kogasa, 10 months ago (edited 10 months ago) No, he’s right. “For any odd prime” is a not-unheard-of expression. It is usually to rule out 2 as a trivial case which may need to be handled separately. en.wikipedia.org/…/Fermat's_theorem_on_sums_of_tw… www.jstor.org/stable/2047029 www.jstor.org/stable/2374361
No, he’s right. “For any odd prime” is a not-unheard-of expression. It is usually to rule out 2 as a trivial case which may need to be handled separately.
en.wikipedia.org/…/Fermat's_theorem_on_sums_of_tw…
www.jstor.org/stable/2047029
www.jstor.org/stable/2374361