jwu, 9 months ago Those don’t need to be consecutive. King Charles III’s father was not King Charles II. So he could just be the 4th in his family with that name. And the dad was the 3rd in family with the other name. But it’s also possibly a nickname thing.
Those don’t need to be consecutive. King Charles III’s father was not King Charles II. So he could just be the 4th in his family with that name. And the dad was the 3rd in family with the other name.
But it’s also possibly a nickname thing.