gpollara, 9 months ago to academicchatter

Wow, this seems a very draconian and impractical stance for #NIH to take for its grants involving foreign partners! 👇

Article below haa a full takedown. #academicchatter #funding @academicchatter

"Beginning October 1, 2023, foreign subaward recipients will be required to provide the U.S. prime grantee “copies of all lab notebooks, all data and all documentation that support the research outcomes…no less than every six months, or more frequently based on risks”"

https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2307543?query=WB&cid=NEJM%20Weekend%20Briefing,%20September%209,%202023%20DM2282798_NEJM_Non_Subscriber&bid=1788903581

atthenius, 11 months ago to random

#Science funding agencies say NO to using #AI for #PeerReview

US’ #NIH Australia’s #ARC : 'NO’ to ChatGPT for peer-review

US' #NSF and Europe's #ERC mulling it over with working groups.

Concerns:
*Privacy/Piracy “the information becomes part of its training data. ” (why I don’t chatGPT though I really hate writing)
*Error ”AI-written reviews will be error-prone"
*Bias ”against non-mainstream views”
*Boring "lack … creativity “

Humans set the bar high
https://www.science.org/content/article/science-funding-agencies-say-no-using-ai-peer-review