@Raisinbrand@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

Raisinbrand

@[email protected]

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

Raisinbrand,
@Raisinbrand@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

Yes it would. If wireguard is hosted in a vps, they can setup a client on their home network and mobile device, bypassing their home and isp nat.

Raisinbrand,
@Raisinbrand@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

I think you have a misunderstanding about wireguard clients.

As long as the server isn’t behind a cgnat, a connection from the client to the server can be made. It does not matter if the client is behind a cgnat or not. If that were true, privacy vpns like proton and mullvad would not work.

That said, tailscale is easy to setup compared to a wireguard tunnel, but wireguard has potentially more performance because tailscale uses wireguard-go rather than wireguard kernel.

Raisinbrand,
@Raisinbrand@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

I believe performance is situationally dependent, so it may or may not be faster, but it theoretically is. I personally choose wireguard over tailscale because it’s one less 3rd party involved, not for potential performance increases.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • wartaberita
  • uselessserver093
  • Food
  • aaaaaaacccccccce
  • test
  • CafeMeta
  • testmag
  • MUD
  • RhythmGameZone
  • RSS
  • dabs
  • KamenRider
  • Testmaggi
  • KbinCafe
  • Ask_kbincafe
  • TheResearchGuardian
  • Socialism
  • oklahoma
  • SuperSentai
  • feritale
  • All magazines