Likely an unpopular opinion, but if Hamas releases the hostages and surrenders it’s leadership, it is more likely to result in cessation of military action for some time, than if Israel stops bombing.
The current calls to stop bombing is akin to telling the US to stop bombing cities in Germany during world war two.
Israel is looking to exploit and oppress, but don’t forget that Hamas will not stop until all Jews and non Muslims are exterminated.
Simply not true, in 2018 iirc there were about 1500 Palestinian deaths and 0 israeli deaths. Israelis are not the victims. They constantly bully Palestinians out of their homes under military protection. Currently the civilians of gaza are under siege and even if they wanted to leave they cannot, they have nowhere to go.
True. Hamas also offered to release the prisoners in exchange for all Palestinian prisoners in Israeli prisons. Israel continues to refuse the swap and as a result some have died in the bombings.
You are lying but I will limit myself to addressing your final lie which you base your other lies on. After all it is Israel and not Hamas that bombed the Church in Gaza.
From Hamas Charter:
Hamas affirms that its conflict is with the Zionist project not with the Jews because of their religion. Hamas does not wage a struggle against the Jews because they are Jewish but wages a struggle against the Zionists who occupy Palestine. Yet, it is the Zionists who constantly identify Judaism and the Jews with their own colonial project and illegal entity.
Hamas rejects the persecution of any human being or the undermining of his or her rights on nationalist, religious or sectarian grounds. Hamas is of the view that the Jewish problem, anti-Semitism and the persecution of the Jews are phenomena fundamentally linked to European history and not to the history of the Arabs and the Muslims or to their heritage. The Zionist movement, which was able with the help of Western powers to occupy Palestine, is the most dangerous form of settlement occupation which has already disappeared from much of the world and must disappear from Palestine.
Well, 16 works in both ways. As Hamas will be quick to point out that any jew “between the river and the sea” is there illegally as an opressor and thus a zionist, and thus a valid target.
This is substantiated by what the world has been demonstrated in terms of attacks in Israel proper.
« En ne condamnant pas le Hamas, la Russie couvre un groupe terroriste qui brutalise des civils innocents. C’est scandaleux. C’est hypocrite et indéfendable », a déclaré l’Ambassadrice américaine auprès des Nations Unies, Linda Thomas-Greenfield.
Le vote sur un texte rival présenté par le Brésil a été reporté à mardi pour donner plus de temps pour négocier. Le projet de texte condamne « les odieuses attaques terroristes du Hamas ».
Oui, c’est dégueulasse. On préfère continuer le génocide plutôt que voter un cesser le feu parce qu’on aimerait bien voir le Hamas mentionné dans le texte.
Je suis curieux de voir quelle excuse ils vont nous trouver pour rejeter le texte du Brésil.
Intéressant tiens, après j’ai l’impression que vu la population de !france ce seront surtout les utilisateurs sur lemmy.world et slrpunk.net qui seront impactés
Je ne comprends pas pourquoi on ne peut pas avoir un peu de patience pendant quelques heures pour publier une meilleure décision. Probablement, Israël ne renvoie pas tous ses soldats à la maison immédiatement juste parce que l’ONU exprime également son désaccord par écrit. Sur Lemmygrad, il semble que les utilisateurs aient un problème à se distancier du Hamas.
Je t’ai downvoté parce que tu n’as fait que copier coller une partie de l’article, sans y ajouter ni commentaire, ni contexte.
Ce contenu est deja visible par tout le monde dans la publication donc le commentaire n’apporte rien à la discussion, c’est bien dans ces cas là que la fonction de downvote se justifie.
Oui j’ai hesité à le mettre dans sur /c/monde, mais j’ai decidé de le mettre finalement ici puisque la France a participé au vote. Tu prefererais reserver cette commu à l’actualité spécifique à la France alors ?
What you posted is in context…? I don’t understand what you mean. I mean out of context as in the absence of politics and nations… The world’s alone… With no context.
Wait I was under the impression that some time ago they lifted the embargo as US-Cuba relations have improved a bit. A man would think raising an embargo would improve relations even more /sigh
Sauf les Emirats qui sont ami des US et de la Chine. Eux l’ont probablement voté parce que voter contre un cessez le feu serait mal vu par leur population qui est sensible à la cause palestinienne bien que le pays soit politiquement enemi du Hamas.
It makes sense - a country with plenty of space and natural resources, a mild climate (relatively, looking forwards), innovative engineering skills, new potential from connections to europe, should be encouraging immigration, but 4.5m implies a lot more than just return of refugees, and east europe had westwards emigration in recent decades, so from where are these new arrivals going to come - turkey, africa, south asia ? Archaeologists suggest that ancestors of many eurasians spread out from the pontic steppe - time to come back ?
The first step would maybe open the doors to the migrants that cross the Mediterranean, whichnas you mention, are Turkish and North African primarily (I believe one of the larger countries involved was Libya?)
news.un.org
Top