First experience of submitting to Review Commons (as middle author, so I didn't initiate).
Intrigued by the model. If I understand it right, you submit a #preprint there, it gets peer reviewed (reviewers chosen by Review Commons editors) and then you submit modified paper with reviews to a journal.
Wonder how journals perceive this model. Maybe it's no different to submitting to a new journal with reviews from previous submission, which I like.
@gpollara@academicchatter looks interesting and as someone who works in the humanities and social sciences I can see how this could really work there too. The affiliated journal aspect is slightly odd. Why not submit directly to those journals? And it’s hard to see how you you could volunteer to be a reviewer. I wonder also if this has been ‘monetised’…?
@alexprichard@academicchatter Yeah I had some questions. I haven't yet worked out if / how money flows in this system. And whether all journals are happy to accept reviews from here, or would. In effect start the process again. 🤷♂️
Add comment