@emma@programming.dev avatar

emma

@[email protected]

📎 links:

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

emma,
@emma@programming.dev avatar

the wide toebox gang unites against the forces of the shoe industry in order to dismantle the unspoken culture of foot binding in our society - colorized 2023

emma,
@emma@programming.dev avatar

I believe there is a setting to disable seeing posts from accounts labelled as a “bot account”. (I realize that this would technically also hide all other bots, not just reddit repost ones, but I personally don’t really know of any content posted by a bot that I want to see).

https://programming.dev/pictrs/image/568e36c0-99c4-433b-8dbd-2f5d32e055ee.jpeg

emma,
@emma@programming.dev avatar

I don’t get it. Is the joke that i18n for CLIs is unimportant? Or is this an earnest post that just so happened to get posted under humor? I wish I had the source for the image.

I've lately been making my git commit messages with AI (reddthat.com)

It writes more informative commits than I could ever make so I’m just reading what it says and mostly copy/pasting completely most of the time, I write all of the changes I’ve made into an LLM with a large context window and it write a very detailed commit not just with a title but with bullet points describing each of the...

emma,
@emma@programming.dev avatar

IMHO, the provided link is largely irrelevant to this topic. It is about lawyers who used ChatGPT as a search engine youtu.be/oqSYljRYDEM?t=1436, which is not what it is for, and it will tell you that over and over again. The lawyers in question were not even “trusting ChatGPT”. They blatantly and actively disregarded ChatGPT telling them that it was not a search engine and could not provide legal advice youtu.be/oqSYljRYDEM?t=1466

This topic is about using LLMs to generate natural language describing code changes that it is provided with which is not only completely different than using an LLM as a defacto search engine, but it is also something LLMs are actually meant to do: autocomplete. This topic is more akin to using LLMs to write title headings for legal documents which are already basically complete as is than it is akin to the link provided.

emma,
@emma@programming.dev avatar

Okay, so to be honest, at first, I didn’t understand all the ❌negativity, but I shared this with a friend to get her take on the issue, and she 🕵️‍♀️clued me into the fact that webpack already does this with copilot and pull requests, and the results . . . speak for themselves.

Wow😅. I didn’t think it would be that bad. It seems that every example I find is just incorrect. I’ll look at the code. It will be a two line change, but the summary will be difficult to follow and often says things that are not part of the code changes. Then, there are also contradictions which make the pull requests harder to follow than if you just read the code with no other context. Darn it. I really thought this was a 🧊cool idea.

I’m definitely going to be sticking to writing my own commits as always.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • random
  • uselessserver093
  • Food
  • aaaaaaacccccccce
  • test
  • CafeMeta
  • testmag
  • MUD
  • RhythmGameZone
  • RSS
  • dabs
  • KamenRider
  • TheResearchGuardian
  • KbinCafe
  • Socialism
  • oklahoma
  • SuperSentai
  • feritale
  • All magazines
    •