@jacobward@hcommons.social
@jacobward@hcommons.social avatar

jacobward

@[email protected]

Historian of science, technology, and neoliberalism. Mainly British history but Eurocurious. Assistant Professor at Maastricht University.

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

jacobward, to histodons
@jacobward@hcommons.social avatar

I made a bibliography of the post-war of , , and in the . Hopefully it's useful to other and not just myself.

Read it here: https://jacobward.substack.com/p/reading-the-history-of-futurology

@histodons

jacobward, to histodons
@jacobward@hcommons.social avatar

Isidor Isaac Rabi's review of two books, by non-scientists (the horror!), on the role of scientists in policy-making is grumpy and hilarious: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2147002

@histodons

jacobward, to histodons
@jacobward@hcommons.social avatar

I made a thing. Read my newsletter about my project on the of , , and here: https://jacobward.substack.com/ @histodons

Private
jacobward,
@jacobward@hcommons.social avatar

@dancarkner @histodons thanks, Abby FineReader came up on my radar after posting but yes, looks like a corporate solution for an individual problem (or that's probably how my university library would see it...)

jacobward,
@jacobward@hcommons.social avatar

@polarbear @histodons it might only be marginal, but the scanner app introduces a couple extra points of friction in the archive. First is the time for image processing and second is the time for file management (e.g. creating a new file for each document you scan). The folders I'm looking at might have dozens of individual documents inside. If I can do these parts later, then I have more time for photographing documents while in the archive.

But yeah, this might be splitting hairs over very marginal gains! And there might also be very obvious solutions to the above friction points that I just haven't realised.

jacobward,
@jacobward@hcommons.social avatar

@benjamingeer @histodons good to know, thanks! I'm especially interested in software that can do the automatic image processing that smartphone scanner apps do (centering, sharpening, brightening, etc.) but Acrobat is a candidate if I can't find something to do that.

jacobward,
@jacobward@hcommons.social avatar

@zed @histodons alas I'm on windows but have boosted in case it helps any fellow archival photographers who are Mac users, and thanks so much for whipping this up - very kind of you

jacobward,
@jacobward@hcommons.social avatar

@dta_cthomas @polarbear @histodons this looks really interesting, thank you, and I can imagine some colleagues in my faculty who'd also be very interested in Transkribus. Unfortunately I think the UK National Archives would probably block the Tent but I love it!!

jacobward,
@jacobward@hcommons.social avatar

@tillgrallert @dancarkner @histodons good to know, thanks. Unfortunately on Windows but had a few Mac-specific recommendations that are making me want to flip-flop back to Mac after switching away about 10 years ago!

Private
jacobward,
@jacobward@hcommons.social avatar

@brian_gettler @histodons I recently read and very much enjoyed Sewell's Logics of History. I think the introduction does a good job of explaining how historians deal with social time, but that means it does focus less on the specifics of source analysis, collection, etc. and more on questions like "what is an historical event?"

For more practical purposes, I really the last three chapters on historical methods (especially the last chapter, ‘Analyzing and Interpreting Historical Sources: A Basic
Methodology') in Bucheli and Wadhwani's edited collection Organizations in Time. While ostensibly focussed on organizational history, I think the chapter's actually incredibly versatile and transferable, and articulates very succinctly the historical process of triangulating and reading sources and context against each other.

jacobward, to RSS
@jacobward@hcommons.social avatar

Has anyone else (re)turned to since the of social media began? The level of control over my feeds and the absence of algorithms (mostly speaking...) has been a breath of fresh air.

Especially interested in how fellow , , and other are using RSS. What feeds are you subscribed to and what readers are you using? @histodons @academicchatter

I'm using Feedly purely because I had a very old account gathering dust but I'm not super keen on its slant towards business users and its AI push. As for feeds, I've got two groups - one for general blogs and sites (e.g. @thesiswhisperer) and one for and journals.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • uselessserver093
  • Food
  • aaaaaaacccccccce
  • test
  • CafeMeta
  • testmag
  • MUD
  • RhythmGameZone
  • RSS
  • dabs
  • KamenRider
  • TheResearchGuardian
  • KbinCafe
  • Socialism
  • oklahoma
  • SuperSentai
  • feritale
  • All magazines