defeats it’s purpose completely. Alternatively you can use clients for some like frost for Facebook and, as previously mentioned, newpipe or yt revanced.

Finally, you might want to set up a Tor network server in your residence, as it helps hide your own traffic among the others using it. Additionally, the more wide the Tor network is, the more efficient blending in the crowd becomes. In fact, this is tor’s biggest strength. Using any extensions and add-ons to the browser can help make you stand out from the other users and allow others to track you.

Sorry for the long response not necessarily explaining what you were originally asking for, network privacy. But if you are to make your online computing private you must shield yourself from all directions and not leave back doors open at all. It’s not all or nothing but it certainly isn’t a one click wonder either.

TL DR: Leave Tor as is with the strongest default privacy and security settings, replace closed source apps with open source ones(like clients) and get a privacy respecting OS for both phone and PC.

Banana_man,

Isn’t a secure operating system essential anyway though? Like, can any decent privacy level be achieved on a windows computer?

Banana_man,

I never bothered checking edge’s TOS and data collection since I never considered using it in the first place so idk how bad it is :p.

But also can’t the person you’re hiding from also buy your data from Microsoft anyway? I mean, they collect them to sell, not only store. Your metadata are the ones they go after first right? Easy to store and analyze, usually betray behavior patterns etc.

Having said that, I do get your point and maybe it does depend on who you want to protect yourself against. But I’m just asking to verify my own knowledge.

Banana_man,

Maybe but at the end, user data is bought and sold by corporations, so if you avoid a few collecting them that doesn’t mean you’ll be private.

Banana_man,

I’m not American so I’m happy to hear that the veterans know why they went thru it at least.

Banana_man,

With enough propaganda, any of them.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • uselessserver093
  • Food
  • aaaaaaacccccccce
  • test
  • CafeMeta
  • testmag
  • MUD
  • RhythmGameZone
  • RSS
  • dabs
  • KamenRider
  • TheResearchGuardian
  • KbinCafe
  • Socialism
  • oklahoma
  • SuperSentai
  • feritale
  • All magazines