GPT detectors are biased against non-native English writers

GPT detectors frequently misclassify non-native English writing as AI generated, raising concerns about fairness and robustness. Addressing the biases in these detectors is crucial to prevent the marginalization of non-native English speakers in evaluative and educational settings and to create a more equitable digital landscape.

Voyajer,
@Voyajer@kbin.social avatar

We've known those AI paper detection services were junk from the get go with their huge false positive rate on even native English papers.

InfiniteHench,
@InfiniteHench@kbin.social avatar

Huh. A bunch of brand new services built by a new handful of techbros has a bias against people who don’t look and sound like them? That is quite the lofty accusation! /s

IncognitoErgoSum,

Is kbin a place where we just call everyone we don't like "techbros"?

addie,
@addie@feddit.uk avatar

Just include some properly-cited facts, some opinion, some insight, something original, and we’ll be certain that your writing wasn’t AI-generated shit.

Also, these detectors are pretty worthless if that’s what they’re triggering on. AI never makes a spelling mistake. I’ve never seen it make a grammar mistake, because all it does is spew out the most likely next word based on copyright infringement on an unimaginable scale. It doesn’t produce the kind of non-idomatic constructions that break the flow of the text for native speakers, because it never generates anything worth reading.

idoubledo,

That’s because all non English speakers are robots

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • [email protected]
  • uselessserver093
  • Food
  • aaaaaaacccccccce
  • test
  • CafeMeta
  • testmag
  • MUD
  • RhythmGameZone
  • RSS
  • dabs
  • SuperSentai
  • oklahoma
  • Socialism
  • KbinCafe
  • TheResearchGuardian
  • KamenRider
  • feritale
  • All magazines