While off-topic, I’m of the opinion that Arch only exists to support elitists which relates to the comment.
Arch isn’t always the most up to date
It isn’t very reliable
It doesn’t try to be any easier to use (won’t even work with GNOME software)
It’s not as straight forward to contribute to like, say, Void Linux which causes issues with burnt-out and busy maintainers
It installs the the bare minimum so stuff won’t always work
The only real benefit is you get a smaller install size (x86 only) and maybe some more customisablility.
But for some reason it gets treated like an ideal for every Linux user to reach. It’s supposedly like to going to the Olympics as an elite athlete. An Arch system needs more work to maintain, but there isn’t really much to gain