seanfobbe, to sociology
@seanfobbe@fediscience.org avatar

🔔 New Essay 🔔 Some Thoughts on Large Language Models in the Legal Domain

I published a new (and long-ish) essay on my personal blog: https://seanfobbe.com/posts/2023-07-27_some-thoughts-on-large-language-models-in-the-legal-domain/

The essay touches on:

📌 The ChatGPT Lawyer
📌 Citations in LLMs
📌 Background on LLMs
📌 Legal Ideating
📌 Legal Research
📌 Legal Drafting
📌 Summarization
📌 Programming for Lawyers

@law @legaltech @sociology @politicalscience

krisnelson,
@krisnelson@legal.social avatar

@seanfobbe @law @legaltech @sociology @politicalscience Nice summary of LLMs in ! My sense is very much in agreement with you.

I keep trying them bc they really feel like they ought to be useful, but I'm reminded of a lot of graphical HTML tools which end up requiring so many tweaks that it can be easier to hand code.

The only bit that might be missing from this is the issue of private or proprietary info possibly flowing back into the LLMs? That concerns me with the cloud-based ones.

seanfobbe,
@seanfobbe@fediscience.org avatar

@krisnelson @law @legaltech @sociology @politicalscience Thanks! Yeah, there's a whole other post on LLM risks waiting to be written.

Data leakage/exfiltration is one, then there's the significant environmental footprint, such as through water usage: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2304.03271.pdf

LLMs also pose a cyber security risk, since one can "poison" the model during fine-tuning, esp. if you use user input for training: https://softwarecrisis.dev/letters/the-poisoning-of-chatgpt/ Internet-enabled LLMs have additional vulnerabilities.

seanfobbe, to politicalscience
@seanfobbe@fediscience.org avatar

🔔 New Article 🔔

Modeling Data Workflows with {targets}

There's a new (longish) article on my personal blog that describes my experiences and principles when modeling data workflows with {targets} for R.

Link: https://seanfobbe.com/posts/2023-11-12_modeling-data-workflows-with-targets/

Reading length is ca. 15 min.

@rstats @legaltech @politicalscience

andrew, to law
@andrew@esq.social avatar

We (being @Jason, @jacobschumer and me) recorded episode 27 of Esquiring Minds last night and it was, as they say, a good one.

I think, I never listen back. Topics included the #lsat, #legaltech specifically #ai, and as always a dusting of #baseball and #football.

#lawfedi @law #legalai #legaltech

https://zencastr.com/z/6Mw26iZZ

seanfobbe, to politicalscience
@seanfobbe@fediscience.org avatar

🔔 Update 🔔 Curious about my tech tools and workflow? I've updated and greatly expanded the annotated list of favorite open source tools on my website: https://seanfobbe.com/code/

Includes both general tools (browser, e-mail, OS, editor) and data science specific tools (R, R packages, reproducible science).

German translation coming soon!


@rstats @histodons @politicalscience

andrew, to law
@andrew@esq.social avatar

Hey folks, we have a discussion going on https://links.esq.social/c/communityrequest about adding a "tech" community to the instance.

That's a lot of jargon.

Anywho, we're trying to decide if it should be narrowly tailored to just legal tech, or open to tech discussion among legal professionals. Thoughts?

@law

https://links.esq.social/c/communityrequest

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • uselessserver093
  • Food
  • aaaaaaacccccccce
  • test
  • CafeMeta
  • testmag
  • MUD
  • RhythmGameZone
  • RSS
  • dabs
  • KamenRider
  • Ask_kbincafe
  • TheResearchGuardian
  • KbinCafe
  • Socialism
  • oklahoma
  • SuperSentai
  • feritale
  • All magazines