principalkohoutek,

Idk anything about this fella, but that snow white hair and beard look fuckin fresh

PP_BOY_,
@PP_BOY_@lemmy.world avatar

As an American, I agree.

MDZA,

As a Brit, I agree too. Europe is incapable of defending an allied nation within our own continent from invasion. We need to do better.

The military capability of European nations have to improve so we can guarantee our own security and be a more equal partner in NATO rather than a junior partner to the US.

wintermute_oregon,

You run into the weird issue, what if America can’t or won’t help.

Right now everyone depends on America to defend them but we may not always be able too.

nogooduser,

I don’t think that we are incapable of doing that. What we have done is a balancing act of assisting Ukraine against Russia without going to war with Russia.

If we were to have sent in troops from the start then it would be a completely different picture. I’m not sure that it would be a better picture though.

MDZA,

It may have been different if there were boots on the ground, sure. But I think their willingness to invade would have been severely diminished if they thought Europe could easily defend Ukraine without the assistance of the US.

bouh,

I agree. But there’s so much to do for a EU defense… GB is aligned with the US. Germany and a few other countries are entirely trusting the US. Hungary would probably side with Russia at this point.

I wish the war kick-started eu defense better.

DahGangalang,

As an American, I’ve mixed feelings.

On the one hand, I think I think Europe owning it’s own defense would be a solid move to ensure it’s own sovereignty and independence as a modern nation…thing.

On the other hand, I fear this could lead to US - EU military rivalry. While not necessarily the strongest bond in the world, I do value the relatively positive relationship the US and EU have. I hope that bond is preserved and hope we can grow even closer over time.

jecxjo,
@jecxjo@midwest.social avatar

I think the fact the EU steuggles as much as it does in the near future they would be at best a weaker China. Lots of bodies but sub par military capabilities. The benefit we get in the US is that we’d only need to come in as support and military guidance rather than sending a lot of troops. They will still suck at doing things as it will be military by committee so in cases with countries like Russia they will most likely defer to the US to just run things.

MiddleKnight,

nation……thing

we prefer the term “sui generis geopolitical entity” ;)

DahGangalang,

Political entity. I’m surprised how much I like that label. Thanks for informing me :)

c0mbatbag3l,
@c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world avatar

Yeah, if we stopped being the world’s police we might have tax money for something else.

AngryCommieKender,

Taxes don’t pay for anything at the federal level. They are deleted. We used to literally burn them back when we collected physical money. We can afford both our current military spending, and every single progressive policy that AOC or Bernie can dream up just fine. (Not saying we should, just that we can. I think we should scale back on certain aspects of the military, but that’s a whole other discussion) The government just “prints” more money and deposits it in the appropriate accounts via the Federal Reserve. Taxes are merely an anti-inflationary device to ensure that inflation stays stable. Running deficits doesn’t cause inflation. If it did, Japan would have been thoroughly fucked in the last 30 years of running the highest deficit by percentage of any country in the world. In reality they are running the largest deficit economy, and barely fighting off deflation.

Edit: this only applies to a sovereign fiat currency.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • uselessserver093
  • Food
  • [email protected]
  • aaaaaaacccccccce
  • test
  • CafeMeta
  • testmag
  • MUD
  • RhythmGameZone
  • RSS
  • dabs
  • oklahoma
  • Socialism
  • KbinCafe
  • TheResearchGuardian
  • SuperSentai
  • feritale
  • KamenRider
  • All magazines