Stoicism and turning the other cheek hasn’t worked. So calling it out makes perfect sense.
Is there some reason to think it doesn’t make sense? Your non-sequitur’s purpose is not made clear.
Trudeau is a single example of a man facing a similar issue, so just come up with 5-10 more and you’ll be close to convincing me.
First you have to show that the naysayers see it as an effective tool in bringing down the typical male politician. Nobody is going to try to waste their time attacking someone using an attack that doesn’t work.
Blaming people for not brushing off comments like this is pretty gross.
I would have thought so, but here you are. Why do you want to introduce blame? Especially when it too is a non-sequitur.