pyrex, to random
@pyrex@dragon.style avatar

Stop Using Threads consumes a list of users and tells you which of those users interact with Threads. You can use it to remove Threads participants from your timeline.

You can find out the tool's opinion on you by entering your own name, or you can just Submit with default settings to find out about Gargron.

https://stop-using-threads.net/

Data practices, anti-abuse and opt-in/out are behind the link. If you didn't opt into search, you're not visible here either.

bbbhltz, to fediverse in Collecting feedbacks about fediverse experience
@bbbhltz@beehaw.org avatar

I am on Mastodon, Lemmy and PixelFed.

  • Difficulties: On Mastodon I had two accounts on different instances. It took some some to decide which to keep and which to deactivate. Not a big problem, as I am not a very active user.
    I’ve been using Lemmy since the early days. It was harder to choose an instance on Lemmy than Mastodon.
    I have never managed to find a PeerTube instance that I could use for uploading.
    So, main difficulty would be time spent lookin for instances.
  • Challenges: I have never really spent time trying to attract users. When describing it to some people they liked the idea, but wouldn’t move to a social network where their friends were not.
  • Experience: Positive overall. I have had exactly one confusing problem with another user. I will say that there are some strongly opinionated people on Fedi. Instances do create groupthink which can lead to biases, but I was aware of that before onboarding.
  • Feedback: The Fediverse is a good social network for many different people. It appears to me that Fedi can be quite welcoming to neurodivergent and LGBTQ+ communities. There is a political leaning, at least on the instances I see. I wouldn’t say there is a slant, but when opposing opinions collide, wording matters because is a thing. I am of the opinion that improvement should come about organically. Forcing changes is pointless, unless you are a developer who can suggest a way to make the improvement a reality.
    New users to Mastodon (and Fedi as a whole) need to understand that “quote-tooting” isn’t a thing, monetisation isn’t a goal, and it will never be a 1:1 clone of Twitter, Reddit or Instagram.
jerry, to random
@jerry@infosec.exchange avatar

childlove.space. Hopefully this does not require further explanation.

CoachKahnsef, (edited )
@CoachKahnsef@infosec.exchange avatar

@jerry gross, thanks for the

ixi, to random
@ixi@mastodon.online avatar

bassam.social is begging for a heavy dose of reporting and a domain block, it seems...

https://bassam.social/notice/AaXPCuYSq558n0TuRU



admin, to random
@admin@mastodon.ai8w.ddns.net avatar

@smitty @jerry @stux

Any of you getting connection requests from a "VIVIT" (or something similar) whose BIO states it's a bot created to connect with admins of servers? Seems sus to me.

Please let me know.

Edited to correct spelling and punctuation.

admin,
@admin@mastodon.ai8w.ddns.net avatar

@jerry @smitty @stux

BUT, if I search the tag on other servers I have accounts on, I get the results you show.

So.. either my server is misconfigured somehow, or I'm SO blocked that I can't see any of the people who are talking about the in the first place.

At least I've got my answer...

vyr, to random
@vyr@infosec.exchange avatar

Fediblock rec: chaotic.ninja kishinjou.chaotic.ninja makai.chaotic.ninja

followbot + admin actively interacts with cawfee club, nyanide, other T0 instances

jerry, to random
@jerry@infosec.exchange avatar
stux, to random
@stux@mstdn.social avatar

This is a real, real bad one. It seems an instance dedicated to CSAM and should be suspended right away!

"pettanko.art"

bishop, to random
@bishop@mastodon.myocci.social avatar

today banned my account in a blatant show of bigotry. They hide behind the fact that I asked for help to get my meds, but they have routinely shown bigotry and hatred to LGBT posters. I am banning them on my instance and calling for a until they reverse my account ban and pledge to stop targeting LGBT members of the community.

bishop,
@bishop@mastodon.myocci.social avatar

They also give out a defunct email to send appeals to. This should violate the Mastodon Code many of us admins signed in to. But why call out bad behavior when you can foster it in large instances.

image/png

mastodon.art defederating calckey firefish social. Cites behavior of lead project dev (dotart.blog)

mastodon.art has decided to suspend firefish.social from their instance due to issues with its administrator. The administrator of firefish.social was found to be boosting posts from a known harasser on another instance. mastodon.art takes a firm stance against racism and suspending full instances in these situations is part of...

kukkurovaca, to fediverse in mastodon.art defederating calckey firefish social. Cites behavior of lead project dev
@kukkurovaca@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

The actual issue is, that as an instance admin who had previously been in the loop for some time with and other channels in which admins share this kind of info, folks expected him to already have disqordia blocked.

Also, it seems from his posts elsewhere that he actually was aware and didn’t care. Ample reason to defederate from .art’s perspective. (Firefish.social has subsequently silenced but not blocked disqordia)

All of this is relatively routine, the screenshot fabrication thing more unusual.

gabboman, to random

fediblock mastodon dot art

the admin team and their cronies harrass other admin instances and their admins who federates with people who they do not like, like eris disqordia.

