'Empty shelves with absolutely no books': Students, parents question school board's library weeding process

Several Peel District School Board students, parents and community members are concerned about a seemingly inconsistent approach to a new book weeding process intended to ensure school library books are inclusive, but that appears to have led some schools to remove thousands of books published in 2008 or earlier.

Nightwind,

As a German: “First time?”

They will not stop at removing books, you know…

PenguinTD,

It they are digitized or have digitized version that students can just download for free then I don’t really mind they recycle them. Heck, even held a auction for old books about to be removed and let the book lovers get them cheap.(then recycle the rest.)

eltimablo,

The digitized version won't be sitting on a shelf catching the eye of curious students though. Discoverability suffers significantly.

Fedizen,

not to mention digital books are more accessible to kids who don’t need them: kids who have easy access to lots of connected digital devices.

jadero,

Absolutely!

This is my big hate for online stores in general, but books especially. I find browsablility far superior to searchability. Being searchable obviously has its place, as do recommendation systems, but nothing beats just looking around and discovering what you didn’t even know existed.

MisterD,

sounds a lot like Fahrenheit 451.

Canadian_anarchist,
@Canadian_anarchist@lemmy.ca avatar

Unfortunately they won’t be able to read it because it was published before 2008.

Blamemeta,

It sounds more like they’re removing books well before they need to in the name of them being old, but not replacing them.

15 years is not that long for a book, although in a school library that might be different.

snooggums,
@snooggums@kbin.social avatar

In a school library there shoukd be a mix of older and newer books so that students are exposed to a wide variety of content, writing styles, etc.

adespoton,

In this context, “older” refers to the age of the physical book, not the date it was first published.

sik0fewl,

The subtitle of the article is "Books published in 2008 or earlier removed from school library amid confusion around new equity-based process".

snooggums,
@snooggums@kbin.social avatar

No, in this context it is not the physical age of the books themselves as the whole thing is about promoting being inclusive by assuming any book older than 15 years is less inclusive.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • uselessserver093
  • Food
  • aaaaaaacccccccce
  • [email protected]
  • test
  • CafeMeta
  • testmag
  • MUD
  • RhythmGameZone
  • RSS
  • dabs
  • Socialism
  • TheResearchGuardian
  • Ask_kbincafe
  • KbinCafe
  • oklahoma
  • feritale
  • SuperSentai
  • KamenRider
  • All magazines