Yes. I get that, because I have the historical context. But nothing in the article directly says that, so to someone without the context, it doesn’t say anything about it.
I’m not being obtuse, I just think that unless your intent is preaching to the choir, the article isn’t a good choice without supporting context. And I’d appreciate it if you didn’t insult me just because you don’t like what I have to say. I’m not even disagreeing with the central premise, just how you’re presenting your message, so maybe ease up on the ad hominem.
ETA: just realized you’re not OP. Sorry about that.