"I get not liking eris disqordia but that's just unnecessary".

You do not have to like eris, but eris is not hitlerfan69 at germany1930rp dot ru and does not deserve such reaction

nacho, to random Spanish
@nacho@frankenwolke.com avatar

Pues como el gato ha tenido a bien despertarme a las seis de la mañana he aprovechado el insomnio forzado para automatizar por fin las blocklists de @oliphant en mi nodo.
He seguido esta guía que está bastante bien explicada y desde ahora todas las noches desfedero automáticamente la blocklist tier0 más todos los clones de bird.makeup que vayan saliendo:
https://writer.oliphant.social/oliphant/how-to-sync-up-blocklist-changes-from-trusted-sources

Stanford researchers find Mastodon has a massive child abuse material problem (www.theverge.com)

Mastodon, an alternative social network to Twitter, has a serious problem with child sexual abuse material according to researchers from Stanford University. In just two days, researchers found over 100 instances of known CSAM across over 325,000 posts on Mastodon. The researchers found hundreds of posts containing CSAM related...

FlashMobOfOne, (edited ) to technology in Stanford researchers find Mastodon has a massive child abuse material problem
@FlashMobOfOne@beehaw.org avatar

Mastodon.art doesn’t.

And the beauty of Mastodon is you can block an entire instance, as can your admin, when something awful is posted. Mastodon even has a hashtag they use as an alert for this kind of thing. (#Fediblock)

GjikaPhD, to sociology
@GjikaPhD@mstdn.social avatar
rjt,
@rjt@climatejustice.social avatar

@cat_static @GjikaPhD @sociology @communicationscholars This excerpt sounds good in theory, but I'm not sure it is possible when literally anyone can download, install, and run a #Mastodon instance on their own. From what I have seen over the last year, #FediBlock does indeed work as a pretty good safety measure by large, but even that can't stop anyone from starting their own instance. What this writer is suggesting would require a complete revision of how Mastodon works. I suppose with the right programming anything is possible.

rjt,
@rjt@climatejustice.social avatar

@cat_static @GjikaPhD @sociology @communicationscholars It should go without saying that just about everyone would take the safety of children over 100% #OpenSource. What this requires, and what I don't think these researchers realize, is that it would require @Gargron to rewrite #Mastodon in such a way that even the open source software would prevent complete free-for-all use. I would be surprised if @Gargron would be willing do that, instead relying on #FediBlock, but it should be something that should be researched.

kukkurovaca, to fediverse in Re: Defederation - Does Lemmy need a charter?
@kukkurovaca@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

I don’t know that a formal charter is required, but I do think that it is important that all instance admins do a couple of things:

  • Develop and publish a moderation policy in some form
  • Determine and publish criteria by which they decide when to defederate from another instance

There isn’t one right answer for either of those things, and the point isn’t to ensure everybody passes a purity test. It’s to set expectations for users on the instance, users on other instances who may participate in communities on the instance, and other instance admins.

Well-thought-out policies will be copied and forked by other new instances, and that will create consensus communities of instances that are at least on the same page when it comes to how a site is supposed to work.

It will also be helpful for the community to be able to talk about things like what instances have a lot of bad actors or poor moderation, something similar to on Mastodon. The issues that mods face and that individuals targeted for harassment face are often invisible to the average joe user, and can also be invisible to admins if they aren’t actively encountering reports themselves. creates a place – sometimes fractious, yes – where folks can ensure that those issues are visible and give admins an opportunity to determine whether or not they need to take action.

Vilian, to fediverse in Re: Defederation - Does Lemmy need a charter?

fully support the #fediblock ideia, i can even resolve bots problem

KbinCafe, to random
ey, to random
@ey@mstdn.ca avatar

meta threads seems to be launching a little early? i thought it was 10 ET tomorrow?

#meta #threads #p92 #fediblock #fedipact #metathreads #metap92 #metaproject92

danny, to random
@danny@strangeminds.social avatar

Why all the panic about blocking this new social platform (can't remember what it's called) created by Meta.....just because it's created by Meta?

user8e8f87c, to fediversenews
@user8e8f87c@berlin.social avatar

FYI: There is a far right libertarian instance, where right-wing people spread right-wing lies and conspiracy crap. Maybe you should defederate.

https://liberdon.com/

You can also block on individual level.

@fediversenews

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • uselessserver093
  • random
  • Food
  • aaaaaaacccccccce
  • test
  • CafeMeta
  • testmag
  • MUD
  • RhythmGameZone
  • RSS
  • dabs
  • KamenRider
  • Socialism
  • KbinCafe
  • oklahoma
  • TheResearchGuardian
  • SuperSentai
  • feritale
  • All magazines