100% non credible take
![](https://kbin.cafe/media/cache/resolve/entry_thumb/99/73/9973c8bac3b06202fca7f0413861644d3b0b19b216f42557ca592dd5f0d934e7.png)
MataVatnik, This blew my mind
DragonTypeWyvern, I mean, it’s already an open secret that everyone with a space program has some weaponized “civilian” satellites…
OttoVonNoob, Ootl: I cant find anything on the internet. We’re the star link satellites originally the projectile attack satellites?
einfach_orangensaft, Ok let me stay non credible here:
- SpaceX gets funding from the DoD to make resuable rockets happen
- Starship is just the modern version of this
- DoD funds Starlink because is has huge military applications
Geting even more non credible now, starlinks potential features:
- Low latency, jam resistant global drone control.
- Signal intelligence gathering and source triangulation (Wirelessdevices, Radar, Motor ignitions)
- Distributed Aperture Radar scanning for high resulution, quick update visual intel in all weather conditions.
- Distributed directional signal jamming
- ICBM interception thru kinetic impact
- ICBM interception thru distributed direct energy means
- cicumventing local internet censorship for psyop means
- securing those orbits before china can put satelites there
- blocking the view of higher flying enemy spy sats
Thx for coming to my non credible ted talk.
Add comment