It tends to both-sides issues like that. Here’s its initial response as an example:
AI-generated art is a fascinating and rapidly evolving field. It has the potential to democratize artistic expression, enabling those without traditional artistic skills to create visually compelling works. This technology can also serve as a tool for professional artists, offering new possibilities in digital art and design.
However, it also raises important ethical and creative questions. Issues like originality, copyright, and the impact on traditional artists' livelihoods are significant concerns. The line between inspiration and appropriation can become blurred when AI systems are trained on existing artworks.
In essence, AI art represents both a remarkable technological achievement and a complex cultural phenomenon, with its benefits and challenges continually evolving as the technology advances.
I think since it “views” the technology as being best applied as assistance neither of your followups super apply. If you disagree OR agree I’m happy to ask it whatever followup you’d like me to.