sluggard,
@sluggard@infosec.exchange avatar

@support This might be something on my side, but I'm seeing infosec.exchange block-listed from Google Safe Browsing and possibly some other security "deny lists/block lists".

jerry,
@jerry@infosec.exchange avatar

@sluggard @support checking

jerry,
@jerry@infosec.exchange avatar

@sluggard @support I checked the google console along with all the normal URL reputation sites and I am not seeing anything wrong and chrome is letting me access the site without issue.

sluggard,
@sluggard@infosec.exchange avatar

@jerry @support the transparency report is fine. https://transparencyreport.google.com/safe-browsing/search?url=https:%2F%2Finfosec.exchange%2Fexplore&hl=en

I’ll check another list. Thanks for looking

sluggard,
@sluggard@infosec.exchange avatar

@jerry @support
It might be an overly broad interpretation.
Infosec.exchange is in the Emerging Threats "ET Open" ruleset (now owned by Proofpoint)
https://rules.emergingthreats.net/OPEN_download_instructions.html

infosec.exchange/@ginkgo/109436074199108459; is in emerging-malware.rules

in emerging-phishing.rules, there is this:
infosec.exchange/@rmceoin/109604157428550003

both show up in sid-msg.map

sluggard,
@sluggard@infosec.exchange avatar

@jerry @support And looking at the two posts, I can see why they came up. They shouldn't, but whatever Proofpoint is using to find threats isn't smart enough to understand that someone is posting hash codes for malware and phishing identifiers.

jerry,
@jerry@infosec.exchange avatar

@sluggard @support that is rather funny

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • uselessserver093
  • Food
  • aaaaaaacccccccce
  • test
  • CafeMeta
  • testmag
  • MUD
  • RhythmGameZone
  • RSS
  • dabs
  • KamenRider
  • Testmaggi
  • KbinCafe
  • Ask_kbincafe
  • TheResearchGuardian
  • Socialism
  • oklahoma
  • SuperSentai
  • feritale
  • All magazines