I would like to help an open-source project with UI design and UX design. I have over 18 years of experience in the field and have worked with desktop and mobile software on Windows, Mac, iOS, Android and Windows Mobile/Windows Phone. Unfortunately my knowledge of Linux is very limited but I'm eager to learn. Could you help me find a project? @thelinuxEXP@linux@macrumors@windowscentral@windows
The programming language Go has only few UI building options. One of the few that does not rely on a browser running underneath is fyne. I like its programming model a lot, but as you likely see in the example screenshots: something is off. I can’t put my finger on it. I assume it’s a mix of different subtle visual cues, spacing, etc.
So if you are willing to work on a UI framework (with bonus points if you are interested in doing a bit of Go programming), I think contributions to fyne would be very cool (so far the maintainer(s) were open to suggestions and input, so I also assume designer input is welcome :-)).
Hi, we're a tech startup run by libertarian Silicon Valley tech bros.
We're not a newspaper, we're a content portal.
We're not a taxi service, we're a ride sharing app.
We're not a pay TV service, we're a streaming platform.
We're not a department store, we're an e-commerce marketplace.
We're not a financial services firm, we're crypto.
We're not a space agency, we're a group of visionaries who are totally going to Mars next year.
We're not a copywriting and graphic design agency, we're a large language model generative AI platform.
Oh sure, we compete against those established businesses. We basically provide the same goods and services.
But we're totally not those things. At least from a legal and PR standpoint.
And that means all the laws and regulations that have built up over the decades around those industries don't apply to us.
Things like consumer protections, privacy protections, minimum wage laws, local content requirements, safety regulations, environmental protections... They totally don't apply to us.
Even copyright laws — as long as we're talking about everyone else's intellectual property.
We're going to move fast and break things — and then externalise the costs of the things we break.
We've also raised several billion in VC funding, and we'll sell our products below cost — even give them away for free for a time — until we run our competition out of the market.
Once we have a near monopoly, we'll enshitify the hell out of our service and jack up prices.
You won't believe what you agreed to in our terms of service agreement.
We may also be secretly hoarding your personal information. We know who you are, we know where you work, we know where you live. But you can trust us.
By the time the regulators and the general public catch on to what we're doing, we will have well and truly moved on to our next grift.
By the way, don't forget to check out our latest innovation. It's the Uber of toothpaste!
Wenn für dich “jegliche Erziehung” = “Verbote” ist, dann vermutlich schon. Für mich bedeutet Erziehung aber, am Ende selbstbestimmte Menschen zu haben, die Risiken abwägen und mit Konsequenzen umgehen können. Wenn die Risikoabwägung nur darin besteht zu entscheiden, was man seinen Eltern erzählen kann und was nicht, um möglichst wenige negative Konsequenzen zu haben, dann ist das für’s Leben irgendwie der falsche Anreiz.
Ja das trifft es glaube ich ganz gut. Letztlich ist es doch besser, ein Kind lernt (z.B.), was an Facebook problematisch ist und wie man damit umgeht, als dass man einfach nur sagt “NEIN, FINGER WEG” und es dann im Geheimen völlig unkontrolliert und ohne sinnvolle Hinweise damit konfrontiert wird. Oder dann halt mit der nächsten, ähnlichen Plattform.
Aber “über die Schulter schauen” ist doch gerade nicht verbieten?
Und wieso sollte ich meinem Kind Eiscreme vorm Abendessen verbieten? Ich erkläre dann, dass es davon Bauchschmerzen kriegt und es ihm übel geht. Vielleicht noch mit einem Vergleich “weißt du noch, als du … willst du sowas wieder?”. Wenn es insistiert … na dann bitte. Lernen durch (harmlosen) “Schmerz”. Oder wenn man was anderes zur Hand hat, von dem man weiß, dass das Kind es will, kann man ja auch verhandeln … “Du kannst nur Eiscreme oder … haben. Willst du das andere nicht auch? Wenn du jetzt die Eiscreme nimmst, kriegst du … aber nicht.”