forcide,
@forcide@lemmit.xyz avatar

Nice, putting existing features behind paywalls…

ndsvw,
@ndsvw@feddit.de avatar

Lol, you give them a free market and they decide to create a system that looks like it was designed by the CP China…

ollie,

China is everything I don’t like

matricaria,

At this point, who even cares? Are there still people on Twitter? Just move on and use something else.

knobbysideup,

Or don’t. The whole concept of Twitter is just noise generation.

someguy3,

What’s the limit? As long as it’s high I can see this as decent anti spam idea.

loobkoob,
@loobkoob@kbin.social avatar

It'd make for a good anti-spam measure if there was a limit to the number of DMs users could send to other people who don't follow them back. It'd mean people can still use Twitter DMs like a normal messaging service (which isn't something I care for, but I know some people use it like that).

As it is, it just feels similar to the whole "rate limiting the number of tweets people can view per day" thing, where they're taking the most obvious route to reducing bandwidth usage by restricting users.

Thorny_Thicket,

I haven’t yet once reached that limit though. Probably doesn’t affect the vast majority of normal users and I’d imagine same applies to this DM limit aswell.

conciselyverbose,

Probably whatever number Elon arbitrarily decides he thinks maximizes the conversion rate to premium.

Chozo,

In that case, it'll definitely be 69 for new accounts and 420 for established accounts. He's predictable.

Thorny_Thicket,

Agreed. Most private messages I get are from fake accounts that probably spam the same message to hundreds of other users aswell.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • uselessserver093
  • [email protected]
  • Food
  • aaaaaaacccccccce
  • test
  • CafeMeta
  • testmag
  • MUD
  • RhythmGameZone
  • RSS
  • dabs
  • oklahoma
  • feritale
  • KamenRider
  • Ask_kbincafe
  • TheResearchGuardian
  • KbinCafe
  • Socialism
  • SuperSentai
  • All magazines