synceDD

synceDD, 10 months ago

But pc is acceptable??? Hahaha so self righteous getting second hand cringe here

synceDD, 10 months ago

Whats wrong with windows 11

synceDD, 10 months ago

Evil - least sheltered redditor, just an ass

synceDD, 10 months ago

K hes hitler the evil twins

synceDD, 10 months ago

Ad hominems, buddy projecting find an argument next time

synceDD, 10 months ago

So what we call hitler then

synceDD, 10 months ago

Deep, so both linus and Hitler are evil ?

synceDD, 10 months ago (edited 10 months ago)

So?

Edit wait are you claiming redditor is an ad hominem? Do you think that migrating to lemmy from reddit for a month puts you so much higher above redditors that u perceive being called one as an attack directed against you??? LMFAOOOOOO

synceDD, 10 months ago

So if linus did an evil deed, how we calling hitlers deeds then

synceDD, 10 months ago

Tfw even u know how ridiculous it is to use the same adjective for linus and hitler so u have to resort to metaphors and ad hominems to avoid answering and hide your embarrassment, only ghosting me is left >.< farewell

synceDD, 10 months ago

Still at deflection stage alright ghosting’s postponed for now

synceDD, 10 months ago

Leaker uses twitter so article bad?

synceDD, 10 months ago

But it isnt so whats the problem ?

synceDD, 10 months ago

Yeah they just need bandwidth for a billion people no biggie, thank you for your expertise

synceDD, 10 months ago

Ironic, thats u trying to leech off youtube for free

synceDD, 10 months ago

So I’m sure u wont have a problem avoiding it therefore this doesnt concern you

synceDD, 10 months ago

Why would they?

synceDD, 10 months ago

Other browsers already do, firefox users just cant stop licking mozillas balls

synceDD, 10 months ago

The point is they already do unlike what the article claims

synceDD, 10 months ago (edited 10 months ago)

Idk what u mean but whatever ad scenario u have going on in your brain, i said extensions supported, which means adblocks included

synceDD, 10 months ago

I think youre the one confused other mobile browsers already support extensions, too bad 100 people downvoting lack the skill to google

synceDD, 10 months ago

They only mention “open extension ecosystem” idk if that means everything and also I haven’t found an extension not working on mine yet I have even installed a flash player extension for flash games on my browser so no opinion on those statements

synceDD, 10 months ago

What u highlight desktop for, the article is about android and the 10 extensions it has so far, your own highlight says “about upcoming android release” desktop is only mentioned for devs to optimize their shit for mobile use.

And no my extensions were not from mozilla thats my whole point I can get extensions elsewhere this whole time, which is why I mock mobile mozilla users in the comments thinking mozilla did something revolutionary.

synceDD, 10 months ago

Complaining about your own customized feed. Amazing

synceDD, 10 months ago

Yes the phone half america buys is not tech bro expected semiconductor analysis customize your feed better then

synceDD, 10 months ago

Im european but the site is american and what half america buys is tech news, scream to the void instead of fixing your feed

synceDD, 10 months ago

Being offered a second option and not having a monopoly is as consumer friendly as it gets, may I suggest a dictionary?

synceDD, 10 months ago

Using your own product to advertise others? How dare they. Are you also angry theyre using windows to advertise onedrive? Lmao

synceDD, 10 months ago

Nice strawman bro

synceDD, 10 months ago

If u see an alphabet letter and first thing u imagine is elon u may need to take a break from twitter a bit

synceDD, 10 months ago

No third party repairs = not owning? May I suggest a dictionary

synceDD, 10 months ago

i would love for you to define a version of ownership where you being unable to find someone to pay to repair your shit means you do not own it

synceDD, 10 months ago

From your link

European Convention on Human Rights

acknowledges a right for a natural or legal person to "peaceful enjoyment of his possessions

