klangcola, 11 months ago Depends on what exactly was covered in the patent. The article only says invented technology in 2010 to “move” videos from a small device like a smartphone to a larger device like a television. Which is vague and an obvious bogus patent. Prior art exists in both the digital and analogue space
Depends on what exactly was covered in the patent. The article only says
invented technology in 2010 to “move” videos from a small device like a smartphone to a larger device like a television.
Which is vague and an obvious bogus patent. Prior art exists in both the digital and analogue space