dannyboy5498,

I like Reborn OS. It’s like Manjaro but more user customisable.

jkmooney,
@jkmooney@kbin.social avatar

I've used both. Manjaro, in their attempt to be "user friendly", winds up disconnecting you from what makes Arch good. EndeavorOS, on the other hand, is basically Arch nicely set up for a "daily driver" PC along with some nice tools of their own you can use or not at your discretion. I've also used just plain Arch and I actually prefer EndeavourOS of the three.

the16bitgamer,

TBH I want “user friendly” with up to date drivers. Most Ubuntu bases distros dont offer that and fedora doesn’t have the same support with copr that AUR has.

While I don’t agree with Manjaro’s parent company, as someone who doesn’t want to tinker with their os, I prefer it.

crystalshower,

I choose Endeavor because it’s basically Arch with GUI.

Sentau,

*GUI installer. Post install it does not even ship the gui software center of your DE

yote_zip,
@yote_zip@pawb.social avatar

Manjaro is remarkably bad. One of the few distros I actively caution people to avoid: One, Two, Three, Four

brihuang95,
@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz avatar

holy cow i had no idea manjaro was this bad

CandyRushSweetest,
@CandyRushSweetest@mastodon.social avatar

@yote_zip @neurodivergentAF lot’s of instability. Understandable. I’ll probably steer clear, if not completely away, from Manjaro :/

neurodivergentAF,

I was expecting the responses to be more mixed. But pretty much the issues I see here confirms to me that Manjaro is not the winner. I think Endeavour is going to be the one I will install.

brihuang95,
@brihuang95@sopuli.xyz avatar

FWIW i’ve been using endeavouros for about a month and i’m absolutely in love with it. their installer is super easy to use and i’m just liking how lightweight and customizable arch is

Patroopa,

Never tried Manjaro, but i’ll give my 2 cents too. I’m using Endeavour, and i’m happy with it.

Urist, (edited )
@Urist@lemmy.ml avatar

After migrating from Solus a while ago I tried Manjaro, but quickly decided Endeavour OS seemed better. I mostly wanted Arch with some sane defaults so I think it was a better fit for me. However, I think plain Arch is also a strong contender despite IMO more annoying setup. I have had some issues with keys not syncing properly from the EOS repository.

nodiet,

I have switched from manjaro to endeavouros about a month ago. I definitely prefer endeavouros. However, the kernel install GUI in manjaro was nice, made it very easy to get an overview of the available kernels and which ones are still getting support.

donut4ever,

I ran Manjaro for over a year. It’s considerably slower than endeavourOS. I don’t know why, but the system was always sluggish and always broke for me. Also, I don’t think that their stable branch is a rolling release anymore. They wait over a month to push updates, sometimes even longer. I’ve been running EOS for about a year now. Zero issues. Light as hell. You may have to install some things, but I like it a lot. And if you don’t feel comfortable using the terminal all the time, just install octopi. Some people hate it, but I love it. Much better than Manjaro’s buggy Pamac. Only downside of octopi is that it doesn’t support flatpaks. For that I’ve installed discover with the packegkit and I’m good on flatpak. It also works very well with the AUR/EOS/Arch repos.


<span style="color:#323232;">yay -S octopi
</span>

is all you need for it, btw.

odium,

Endeavour

ToNIX,

EndeavourOS is the right answer.

djsaskdja,

EndeavourOS is my preference. I appreciate that they don’t really modify the Arch experience in any annoying way. Manjaro seems to always break shit. Plus the EOS forums are amazing.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • uselessserver093
  • Food
  • [email protected]
  • aaaaaaacccccccce
  • test
  • CafeMeta
  • testmag
  • MUD
  • RhythmGameZone
  • RSS
  • dabs
  • oklahoma
  • Socialism
  • KbinCafe
  • TheResearchGuardian
  • Ask_kbincafe
  • SuperSentai
  • feritale
  • KamenRider
  • All magazines