You aren’t seeing the focus of “science” you are seeing the focus of the news.
There is scientific focus is on all superconductors. This particular one just happens to have made the news because it’s possible it superconducts at room temp which would be ideal. But the real reason this one excites the scientific community is because it uses a completely novel approach and regardless of if this particuar compound works or not, this new approach shows a ton of promise for making new superconductors.
That also doesn’t mean that there isn’t other superconductor research being done elsewhere as well. The global scientific community isn’t one monolithic institution; it is thousands of individual labs all over the world each of which has their focus. Even while this one compound is being studdied there are also a dozen others being studied at the same time. Those studies just dont make the news because marginal gains aren’t as flashy. If a news outlet posted an article about a new metalic superconductor with a critical temp above -196C the average person wouldn’t care even though scientifically speaking that would be a huge deal because that high of a temp means you can cool it with liquid nitrogen instead of liquid helium. News outlets are in the entertainment business now. If the average person won’t find a story interesting then they won’t write it.
Also as it is we already have superconductors that operate well above -269C such as BSCCO which superconducts at -163C which is well above the boiling point of nitrogen. The issue with current “high temp” superconductors like BSCCO is that they are ceramics rather than metalic which means they are poor materials to make wire out of. There is also research being done on making those ceramic superconductors work in applications such as MRI units.