imperfectcognitions, to philosophy
@imperfectcognitions@mas.to avatar

On the blog today, Dan Degerman writes up a report of a workshop he organised on 'Silence and Psychopathology'. This event also doubled up as a launch event for project EPIC (Epistemic Injustice in Healthcare). @philosophy
https://imperfectcognitions.blogspot.com/2023/12/silence.html

Lupposofi,
@Lupposofi@mementomori.social avatar

@imperfectcognitions @philosophy Thanks a lot. 🤗 Nevertheless, I kind of like silence. The universe and outer space is full of that, why not people, at least sometimes? Silence is not the same as death. Most of all I fear the medicalization of silence(s), which philosophers, of course, do no allow to happen. 😉

PhilosophicalPsychology, to philosophy
@PhilosophicalPsychology@fediscience.org avatar

Latest papers: An based approach to can illuminate some of the causes, experiential character and consequences of affective disorders. So argues Joel Krueger in this piece: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09515089.2023.2243975?src= @philosophy @phenomenology

lupposofi,
@lupposofi@mastodontti.fi avatar

@PhilosophicalPsychology @philosophy @phenomenology Spent an hour with that article, too. The promise is that "Affordance frameworks can help us add phenomenological nuance to [various unusual] reports", and maybe assist thinking, e.g., the built environment in a fresh and affectively more helpful way.

The question might be, do they really? The article contains mainly promises. A more general question remains about the specific surplus-value of the arduous affordance-theoretical framework.

lisabortolotti, to philosophyofpsychiatry
@lisabortolotti@fediscience.org avatar
  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • uselessserver093
  • Food
  • aaaaaaacccccccce
  • test
  • CafeMeta
  • testmag
  • MUD
  • RhythmGameZone
  • RSS
  • dabs
  • KamenRider
  • Ask_kbincafe
  • TheResearchGuardian
  • KbinCafe
  • Socialism
  • oklahoma
  • SuperSentai
  • feritale
  • All magazines