zephyreks

@[email protected]

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

An African Student’s Murder Sheds Light on Russia’s Race Problem (www.themoscowtimes.com)

On the eve of the BRICS summit in South Africa last month, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov slammed the “colonial and racist manners” of “Western elites,” who exploit resource-rich countries to pursue goals that “do not reflect the aspirations of all mankind.” Russia, in contrast, stands for “strengthening”...

zephyreks,

These issues aren’t exactly contradicting each other, though. You can be anti-immigration but still want other economies to grow and develop and be supported.

Switzerland in no rush to mirror EU sanctions against China (www.swissinfo.ch)

Switzerland feared retaliatory measures from China but kept the decision quiet for undefined legal reasons, reports the NZZ am Sonntag newspaper. China’s ambassador to Bern, Wang Shihting, warned Switzerland last November not to impose sanctions. “Anyone who really cares about the friendly relations between the two countries...

zephyreks,

Switzerland not afraid of cheap EVs and cheap solar.

Scandinavia criticizes China for Tibet situation, EU Policy Director Vincent Metten called on UN member states to vote against China’s full membership in the Human Rights Council in October (web.archive.org)

Metten also stressed the critical need for nations to hold China accountable for its ‘severe human rights violations’ during its fourth Universal Periodic Review, done by the UN Human Rights Council in January. Such as what’s happening in Tibet....

zephyreks,

Didn’t literally all the Muslim countries visit Xinjiang and come out of it with the consensus of “yeah, y’know what, China’s doing pretty good all things considered.”

What makes the opinions of white non-Muslim people matter in this context?

zephyreks,

Why would Ford care when it can just petition the US government to block the sale of Chinese cars? It’s the same thing Boeing did to block Bombardier sales in the US.

zephyreks,

Are these subsidies or tax breaks? I can never be sure tbh

zephyreks,

Tax breaks remove potential future tax revenue, but aren’t spending tax revenue acquired from another source.

zephyreks,

But with a tax break in an emerging business, that revenue wouldn’t otherwise exist because the company wouldn’t have opened operations here when it could take advantage of egregious US subsidies instead.

zephyreks,

Economic growth doesn’t happen on its own. The Canadian economy isn’t some entity that magically sees growth without investment.

zephyreks,

Yawn. Watch as the US still avoids taking a strong position on the issue because India is too important for American geopolitical goals in Asia and Canada is no longer at risk of aligning with the Soviet Union.

We’re no longer relevant to US interests.

zephyreks,

Tell me what the US has done to sanction India for their assassination of a Canadian citizen on Canadian soil, then.

Oh, right.

Jack fucking shit.

zephyreks,

Weren’t there millions of Ukrainians who fought for the Red Army? Meanwhile, literal Nazis were committing literal genocide and literally had plans to enslave/kill/eradicate Slavs because they were seen as less human.

zephyreks,

No way, you mean the Red Army wasn’t too happy fighting a country that literally thought Slavs were subhuman and that the only reason Slavs shouldn’t all be dead is because they weren’t done doing that to the Jews?

You must be joking…

zephyreks,

We aren’t making this politically important enough for the NDP to justify burning ties with the forestry industry.

zephyreks,

The US doesn’t give a shit about labour. That’s why they legislated ATCs out of a strike and that’s why they legislated rail workers out of a strike.

zephyreks,

I’m absolutely sure this hacker group definitely 100% wasn’t funded by the Modi government whatsoever mhmm uh huh for sure

zephyreks,

How has the union not been able to make a case that this isn’t meeting the terms listed in the contract?

zephyreks,

It absolutely is, even if your particular instance hasn’t been. Lemmy.world probably takes the brunt of it.

zephyreks,

With all these supply chains coming onshore, where’s the Chinese EVs? Whereas Chinese companies have been able to produce $10000 EVs, other car companies struggle to produce cars at twice the cost. EVs aren’t affordable in Canada without subsidies, but affordability is the single biggest driver behind purchasing decisions as we transition from fossil fuels to electricity.

zephyreks,

The $10000 BYD Seagull has a respectable top speed and is definitely a car, but hasn’t tried to get certified in Canada, that is true. However, other BYD cars (the Dolphin, for example) have met accreditation standards in North America, Australia, and Europe.

zephyreks,

[citation needed]

zephyreks,

Where’s the indication that they sell at cost? Seems to me like they’re just able to drive costs down because of integrated supply chains.

zephyreks,

The Dolphin was a 15k vehicle inside China lol.

zephyreks,

I’m sure that the Indian Cyber Force wasn’t funded by the Indian government. Of course. Absolutely.

zephyreks,

That changed at the end of the war in 1944/1945 when you could be conscripted into the SS, but that fact is completely irrelevant in this context because the 1st Galician was entirely made up of volunteers.

Fucking Nazi apologists, man.

zephyreks,

How can we have so many immigrants yet still lack personnel in essential sectors like healthcare, education, engineering, and technology?

The question shouldn’t be whether we are allowing people to immigrate, but what occupations those people are intended to cover for. As it stands, it seems like we are simply importing labour and socializing the cost of a massive population increase. It’s not benefiting the Canadian economy by increasing average worker productivity (by allowing high-skill workers to immigrate), it’s not helping to cover gaps in our social systems (by allowing healthcare/education workers to immigrate), and often times it’s not even benefiting the immigrants themselves (as can be seen by the many “college scams” out there).

Our points-based system needs a revamp to help fill in the loopholes people are using. Since demand for immigration to Canada is so high, we can afford to be more selective in who we take.

