@matthieu_xyz@calckey.social avatar

matthieu_xyz

@[email protected]

Threat hunting. FR/EN

Don’t send me DMs if I don’t follow you.

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

atomicpoet, to fediversenews

Have you seen the latest update from the Help Center? It offers insight into how views the . Let's take a closer look at the highlighted text together:

" is planning to use a protocol called to connect with other servers that support this protocol. Our aim is to enable communication between Threads and users on different fediverse platforms that we don't own or control."

Now, considering everything we know about Meta and their business practices, you might wonder why they're doing this. Well, here are a few reasons that could shed some light:

  1. Regulatory pressure: While Meta is doing its best to compete with , they also want to avoid appearing like a monopolistic force. By joining the Fediverse, they can show regulators that they are simply becoming part of an existing social network.

  2. Zuckerberg's strategy: Mark Zuckerberg has been observing what's been happening with Twitter ever since Elon Musk acquired it, and he's learned some lessons. Twitter has faced criticism for various missteps like alienating journalists, restricting API access, and even requiring logins to view tweets. Zuckerberg wants to assure people that Threads is different from Twitter and avoid those same pitfalls.

  3. Embracing social media decentralization: It's widely acknowledged in the social media industry that the future lies in decentralization. The era of closed-off platforms is gradually coming to an end. Just as Compuserve couldn't survive the open Internet, walled garden social media platforms won't be able to thrive in the open Fediverse. Meta doesn't want to become the next Compuserve.

  4. Early entry into an emerging ecosystem: Meta is eager to establish itself in the emerging Fediverse ecosystem, much like they tried to do with the Metaverse. Being an early player allows them to take a leadership position before other major players like , , and jump on board.

However, it's worth noting that there might be a personal rivalry at play here. There have been rumors of a rivalry between Zuckerberg and Musk, and it seems they don't particularly like each other. So, one could speculate that Zuckerberg might want to undermine Musk by taking down Twitter, the platform Musk acquired for a hefty sum of $44 billion.

Hope that provides some context and clarity on why Meta is making these moves.

What do you think about Meta’s Fediverse explainer?

https://help.instagram.com/169559812696339

@fediversenews

matthieu_xyz,
@matthieu_xyz@calckey.social avatar

@zbrando @atomicpoet @fediversenews
Meta CANNOT push ads through ActivityPub. That's not how federation works. That's not how any if this works. You receive posts from people you follow, if someone is making sponsored posts you can unfollow them. And that's it.

matthieu_xyz,
@matthieu_xyz@calckey.social avatar

@zbrando @atomicpoet @fediversenews
Meta CANNOT push ads through ActivityPub. That's not how federation works. That's not how any if this works. You receive posts from people you follow, if someone is making sponsored posts you can unfollow them. And that's it.

atomicpoet, to fediversenews

Federation with (via ) is getting closer.

The sandbox environment has now been launched, which means you can set up your own AT protocol-enabled server.

It's possible that Bluesky will finally start federating by the end of summer. However, knowing how most dev teams work, this launch is not a certainty. It always takes time to iron out bugs.

How successful do you think Bluesky's federation will be? And how will it impact the current userbase using Bluesky?

https://beyondtheblue.substack.com/p/beyond-the-blue-6

@fediversenews

matthieu_xyz,
@matthieu_xyz@calckey.social avatar

@atomicpoet @fediversenews
I expect a small amount of servers. A very small amount of BGS in particular. I wish good luck to anyone who tries to run a BGS because it seems like this particular service is going to be very costly to run.

I also expect a lot of confusion with all the different services and questions about who runs what.

For those who don’t know how AT protocol works, there isn’t a AT server, that’s not a thing. You have a PDS (that holds your account and knows your email/password), a BGS which index ALL posts from the ENTIRE NETWORK, an AppView that specifies what to do with the data (the microblog appview is called bluesky), Search is a different service, moderation and filters is a different service, there are as many servers as there are custom feeds and then there is the "placeholder" DID service (DID for Decentralized ID) which is just one server you cannot run your own.

So I expect a lot of "Hey admin, search seems to be broken − Ha, sorry, I don’t run the search service".

I also can’t see how the BGS are going to be community-run. If bluesky continues to grow, only big companies are going to run BGS servers. Sure it’s going to scale, but not in a very decentralized way.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • uselessserver093
  • Food
  • aaaaaaacccccccce
  • test
  • CafeMeta
  • testmag
  • MUD
  • RhythmGameZone
  • RSS
  • dabs
  • KamenRider
  • Ask_kbincafe
  • TheResearchGuardian
  • KbinCafe
  • Socialism
  • oklahoma
  • SuperSentai
  • feritale
  • All magazines