Universal Declaration of Human Rights

1. Everyone has the right to own property alone as well as in association with others.

2. No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his property.

No repair mention anywhere so idk what youre on about, also by your logic you dont own your 1950 fridge anymore because theres no one left to repair it, your argument is so stupid

synceDD, 10 months ago (edited 10 months ago)

Does someone forbid you from repairing it? I am not sure if you’re arguing in bad faith or if this is just a mistake to be honest.>>>

No answer, evil government took him out after taking away his repair rights >.< (which rights arent even mentioned anywhere so idk what the fuck u feel entitled to that is allegedly being taken away here)

synceDD, 10 months ago

That message wasnt a reply to any comment of yours? I even copied a part of his reply to mine

synceDD, 10 months ago

peaceful enjoyment of his possessions

That obviously means government recognizing you have the right to own it and not arbitrarily depriving you of your property, maybe the other declaration below should have given you a clue 🤠. Now if u wanna claim the “peace” is referring to your mental state, then I can also claim I’m not at peace if my stuff cant give me a blowjob. Be reasonable and stop grasping at straws.

So if it breaks, and i can’t repair it, then I lose this property.

No, if your property breaks you still own property, broken property. The company is only responsible for a certain lifespan, it is called guarantee, dont like it, dont buy it.

if a company prevents you from repairing your equipment

They dont you are allowed to do whatever you want to it

that company is either unwilling

Theyre only responsible for guarantee

do you consider the failure of the property to be an act of god which the vendor is in no way responsible for

He is responsible for guarantee

synceDD, 10 months ago

✌️

synceDD, 10 months ago

Dont know which comments belong to your inbox but you instantly found block button what a quick learner, now you only have to achieve your government-backed peaceful state of mind 🤠

synceDD, 10 months ago

He’s talking about the right to repair you’re own stuff or have someone look at it.

Your argument was this, not anti-consumer, so even though none of his sources mentioned a right to repair by government, only a right to own, a private entity making their parts hard to swap would not necessarily infringe on that repair right, as far as we are concerned it could only cover being allowed to attempt whatever repairs you want. Now, if you manage to find a source about that right to repair that ALSO mentions easy repairs by third parties, we can argue further

synceDD, 10 months ago

so how do you enjoy your possessions peacefully if they break? is repairing them…not peaceful?

Lmao he said that according to government he should be able to not only own but also enjoy his property peacefully so yeah literally a government sponsored peaceful state of mind.

synceDD, 10 months ago

One guy interprets enjoying property peacefully as in repair rights, you interpret it as dont hit your neighbour with it and I’m the one trolling, amazing. Enjoying peacefully means you have the recognized right to own shit. Here is an example of violating that right and stealing someone’s shit in wikipedia right under the property article

In the case of Mifsud and others v Malta (38770/17) the Maltese state was found to have violated Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the convention. The case involved a plot of land owned by the Mifsud family and their heirs which was expropriated twice (in 1984 and in 2012)

Expropriate definition: (especially of the state) take away (property) from its owner.

synceDD, 10 months ago (edited 10 months ago)

It is not a law in most places yet and yet you defended the other guy when you said he was claiming apple is violating his repair rights and that I was arguing in bad faith??

synceDD, 10 months ago

You dont care about law after debating its definition for 10 comments and defending others mentioning it nice

synceDD, 10 months ago (edited 10 months ago)

Companies dont want pirated content and its consequences on their products? Im sure you would love dealing with those headaches for free if you were responsible for them

Downvotes from children living in their fantasy world where articles about running pirated windows is a good look for apple

synceDD, 10 months ago

Not illegal = apple wants windows on their products? Bless your heart

synceDD, 10 months ago

which requires intel processor, which they got rid of with their m line so obviously they dont like that stuff

synceDD, 10 months ago

Yes thats how copyright works thats why u can freely download nintendo roms too, its ok apple bad

synceDD, 10 months ago

Beta software when even official releases have bugs? Nope, couldn’t be me, nosireee

If I like steak I want to eat a good one, try again