Replies

gpollara, 9 months ago to academicchatter

First experience of submitting to Review Commons (as middle author, so I didn't initiate).

Intrigued by the model. If I understand it right, you submit a #preprint there, it gets peer reviewed (reviewers chosen by Review Commons editors) and then you submit modified paper with reviews to a journal.

Wonder how journals perceive this model. Maybe it's no different to submitting to a new journal with reviews from previous submission, which I like.

Thoughts @academicchatter #academicchatter?

steveroyle, 9 months ago

@gpollara @academicchatter We did a Review Commons submission a while back. It was a good experience for us, I wrote a bit about it (scroll to end)
https://quantixed.org/2021/02/23/keep-a-knockin-new-paper-using-knock-in-technology/
We have also had a lot of experience with just porting a paper-with-reviews to another journal. The difference is that reviewer identity is known in the case of RC but not necessarily with a port.