If someone is unable to pay the restitution because they’re incarcerated, they’re expected to make payments no “later than the first anniversary of the date,” of their release, the law says.
From the article. So seems like they thought of that too
This is exactly what I was thinking reading this. The statement seems to be written only from the authors perspective on what they think is proper or not. If the person being purposed to wants a big show of it then the proposer is being a good partner.
I can see where it could be a problem, but to blanket statement that it is a problem if anyone does it reachs to far. Each couple is unique and it’s part of their story.
Texas drunk drivers will now have to pay child support if they kill a parent, guardian (www.cnn.com)
A new law in Texas requires convicted drunk drivers to pay child support if they kill a child’s parent or guardian, according to House Bill 393....
Public marriage proposals aren’t romantic – they’re a form of coercion (archive.li)
Don’t make me an unwilling participant in your embarrassing show of affection, writes Guy Walters...