The key changes I would make are:

  1. Constructing a whitelist of permitted Canadian post-secondary institutions (limited primarily to publicly-funded universities that form the core of the Canadian post-secondary system)
  2. Giving additional points for those coming from well-regarded international schools (think IIT Bombay, Tsinghua, Technion, Sharif University of Technology, Seoul National University, National University of Singapore) to a similar degree as from a Canadian institution
  3. Accreditation of what is considered “skilled work” under the Canadian skilled work experience clause
  4. Expansion of the H1B visa transfer program

I would couple this with significantly expanded funding/tax breaks into the startup environment for Canada to create more employment opportunities for skilled workers.

Canada is clearly an extremely desirable place to live (moreso than the US in many ways), so why not use that advantage to attract the best and brightest from around the world and use them to develop burgeoning domestic industries?

zephyreks,

Immigrating to America is a pain in the ass.

zephyreks,

Go to “post-secondary” at a “Canadian institution”

Follow that up with “employment” at a “skilled work company”

Bim bam boom magical PR

Russia, China, Iran state media see boost on X after removal of ‘state-affiliated’ labels (thehill.com)

The accounts of several Russian, Chinese and Iranian state media outlets saw a 70 percent increase in engagement on X, the platform formerly known as Twitter, after it removed labels identifying them as “state-affiliated,” according to a new report released Tuesday....

zephyreks,

Musk wasn’t wrong in applying the state media tag to NPR/BBC/CBC. At the end of the day, they are funded by the state.

zephyreks,

State funding describes a conflict of interest, whether perceived or actual.

zephyreks,

Does that claim remove the existence of conflict of interest?

zephyreks,

Tell me you haven’t read the Communist Manifesto without telling me you haven’t read the Communist Manifesto.

zephyreks,

The entire point of E2EE is that it doesn’t matter who the host is.

zephyreks,

Dude’s SS. Nazi apologism doesn’t really work when the SS was directly and willingly involved in many war crimes.

zephyreks,

Not found to be guilty of war crimes, but with many accusations and with a record of murdering civilians.

Wonderful.

zephyreks,

Then why have a peace blueprint in the first place? By your description, Ukraine has no reason whatsoever to ask for peace. Why propose a peace blueprint?

zephyreks,

By definition, that is pro-vigilantism

Reflecting on Canada's F-35 decision: F-35 fighter jets can only fly 55% of the time (www.ft.com)

The fleet’s mission-capable rate — or the percentage of time a plane can perform one of its assigned missions — was 55 per cent as of March 2023, far below the Pentagon’s goal of 85 per cent to 90 per cent, the Government Accountability Office said on Thursday....

zephyreks,

The Gripen was an option better suited for protecting Canada, while the F-35 was a better option for if we wanted to project power abroad in support of the US.

Canada has its priorities all out of whack.

zephyreks,

Our other options included no such terms, and, frankly, the F-35’s stealth capability is much more important in offensive theatres than defensive ones where multiple overlapping radar frequencies are both feasible and already exist and active countermeasures can be freely used without fear of detection.

Canada’s military is defensive in nature and it’s primarily focused on patrolling the Arctic. For that purpose, the F-35’s range and payload make it rather… unideal.

zephyreks,

Why would we want an offensive force? We have enough land as it is and our primary focus should be on soft power (so people don’t want to invade us) and defence (so people who try end up bleeding so much it doesn’t matter). Canada is uniquely suited for defence in depth given that our key geographical rival (Russia) would have to invade from the North, literally the furthest they could possibly be from key population centers, and that on the off chance that China decides to invade us, they’d have to cross through the Rockies AND the Prairies just to make it even close to the Golden Horseshoe. In fact, I’d actually argue that our key rival in terms of defence should actually be the US: their instability makes it increasingly likely that we may get caught up in a sort of hostile occupation if war should break out and they have the capability to easily strike all main Canadian population centers.

zephyreks,

That would still be an improvement, though. I think it’s perfectly fair that US defence contractors get paid for their development, and I’d even accept paying them on a per-repair basis, I just don’t think that Canada’s defence capability should be entirely dependent on when a US company decides to send their repair team.

zephyreks,

I completely agree, particularly given Canada’s defensive environment. Canada has a whole fuck ton of terrain to play with in the event of an invasion, so why not develop the capability for working in that terrain?

zephyreks,

The war in Ukraine has shown that NATO doctrine is, frankly, not very good against something even close to a peer force.

zephyreks,

Have you been following Ukraine’s counteroffensive at all? Despite NATO training and being showered by NATO equipment, Ukraine is incapable of making progress in offensive operations. It’s been four months and they’ve just barely claimed a 10km x 10km area of low ground.

zephyreks,

Ukrainian soldiers on the front lines have been complaining that NATO doctrine, which relies on complete local superiority, is basically sending them to die when used against a peer force.

NATO doctrine has evolved into one that is really good at fighting insurgents and completely inferior militaries (e.g. Iraq) but has never been good in a peer war. Even historically, this is evident by the Korean War, the Vietnam War, and the War in Afghanistan.

zephyreks,

China is moving faster on renewables than every other country. China is moving faster on EVs than every other country.

Who’s not changing?

zephyreks,

If you feel like giving China a domestic supply of O&G so they can switch their coal plants to gas ones, be my guest.

That’s been the single greatest contributor to reduced emissions in North America and Europe over the past few decades.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • uselessserver093
  • Food
  • aaaaaaacccccccce
  • test
  • CafeMeta
  • testmag
  • MUD
  • RhythmGameZone
  • RSS
  • dabs
  • KamenRider
  • TheResearchGuardian
  • KbinCafe
  • Socialism
  • oklahoma
  • SuperSentai
  • feritale
  • All magazines