Honestly, even if it were legal, who would be able to afford it? It’d just mean the ultra wealthy would have even more powerful private armies. A single missile costs at least a few hundred thousand dollars, with some systems costing millions per missile. Which is unfathomably expensive when you think of what you can buy with a few million dollars.
The only logical conclusion is that civilians should be able to, nay mandated to, own anti-aircraft missiles. And while we’re at it anti-tank missiles too.
Imagine if every single person in Ukraine had had anti-aircraft and anti-tank missles.
I see “Группа бойкиссера” which you could translate to “boykisser group” but “бойкиссера” seems to be a transliteration for “boykisser” not a translation. So when it’s spoken it will sound something like “[Russian word for group] Boykisser.”
Chris Christie is running for president. His polling is abysmal, but who knows what happens if Trump's support collapses.
Zelensky doesn't want to appear partisan and risk alienating the republican party in the middle of a war, given Ukraine relies on continued US support, so he'll happily shake the hand of anyone and everyone if that helps.
noncredibledefense
Hot
This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.