Foldable smartphones have reached their fifth major generation, as heralded by Samsung’s Galaxy Z Flip 5 and Fold 5...
For me it's definitely the durability concerns. I've valued my phone's water and dust resistance since getting an ip67 phone years and years ago. My brother had a flip and a grain of sand in his pocket got under the display; when he closed the phone the display died. And they expect me to pay more for the privilege.
IMO, I think it’s a pretty dumb concept in the way we’re currently implementing it. If I want a borderline TV to carry around, I’ll buy a tablet. I just want a phone for quick access to my communications mainly; I don’t have vision issues that requires the screen to even be as big as some of the “small” offerings from the larger players in the cellular phone market. Additionally, to satisfy the quick access, many have multiple screens now, which I think is equally dumb, you’re never going to use both screens at the same time, and most of the time there’s no use-case where both screens would be on. The only viable folding device IMO, is the zFlip, and my pockets aren’t small enough for me to care, or justify the extra cost, and durability concerns.
I recognize it’s an important step in the process to make phones like this to further the foldable screens, so they can be further developed to be more durable, more flexible, and overall better than they currently are, but I, personally, have no need for one, nor desire to own one. The crease isn’t pretty either, but it’s not my chief concern… it’s just way too much for way too little. I haven’t appreciated the direction of phones for a while, or the emphasis on the camera; simply, I want something better, faster, easier to use, and that lasts longer. Not a phablet with less than 18 hours of battery life, and a last-gen mobile radio in it… Samsung did that kind of thing with the Galaxy Note, and I find the folding phones to be an extension of that.
I love technology, I work in technology and I appreciate it, but I have no desire for this. Give me a 5" screen, with powerful hardware under the hood and a good, latest-gen LTE/5G/whatever radio and WiFi 6e/7/whatever, and a decent battery, and I’m happy. Lately phones are too big for my large hands, and have cut so many corners that anything affordable is slow as all heck. I don’t want to pay multiple thousands of dollars for something that works for me, simply because it has a bunch of fancy camera features I’m never going to care about. Having a camera is good, but 90% of the time I’m taking pictures of racks of equipment, wires, and my cat. I don’t need a 50 megapixel camera with both wide angle and telephoto supplemental cameras and AI enhancements/image processing to capture images of my feline, or my network switch. What I do need is something that I can flip between half a dozen different apps to do my job, with a fast network connection so I can move data around quickly, and a battery that doesn’t need charging multiple times a day so that my phone will stay powered on while I work…
My VELVET doubles as a drawing tablet when I’m away from the big pen display I have at home. And it can(itself) use portable monitors. I won’t buy just any popular-fad-phone, I want a replacement-goldfish
Aside from price, the fact that they are twice as thicker as a regular phone make them pointless for me. When we have the technology to make them 8-12mm thickness I might be interested.
Until they make the protective screen durable up to lvl 5 scratches without dmg, ip 68 protection, flat front side without slightly risen bezels so I can comfortably use gestures, even the battery size and camera capabilities with normal flagships and the price of course, it’s a nono for me. 🤔 Otherwise overpriced gimmick…
Generally, I love mine, I like reading the paper on mine. No issues with durability, I take mine downhill mountain biking in the PNW, skiing in Canada, the works. The only issue I have with mine is that the made for foldable apps suck ass and you must avoid them like the plague. Who wants a permanent hamburger menu that takes up half the screen permanently while the other half of the screen (which is smaller than a normal phone) is used to display content, messages, and pictures?
Imagine the ribbon at the top of microsoft word taking up 50% of your monitor, lmao.
The high price also has to go. I’d like to see foldables for $750, though I know that’s a pipe dream.
Smart analogy too; I just can't see these replacing regular smart phones until the technology makes them sufficiently thin. Because of this I doubt we will see them lower much in price. I would also want an s pen built into the phone.
I simply don’t need it.
In fact, if there was a 4" phone that is supported by LineageOS, I’d buy it in a heartbeat.
I carry my phone in my front pants pocket, and thickness is a lot more noticeable there than the size of the screen.
Nah. A sunglasses form-factor, head-mounted display. Only 1080p per eye but does the trick. It’s been a game changer for how I prefer to interact with devices. My current phone doesn’t support DisplayPort AltMode, unfortunately, but that is going to be a priority for me on the next one.
The purpose of folding a phone is carrying it in a more pocketable form.
I don’t need that because I’m a man always with regular pockets which are fine for carrying a Pixel 6 Pro screen.
If I wanted a bigger screen, I would also want a keyboard and a mouse. So you could say that I’m freaking hyped for the upcoming DEX-like desktop mode coming to AOSP. Video-out on a Pixel, fucking finally.
Add comment