bioemerl,

Except carbon sequestration is not ever going to work and it's always going to be more expensive than having just burned that fuel in the first place.

Maybe you'll get an advantage if it's nearly free to do and you use exclusively solar power in areas with excesses of it.

But on average? Sequestration is not an answer. The carbon dioxide in our atmosphere is just too rare to effectively pull out, and it's never going to be capable of even reaching fractions of what we're emitting right now.

We have one answer to this problem and one answer only.

Stop. Using. Fossil. Fuels.

Tax carbon.

Start getting ready to do geoengineering, because we are going to need it.

People like to bitch and say that we shouldn't be changing the environment, but guess what, we're changing the environment if we like it or not, it's only a question of it it's in our interests or if it's an uncontrolled self-destructive form.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • uselessserver093
  • Food
  • aaaaaaacccccccce
  • [email protected]
  • test
  • CafeMeta
  • testmag
  • MUD
  • RhythmGameZone
  • RSS
  • dabs
  • Socialism
  • KbinCafe
  • TheResearchGuardian
  • Ask_kbincafe
  • oklahoma
  • feritale
  • SuperSentai
  • KamenRider
  • All magazines