I've posted this link before, but for someone else, I think.
I'm a heavy outliner - I include all/most of the little side conversations and bits and bobs in my outlines, because I find that with that complete an outline, I can get up to 5-8000 words in a writing day. (The link is ugly, I'm so sorry.)
I know a lot of pantsers and plantsers, but I'm not one of them.
Hey, @romancelandia
via long time romance reader Marilyn:"I don't read a lot of contemporaries, but this is a really good romance. Different. And the protagonists are actual grownups."
Emma Barry's Chick Magnet is on sale at just under two dollars, for the rest of November.
@romancelandia
Found via @tuphlos on twitter, this piece has some blood pressure-raising bits; the most important is the assumption that changing the covers of genre romances of different heat levels/sexual content, changes the actual content.
"oh, these books that are no longer coded erotic romance are actually good stories/writing/characters, but I couldn't have known unless they had acceptable covers" is a thing said there.
Also, they're clearly cherry-picking the more modern covers. The number of covers shown goes way down and they're sticking to a very few, specific, sub-genres.
Is anyone else having issues with jetpack showing their stats correctly on a free #Wordpress blog?
In days when I have a bit more traffic, the main page will give me a number, but when I click on the traffic tab, the listed blog posts and views do not match that number, they're significantly fewer.
Yeah, tell me about it (the low pay). I'm a KU author and I'm just... I don't want to go wide, because just the thought of having to do all the marketing etc myself is wrenching, but KU's just... not paying.
(Admittedly, I do need to poke my ads, but... :whine:)
Initially, I thought you meant that Austen had written a here-to-fore unknown alternate ending and I was shocked, but no, this is about the 2005 movie. Phew.