brekke, Norwegian
@brekke@eupolicy.social avatar

@academicchatter I recently published something on my personal website for the first time, and accidentally bumped into some interesting data on the reach of .

I shared the content on first (November 1), and on the day after. On November 20 I edited the post here, leading to two new boosts.

My toot received 6 boosts and 7 stars; my tweet got 6 retweets and 38 hearts. Yet, in terms of website traffic the two dates of Mastodon activity outperform Twitter.

ahimsa_pdx,
@ahimsa_pdx@disabled.social avatar

@brekke @academicchatter

"in terms of website traffic the two dates of Mastodon activity outperform Twitter"

If I'm reading this correctly, I think this means that Mastodon users are more likely to visit a website and read the article (at least some of it) than X/Twitter users?

#X

brekke,
@brekke@eupolicy.social avatar

@ahimsa_pdx @academicchatter This is how I interpret it, yes! I did share the draft with some colleagues the day before (giving a tiny bump of traffic), but the visits on November 1 should be mostly due to Mastodon. There also seems to be an effect bleeding into the day after a post was published, meaning that the Twitter number is probably slightly inflated.

It makes sense in a way, considering that Twitter has been taking steps to avoid people clicking links and leaving their site.

ahimsa_pdx,
@ahimsa_pdx@disabled.social avatar

@brekke @academicchatter
I had forgotten about that last point, twitter discouraging clicking links (delays, not showing headlines, etc).

I was only thinking about how maybe the different social media platforms end up selecting different types of users.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • uselessserver093
  • Food
  • aaaaaaacccccccce
  • [email protected]
  • test
  • CafeMeta
  • testmag
  • MUD
  • RhythmGameZone
  • RSS
  • dabs
  • Socialism
  • KbinCafe
  • TheResearchGuardian
  • oklahoma
  • feritale
  • SuperSentai
  • KamenRider
  • All magazines